World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
23088
World Ranking
14731
National Ranking
485

David Wilson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Wilson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 592 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Wilson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Wilson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Wilson is affiliated with the Burnet Institute in Australia and has contributed to fields intersecting medicine, economics, econometrics, and finance. Their research primarily addresses infectious diseases, with a focus on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and COVID-19 epidemiology.

Their work spans several main research topics, including:

  • HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Global Maternal and Child Health

David Wilson's research outputs include journal articles, preprints, and book contributions. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Modelling the impact of relaxing COVID-19 control measures during a period of low viral transmission," 2020, The Medical Journal of Australia
  • "Technology and Universal Health Coverage: Examining the role of digital health," 2021, Journal of Global Health
  • "Impacts of COVID-19-related service disruptions on TB incidence and deaths in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Mozambique, and Peru: Implications for national TB responses," 2022, PLOS Global Public Health
  • "Sexual and reproductive health mobile apps: results from a cross-sectional values and preferences survey to inform World Health Organization normative guidance on self-care interventions," 2020, Global Health Action
  • "Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

David Wilson frequently collaborates with several researchers contributing to their interdisciplinary work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Marelize Görgens
  • Sherrie L. Kelly
  • Romesh Abeysuriya
  • Pandu Harimurti
  • Khanya Mabuza

Their work is often published in venues that focus on public health, epidemiology, and infectious diseases. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • PLOS Global Public Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • African Journal of AIDS Research

In addition to articles, David Wilson has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Washington, DC: World Bank eBooks:

  • "Tackling the World's Fastest-Growing HIV Epidemic: More Efficient HIV Responses in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," 2020

Their research integrates modelling and simulation with epidemiological methods to examine disease transmission dynamics and the impacts of public health interventions. Their interdisciplinary expertise spans general health professions and economic evaluations related to health systems.

Best Publications

  • Prevention of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with low dose aspirin: Pulmonary Embolism Prevention (PEP) trial

    J O'Brien;H Duncan;G Kirsh;V Allen

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Relative risk of cardiovascular disease among people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    FM Islam;J Wu;J Jansson;DP Wilson

  • Relation between HIV viral load and infectiousness: a model-based analysis

    David P Wilson;Matthew G Law;Andrew E Grulich;David A Cooper

  • Per-contact probability of HIV transmission in homosexual men in Sydney in the era of HAART.

    Fengyi Jin;James Jansson;Matthew Law;Garrett P Prestage

  • HIV prevalence in China: integration of surveillance data and a systematic review.

    Lei Zhang;Lei Zhang;Eric Pui Fung Chow;Jun Jing;Xun Zhuang

  • "Know your epidemic, know your response": a useful approach, if we get it right.

    David Wilson;Daniel T Halperin

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statement

    Richard G. White;Avi J. Hakim;Matthew J. Salganik;Michael W. Spiller

  • Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

    Martin Dennis;Gillian Mead;John Forbes;Catriona Graham

  • Thromboxane A2-induced contraction of rat caudal arterial smooth muscle involves activation of Ca2+ entry and Ca2+ sensitization: Rho-associated kinase-mediated phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-855, but not Thr-697.

    David P. Wilson;Marija Susnjar;Enikő Kiss;Cindy Sutherland

  • Type III secretion à la Chlamydia

    Jan Peters;David P. Wilson;Garry Myers;Peter Timms

  • Sustaining access to antiretroviral therapy in the less-developed world: lessons from Brazil and Thailand.

    Nathan Ford;David Wilson;Gabriela Costa Chaves;Michel Lotrowska

  • The role of RhoA and Rho-associated kinase in vascular smooth muscle contraction.

    Karl Swärd;Mitsuo Mita;David P. Wilson;Jing Ti Deng

  • Health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of earlier eligibility for adult antiretroviral therapy and expanded treatment coverage: A combined analysis of 12 mathematical models

    Jeffrey W. Eaton;Nicolas A. Menzies;John Stover;Valentina Cambiano

  • Characterizing the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in the Middle East and North Africa: Time for Strategic Action

    Laith J. Abu-Raddad;Francisca Ayodeji Akala;Iris Semini;Gabriele Riedner

  • Importance of promoting HIV testing for preventing secondary transmissions: modelling the Australian HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men.

    David P. Wilson;Alexander Hoare;David G. Regan;Matthew G. Law

  • The cost-effectiveness of harm reduction

    David P. Wilson;Braedon Donald;Andrew J. Shattock;Denise Wilson

  • Synergistic interactions in cellulose hydrolysis

    Maxim Kostylev;David Wilson

  • Dry sex in Zimbabwe and implications for condom use

    Diane Civic;David Wilson

  • Relation between HIV viral load and infectiousness : a model-based analysis. Commentary

    Geoffrey P. Garnett;Brian Gazzard;David P. Wilson;Matthew G. Law

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Hellard
Margaret Hellard Burnet Institute
John M. Kaldor
John M. Kaldor University of New South Wales
Mark Stoove
Mark Stoove Burnet Institute
Eric P F Chow
Eric P F Chow Monash University
Garrett Prestage
Garrett Prestage University of New South Wales
Matthew Law
Matthew Law University of New South Wales
Nathan Ford
Nathan Ford World Health Organization
Peter Timms
Peter Timms University of the Sunshine Coast
Alexander J. Thompson
Alexander J. Thompson Ascension Health
Andrew E. Grulich
Andrew E. Grulich University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in related health careers or alternative pathways? Online degree programs in the healthcare field offer flexible, affordable options to jumpstart your career.

Health information management is an increasingly in-demand field, supporting medical teams by managing patient data and health records. A bachelor of health information management online degree can be a smart choice if you want to work at the intersection of healthcare and technology.

Medical billing and coding programs are also popular, allowing graduates to ensure accurate and organized patient records. If you’re wondering about program pricing, learn more about the average cost of medical billing and coding program options available online.

For those interested in clinical roles, obtaining a nursing degree is now more accessible than ever. There are many cheapest online fnp programs (Family Nurse Practitioner) to consider. Additionally, a variety of online nursing courses can help you upskill or start your journey in patient care.

Best Scientists Citing David Wilson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles