World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
8465
World Ranking
7124
National Ranking
320

Florence Noble publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Noble sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Florence Noble D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Noble sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Florence Noble is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and related biomedical sciences, with a focus on neuropeptides, receptor signaling, and physiological responses.

The primary fields of study for Florence Noble include Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these broader areas, their work concentrates on subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Key topics investigated by Noble encompass Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, and Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Neuroscience Applied, Frontiers in Pharmacology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Psychiatry, and Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Florence Noble are:

  • Traumatic Stress-Induced Vulnerability to Addiction: Critical Role of the Dynorphin/Kappa Opioid Receptor System, 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • TREK1 channel activation as a new analgesic strategy devoid of opioid adverse effects, 2020, British Journal of Pharmacology
  • Oxycodone, an opioid like the others?, 2023, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants and opioids: What is known in rodents and what still needs to be explored in humans?, 2023, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Activation of the Mu-Delta Opioid Receptor Heteromers Blocks Morphine Rewarding Effects, 2023, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Florence Noble has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Nicolas Marie
  • Raymond Mongeau
  • Virginie Beray-Berthat
  • Claire Leconte
  • Loïc Clémenceau

Best Publications

  • International Union of Pharmacology. XXI. Structure, distribution, and functions of cholecystokinin receptors.

    Florence Noble;Stephen A. Wank;Jacqueline N. Crawley;Jacques Bradwejn

  • Deletion of the background potassium channel TREK-1 results in a depression-resistant phenotype.

    Catherine Heurteaux;Guillaume Lucas;Nicolas Guy;Malika El Yacoubi

  • CCK-B receptor: chemistry, molecular biology, biochemistry and pharmacology

    Florence Noble;Bernard P. Roques

  • Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol releases and facilitates the effects of endogenous enkephalins: reduction in morphine withdrawal syndrome without change in rewarding effect

    Olga Valverde;Florence Noble;Françoise Beslot;Valérie Daugé

  • New treatments for cocaine dependence: a focused review.

    Laurent Karila;David Gorelick;Aviv Weinstein;Florence Noble

  • "Mixed inhibitor-prodrug" as a new approach toward systemically active inhibitors of enkephalin-degrading enzymes.

    Marie Claude Fournie-Zaluski;Pascal Coric;Serge Turcaud;Evelyne Lucas

  • Blockade of Acute Microglial Activation by Minocycline Promotes Neuroprotection and Reduces Locomotor Hyperactivity after Closed Head Injury in Mice: A Twelve-Week Follow-Up Study

    Shadi Homsi;Tomaso Piaggio;Nicole Croci;Florence Noble

  • Opioid receptor desensitization: mechanisms and its link to tolerance.

    Stéphane Allouche;Florence Noble;Nicolas Marie;Nicolas Marie;Nicolas Marie

  • Inhibition of the enkephalin-metabolizing enzymes by the first systemically active mixed inhibitor prodrug RB 101 induces potent analgesic responses in mice and rats.

    F Noble;J M Soleilhac;E Soroca-Lucas;S Turcaud

  • Importance of ERK activation in behavioral and biochemical effects induced by MDMA in mice.

    Julie Salzmann;Cynthia Marie-claire;Stéphanie Le Guen;Bernard P Roques

  • Reduction of opioid dependence by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A in mice: evaluation of the interest in pharmacotherapy of opioid addiction

    Magdalena Mas-Nieto;Blandine Pommier;Eleni T Tzavara;Anne Caneparo

  • Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Metabolism: Role of Aminopeptidase and Endopeptidase 24.15

    Jose-Luis Montiel;Fabrice Cornille;Bernard P. Roques;Florence Noble

  • Cytoskeletal genes regulation by chronic morphine treatment in rat striatum

    Cynthia Marie-Claire;Cindie Courtin;Bernard P Roques;Florence Noble

  • Modulation of opioid antinociception by CCK at the supraspinal level : evidence of regulatory mechanisms between CCK and enkephalin systems in the control of pain

    Florence Noble;Muriel Derrien;Bernard P. Roques

  • Phosphinic derivatives as new dual enkephalin-degrading enzyme inhibitors: synthesis, biological properties, and antinociceptive activities.

    Huixiong Chen;Florence Noble;Aurélie Mothé;Hervé Meudal

  • Physiological control of emotion-related behaviors by endogenous enkephalins involves essentially the delta opioid receptors.

    M. Mas Nieto;S.L.E. Guen;B.L. Kieffer;B.P. Roques

  • Potent and systemically active aminopeptidase N inhibitors designed from active-site investigation.

    Marie Claude Fournie-Zaluski;Pascale Coric;Serge Turcaud;Luce Bruetschy

  • Differential desensitization of μ- and δ- opioid receptors in selected neural pathways following chronic morphine treatment

    Florence Noble;Brian M. Cox

  • Synthesis and Biological Properties of New Constrained CCK-B Antagonists: Discrimination of Two Affinity States of the CCK-B Receptor on Transfected CHO Cells

    Bruno Bellier;Isabelle McCort-Tranchepain;Bertrand Ducos;Sophie Danascimento

  • Association of aminopeptidase N and endopeptidase 24.15 inhibitors potentiate behavioral effects mediated by nociceptin/orphanin FQ in mice

    Florence Noble;Bernard P Roques

  • Deletion of CCK2 Receptor in Mice Results in an Upregulation of the Endogenous Opioid System

    Blandine Pommier;Françoise Beslot;Axelle Simon;Matthieu Pophillat

  • Polyamine deficient diet to relieve pain hypersensitivity.

    Cyril Rivat;Philippe Richebé;Emilie Laboureyras;Jean Paul Laulin

  • Differential Regulation of D1 Dopamine Receptor‐ and of A2a Adenosine Receptor‐Stimulated Adenylyl Cyclase by μ‐, δ1‐, and δ2‐Opioid Agonists in Rat Caudate Putamen

    Florence Noble;Brian M. Cox

  • Chronic morphine treatment modulates the extracellular levels of endogenous enkephalins in rat brain structures involved in opiate dependence: a microdialysis study.

    Magdalena Mas Nieto;Jodie Wilson;Annie Cupo;Bernard P Roques

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard P. Roques
Bernard P. Roques Université Paris Cité
Marie-Claude Fournie-Zaluski
Marie-Claude Fournie-Zaluski Grenoble Alpes University
Rafael Maldonado
Rafael Maldonado Pompeu Fabra University
Bernard-Pierre Roques
Bernard-Pierre Roques Grenoble Alpes University
Brigitte L. Kieffer
Brigitte L. Kieffer University of Strasbourg
Michel Reynaud
Michel Reynaud University of Paris-Saclay
Bruno Mégarbane
Bruno Mégarbane Université Paris Cité
Kim B. Seroogy
Kim B. Seroogy University of Cincinnati
Aviv Weinstein
Aviv Weinstein Ariel University
Jacqueline N. Crawley
Jacqueline N. Crawley University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider complementary or alternative degree options. Many choose to enroll in accelerated programs online to complete their studies faster and launch their careers sooner. This is especially advantageous if you're eager to move from academics into the workforce without sacrificing the depth of your education.

Career opportunities for neuroscience graduates can be lucrative, particularly when you focus on 4 year degrees that pay well and target the highest paying majors. These pathways often lead to professions in healthcare, research, technology, and pharmaceuticals, all of which require analytical and problem-solving skills acquired during neuroscience studies.

Financial accessibility is also a key consideration. Many reputable institutions are included among accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, making it easier to secure funding and reduce student debt. This flexibility means you can focus on your studies and career preparation without excessive financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Florence Noble

Trending Scientists