World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
8040
World Ranking
7366
National Ranking
337

Guy Simonnet publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Simonnet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 137 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Guy Simonnet D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Simonnet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy Simonnet is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France and works primarily in the fields of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research encompasses both broad and specialized areas, with significant contributions in Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, and Rheumatology.

Their work covers a variety of main topics including receptor mechanisms and signaling, neuropeptides and animal physiology, chemical synthesis and analysis, chemical synthesis and reactions, catalytic cross-coupling reactions, catalytic C-H functionalization methods, and folate and B vitamins research.

Simonnet has published research in several peer-reviewed journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • ChemMedChem
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • RSC Medicinal Chemistry
  • Organic Process Research & Development
  • ACS Catalysis

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably Martine Schmitt and Séverine Schneider, each with eight joint publications, followed by Gaëlle Friocourt and Cécile Voisset with five appearances each, and Maha Sinane with four.

Selected recent papers by Guy Simonnet are:

  • Comprehensive overview of biased pharmacology at the opioid receptors: biased ligands and bias factors, 2021, RSC Medicinal Chemistry
  • Minimizing HCN in DIC/Oxyma-Mediated Amide Bond-Forming Reactions, 2020, Organic Process Research & Development
  • Anti-prion Drugs Targeting the Protein Folding Activity of the Ribosome Reduce PABPN1 Aggregation, 2021, Neurotherapeutics
  • In Situ Formation of Cationic π-Allylpalladium Precatalysts in Alcoholic Solvents: Application to C-N Bond Formation, 2021, ACS Catalysis
  • Identification of an N-acylated-DArg-Leu-NH2 Dipeptide as a Highly Selective Neuropeptide FF1 Receptor Antagonist That Potently Prevents Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia, 2021, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Best Publications

  • Long-lasting Hyperalgesia Induced by Fentanyl in Rats: Preventive Effect of Ketamine

    Evelyne Célèrier;Cyril Rivat;Yan Jun;Jean Paul Laulin

  • The role of ketamine in preventing fentanyl-induced hyperalgesia and subsequent acute morphine tolerance.

    Jean-Paul Laulin;Pierre Maurette;Jean-Benoît Corcuff;Cyril Rivat

  • Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced by repeated heroin administration: a sensitization process.

    Evelyne Célèrier;Jean-Paul Laulin;Jean-Benoı̂t Corcuff;Michel Le Moal

  • Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: abnormal or normal pain?

    Guy Simonnet;Cyril Rivat

  • RF9, a potent and selective neuropeptide FF receptor antagonist, prevents opioid-induced tolerance associated with hyperalgesia

    Frédéric Simonin;Martine Schmitt;Jean-Paul Laulin;Emilie Laboureyras

  • Evidence for opiate-activated NMDA processes masking opiate analgesia in rats.

    Evelyne Célèrier;Jean-Paul Laulin;Agnès Larcher;Michel Le Moal

  • Acute tolerance associated with a single opiate administration: involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate-dependent pain facilitatory systems

    A Larcher;J.P Laulin;E Celerier;M Le Moal

  • Fentanyl enhancement of carrageenan-induced long-lasting hyperalgesia in rats: prevention by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine.

    Cyril Rivat;Jean Paul Laulin;Jean Benot Corcuff;Evelyne Célèrier

  • Supplementing desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia with small-dose ketamine reduces perioperative opioid analgesic requirements.

    Bruno Guignard;Carole Coste;Hélène Costes;Daniel I. Sessler

  • Opiate tolerance to daily heroin administration: an apparent phenomenon associated with enhanced pain sensitivity.

    J.P Laulin;E Célèrier;A Larcher;M Le Moal

  • Characterization of rat spinal cord receptors to FLFQPQRFamide, a mammalian morphine modulating peptide: a binding study.

    M. Allard;S. Geoffre;P. Legendre;J.D. Vincent

  • Long‐lasting increased pain sensitivity in rat following exposure to heroin for the first time

    Jean‐Paul Laulin;Agnès Larcher;Evelyne Célèrier;Michel Le Moal

  • Ketamine improves the management of exaggerated postoperative pain observed in perioperative fentanyl-treated rats.

    Philippe Richebé;Cyril Rivat;Jean Paul Laulin;Pierre Maurette

  • Non-nociceptive Environmental Stress Induces Hyperalgesia, Not Analgesia, in Pain and Opioid-Experienced Rats

    Cyril Rivat;Emilie Laboureyras;Jean Paul Laulin;Chloé Le Roy

  • Nitrous oxide revisited: evidence for potent antihyperalgesic properties.

    Philippe Richebé;Cyril Rivat;Cyril Creton;Jean Paul Laulin

  • Autoradiographic distribution of receptors to FLFQPQRFamide, a morphine-modulating peptide, in rat central nervous system.

    M. Allard;J.-M. Zajac;G. Simonnet

  • Differential interactions of cholecystokinin and FLFQPQRF-NH2 with μ and δ opioid antinociception in the rat spinal cord

    D. S. K. Magnuson;A. F. Sullivan;G. Simonnet;B. P. Roques

  • Analogues of F8Famide resistant to degradation, with high affinity and in vivo effects.

    Sophie Gicquel;Honoré Mazarguil;Michelle Allard;Guy Simonnet

  • Characterization and localization of a putative morphine-modulating peptide, FLFQPQRFamide, in the rat spinal cord: biochemical and immunocytochemical studies.

    M. Allard;D.T. Theodosis;P. Rousselot;M.C. Lombard

  • Effect of nerve activity on the in vivo release of [3H]serotonin continuously formed from L-[3H]tryptophan in the caudate nucleus of the cat.

    F. He´nry;G. Simonnet;S. Bourgoin;P. Soubrie

Frequent Co-Authors

Michèle Allard
Michèle Allard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Didier Vincent
Jean-Didier Vincent Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Marie Zajac
Jean-Marie Zajac Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
M. Le Moal
M. Le Moal University of Bordeaux
Pascal Legendre
Pascal Legendre Université Paris Cité
Michel Hamon
Michel Hamon Université Paris Cité
François Cesselin
François Cesselin Grenoble Alpes University
Martine Cador
Martine Cador University of Bordeaux
Florence Noble
Florence Noble Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can open a wide range of career opportunities, both in research and in applied fields such as counseling, therapy, and psychology. For students interested in the practical application of brain science, pursuing further education in counseling or therapy is a smart move—especially with the growing demand for mental health professionals.

There are numerous cacrep accredited counseling programs online, which ensure that your education meets the highest standards and prepares you for licensure. If affordability is a key concern, you can explore the cheapest counseling degree online options to help minimize costs without sacrificing quality.

For those passionate about helping families or couples navigate challenging times, accredited online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) offer specialized training that can expand your career prospects. Additionally, pursuing a masters of psychology online is an excellent way to deepen your understanding of human behavior and broaden your skill set for clinical or research-oriented roles.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Simonnet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles