World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
10110
World Ranking
4745
National Ranking
195

Martine Cador publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martine Cador sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 126 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martine Cador D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martine Cador sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martine Cador is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their research spans several interconnected fields, focusing primarily on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions also in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their work covers a range of topics including neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study, receptor mechanisms and signaling, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, as well as traumatic brain injury research and neurovascular disturbances.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Martine Cador include Stéphanie Caillé, Florence Darlot, Salma Tannous, André Obenaus, and Beatriz Rodriguez-Grande.

Martine Cador has published in several notable venues, with repeated contributions to Psychopharmacology and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Other publication venues include Cell Metabolism, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, and Cerveau & Psycho.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Martine Cador include:

  • Circulating Triglycerides Gate Dopamine-Associated Behaviors through DRD2-Expressing Neurons, 2020, Cell Metabolism
  • Flavor additives facilitate oral self-administration of nicotine solution in mice, 2021, Psychopharmacology
  • A single mild juvenile TBI in male mice leads to regional brain tissue abnormalities at 12 months of age that correlate with cognitive impairment at the middle age, 2023, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Poor inhibitory control predicts sex-specific vulnerability to nicotine rewarding properties in mice, 2023, Psychopharmacology
  • Poor attentional control as a sex-specific biomarker to assess vulnerability to nicotine addiction in mice, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their research fields emphasize cellular and molecular neuroscience and molecular biology, along with nutrition and dietetics, epidemiology, and neurology as important subfields. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected by a focus on biochemical and neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying behavior and brain injury.

Best Publications

  • Involvement of the amygdala in stimulus-reward associations: interaction with the ventral striatum.

    M. Cador;T.W. Robbins;B.J. Everitt

  • Interactions between the amygdala and ventral striatum in stimulus-reward associations: studies using a second-order schedule of sexual reinforcement.

    B.J. Everitt;M. Cador;T.W. Robbins

  • Limbic-striatal interactions in reward-related processes.

    T.W. Robbins;M. Cador;J.R. Taylor;B.J. Everitt

  • Evidence of a complete independence of the neurobiological substrates for the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine.

    M. Cador;Y. Bjijou;L. Stinus

  • Opioids for hedonic experience and dopamine to get ready for it.

    M. Flavia Barbano;Martine Cador

  • Prenatal stress in rats facilitates amphetamine-induced sensitization and induces long-lasting changes in dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens.

    Chantal Henry;Gilles Guegant;Martine Cador;Elisabeth Arnauld

  • The subthalamic nucleus exerts opposite control on cocaine and 'natural' rewards

    Christelle Baunez;Carine Dias;Martine Cador;Marianne Amalric

  • Reducing the desire for cocaine with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

    Tiphaine Rouaud;Sylvie Lardeux;Nicolas Panayotis;Dany Paleressompoulle

  • Relative roles of ventral striatal D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in responding with conditioned reinforcement

    G. Wolterink;G. Phillips;M. Cador;I. Donselaar-Wolterink

  • Potentiation of the effects of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic-dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens.

    M. Cador;J. R. Taylor;T. W. Robbins

  • D-amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization: implication of a glutamatergic medial prefrontal cortex-ventral tegmental area innervation.

    M Cador;Y Bjijou;S Cailhol;L Stinus

  • Dissociation of psychomotor sensitization from compulsive cocaine consumption.

    Serge H Ahmed;Martine Cador

  • Neural correlates of the motivational and somatic components of naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal.

    François Frenois;Martine Cador;Stéphanie Caillé;Luis Stinus

  • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibition Dramatically Increases the Motivation to Self-Administer Nicotine in Rats

    Karine Guillem;Caroline Vouillac;Marc R. Azar;Loren H. Parsons

  • Modulation of the locomotor response to amphetamine by corticosterone.

    M. Cador;J. Dulluc;P. Morméde

  • The addition of five minor tobacco alkaloids increases nicotine-induced hyperactivity, sensitization and intravenous self-administration in rats.

    Kelly J. Clemens;Stephanie Caillé;Luis Stinus;Martine Cador

  • Pharmacological Analysis Demonstrates Dramatic Alteration of D1 Dopamine Receptor Neuronal Distribution in the Rat Analog of l-DOPA-Induced Dyskinesia

    Amandine Berthet;Grégory Porras;Evelyne Doudnikoff;Holger Stark

  • Acute and chronic amphetamine treatments differently regulate neuropeptide messenger RNA levels and Fos immunoreactivity in rat striatal neurons.

    M. Jaber;M. Cador;B. Dumartin;E. Normand

  • Buprenorphine and a CRF1 antagonist block the acquisition of opiate withdrawal-induced conditioned place aversion in rats.

    Luis Stinus;Martine Cador;Eric P Zorrilla;George F Koob

  • Central administration of a CRF antagonist blocks the development of stress-induced behavioral sensitization.

    Belinda J. Cole;Martine Cador;Luis Stinus;Jean Rivier

  • Differential regulation of the consummatory, motivational and anticipatory aspects of feeding behavior by dopaminergic and opioidergic drugs.

    Maria Flavia Barbano;Martine Cador

Frequent Co-Authors

Serge H. Ahmed
Serge H. Ahmed University of Bordeaux
George F. Koob
George F. Koob National Institute on Drug Abuse
Christelle Baunez
Christelle Baunez Aix-Marseille University
M. Le Moal
M. Le Moal University of Bordeaux
Leandro F. Vendruscolo
Leandro F. Vendruscolo National Institutes of Health
Etienne Coutureau
Etienne Coutureau Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Sophie Layé
Sophie Layé University of Bordeaux
Olivier J. Manzoni
Olivier J. Manzoni Aix-Marseille University
François Georges
François Georges University of Bordeaux
Pierre Mormède
Pierre Mormède Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career options in related fields. If you’re interested in mental health support, pursuing affordable msw programs online can prepare you for a career as a licensed social worker, offering flexibility and lower costs. For those drawn to behavior analysis, consider bcba master's programs online, which equip graduates for certification in applied behavior analysis—a crucial area for treating developmental and behavioral disorders.

Time and cost-efficiency are major concerns for prospective students. If you want to complete your degree quickly, msw programs and accelerated psychology degree online offerings help you earn credentials faster, often through intensive coursework and flexible online formats. Each pathway provides specialized skills applicable to neuroscience, psychology, and behavioral sciences, enhancing your career prospects while supporting your passion for helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Martine Cador

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles