World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
12717
World Ranking
3412
National Ranking
172

John de Wit publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John de Wit sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 242 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

John de Wit D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John de Wit sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John de Wit is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and focuses their research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans several subfields including General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research covers topics such as HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk, Sex Work and Related Issues, Health Disparities and Outcomes, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, and HIV Research and Treatment.

John de Wit has contributed to multiple academic papers, with recent publications including:

  • Risk factors for loss to follow-up from antiretroviral therapy programmes in low-income and middle-income countries (2020, AIDS)
  • Social Inequality and Solidarity in Times of COVID-19 (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Slow Uptake of PrEP: Behavioral Predictors and the Influence of Price on PrEP Uptake Among MSM with a High Interest in PrEP (2021, AIDS and Behavior)
  • The Fading of the Mpox Outbreak Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Mathematical Modelling Study (2023, The Journal of Infectious Diseases)
  • Digital chemsex support and care: The potential of just-in-time adaptive interventions (2020, International Journal of Drug Policy)

Throughout their career, John de Wit has frequently published in venues such as:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Sexual Health
  • Frontiers in Reproductive Health

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Chantal den Daas
  • F. Marijn Stok
  • Martin Holt
  • Kai J. Jonas
  • Michèlle Bal

Best Publications

  • Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Charlotte D.W. Vinkers;Denise T.D. De Ridder;Joop J. Hox

  • What works best: objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception.

    John B. F. De Wit;Enny Das;Raymond Vet

  • The Impact of Vulnerability to and Severity of a Health Risk on Processing and Acceptance of Fear-Arousing Communications: A Meta-Analysis:

    Natascha de Hoog;Wolfgang Stroebe;John B. F. de Wit

  • Minority stress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults in Australia: Associations with psychological distress, suicidality, and substance use

    Toby Lea;John de Wit;Robert Reynolds

  • Environmental correlates of physical activity and dietary behaviours among young people: a systematic review of reviews.

    E. de Vet;D. T. D. de Ridder;J. B. F. de Wit;J. B. F. de Wit

  • Homosexual men change to risky sex when perceiving less threat of HIV/AIDS since availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a longitudinal study.

    Ineke G. Stolte;Nicole H. T. M. Dukers;Ronald B. Geskus;Roel A. Coutinho

  • Don't tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents

    F. Marijn Stok;Denise T. D. de Ridder;Emely de Vet;John B. F. de Wit

  • When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII)

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Gabriele Oettingen;Gabriele Oettingen;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Erin P. Hennes

  • Finding the Critical Cue: Implementation Intentions to Change One's Diet Work Best When Tailored to Personally Relevant Reasons for Unhealthy Eating

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Denise T. D. de Ridder;John B. F. de Wit

  • Fear Appeals Motivate Acceptance of Action Recommendations: Evidence for a Positive Bias in the Processing of Persuasive Messages

    Enny H. H. J. Das;John B. F. de Wit;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Breaking Habits With Implementation Intentions: A Test of Underlying Processes

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Denise T. D. De Ridder;John B. F. de Wit

  • The Impact of Fear Appeals on Processing and Acceptance of Action Recommendations

    Natascha de Hoog;Wolfgang Stroebe;John B. F. de Wit

  • Self-regulation in health behavior

    Denise T. D. de Ridder;John B. F. de Wit

  • Community-level changes in condom use and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia: results of repeated behavioural surveillance in 2013-17.

    Martin Holt;Toby Lea;Toby Lea;Limin Mao;Johann Kolstee

  • The contribution of steady and casual partnerships to the incidence of HIV infection among homosexual men in Amsterdam.

    Maria Xiridou;Ronald Geskus;John De Wit;Roel Coutinho

  • Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice.

    Martin S Hagger;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Aleksandra Luszczynska;John de Wit;Yael Benyamini

  • Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and the likelihood of decreased condom use are both associated with unprotected anal intercourse and the perceived likelihood of becoming HIV positive among Australian gay and bisexual men

    Martin Holt;Dean A Murphy;Denton Callander;Jeanne Ellard

  • The potential of peer social norms to shape food intake in adolescents and young adults : a systematic review of effects and moderators

    F Marijn Stok;Emely de Vet;Denise T D de Ridder;John B F de Wit

  • Does viewing explain doing? Assessing the association between sexually explicit materials use and sexual behaviors in a large sample of Dutch adolescents and young adults.

    Gert Martin Hald;Lisette Kuyper;Philippe C.G. Adam;John B.F. de Wit;John B.F. de Wit

  • BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE BARRIERS TO SAFER SEX BETWEEN MEN IN STEADY RELATIONSHIPS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTION STRATEGIES

    Udi Davidovich;John B.F. de Wit;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • Self‐Regulation in Health Behavior: Concepts, Theories, and Central Issues

    Denise T. D. de Ridder;John B. F. de Wit

  • Planning What Not to Eat: Ironic Effects of Implementation Intentions Negating Unhealthy Habits

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Johanna M. F. van Oosten;Denise T. D. de Ridder;John B. F. de Wit

Frequent Co-Authors

Denise T. D. de Ridder
Denise T. D. de Ridder Utrecht University
Aleksandra Luszczynska
Aleksandra Luszczynska University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Wolfgang Stroebe
Wolfgang Stroebe University of Groningen
Marieke A. Adriaanse
Marieke A. Adriaanse Utrecht University
Theo G. M. Sandfort
Theo G. M. Sandfort Columbia University
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Margarida Gaspar de Matos
Margarida Gaspar de Matos University of Lisbon
Gabriele Oettingen
Gabriele Oettingen New York University
Robert A. C. Ruiter
Robert A. C. Ruiter Maastricht University
Jane Wardle
Jane Wardle University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online degree in psychology can open many pathways to a meaningful career in mental health. Across the United States, requirements for becoming a mental health counselor vary by state and city. It’s important to understand the local certification and licensing steps before starting your journey.

For example, if you want to work in Louisiana, you must follow the New Orleans mental health counselor certification requirements, which include a specific number of supervised hours and exams after obtaining your degree. Similarly, those pursuing a counseling career in New York should review the New York City mental health counselor certification requirements.

If you see yourself working in New Jersey, find out how to become a mental health counselor in Newark. Virginia residents can also explore detailed steps to become a mental health counselor in Norfolk.

As requirements differ, choosing the right accredited online degree and planning your educational path early can help you achieve your career goals in counseling, regardless of location.

Best Scientists Citing John de Wit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles