World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4494 4155 319 307 133 6393

Iryna Zablotska publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iryna Zablotska between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iryna Zablotska published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 14 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iryna Zablotska: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 8
2008 7
2009 12
2010 6
2011 6
2012 7
2013 14
2014 6
2015 15
2016 15
2017 11
2018 11
2019 4
2020 3
2021 5
2022 4
2023 3
2024 8
2025 6
Total 155
Download as CSV

Iryna Zablotska publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iryna Zablotska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 133
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Iryna Zablotska D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iryna Zablotska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Iryna Zablotska is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has made substantial contributions to the fields of medicine and social sciences, with a particular focus on infectious diseases and epidemiology. Their research spans topics such as HIV/AIDS interventions, sexual risk behaviors, and the epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Social Sciences

Key subfields within their work are:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Microbiology

The scientist's research addresses several important topics:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
  • Migration, Health and Trauma

Among recent notable publications authored or co-authored by Iryna Zablotska are:

  • Long-term protection from HIV infection with oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in gay and bisexual men: findings from the expanded and extended EPIC-NSW prospective implementation study, 2021, The Lancet HIV
  • Comparison of Trends in Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections Before vs After Initiation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Preferences for Current and Future PrEP Modalities Among PrEP-Experienced Gay and Bisexual Men in Australia, 2021, AIDS and Behavior
  • Potential and demonstrated impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexually transmissible infections, 2020, Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
  • Adherence to daily HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in a large-scale implementation study in New South Wales, Australia, 2021, AIDS

Iryna Zablotska frequently collaborates with several co-authors including:

  • Andrew E. Grulich
  • Benjamin R. Bavinton
  • Fengyi Jin
  • David J. Templeton
  • Stefanie Vaccher

The scientist's research has been published multiple times in several key venues, such as:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Poster presentations
  • Sexual Health
  • AIDS
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • Per-contact probability of HIV transmission in homosexual men in Sydney in the era of HAART.

    Fengyi Jin;James Jansson;Matthew Law;Garrett P Prestage

  • Population-level effectiveness of rapid, targeted, high-coverage roll-out of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: the EPIC-NSW prospective cohort study.

    Andrew E. Grulich;Rebecca Guy;Janaki Amin;Fengyi Jin

  • Coerced first intercourse and reproductive health among adolescent women in Rakai, Uganda.

    Michael A. Koenig;Iryna B. Zablotska;Tom Lutalo;Fred Nalugoda

  • Unprotected anal intercourse, risk reduction behaviours, and subsequent HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men.

    Fengyi Jin;June Crawford;Garrett P Prestage;Iryna Zablotska

  • Alcohol Use, Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Coercion and HIV among Women Aged 15-24 in Rakai, Uganda

    Iryna B. Zablotska;Ronald H. Gray;Michael A. Koenig;David Serwadda

  • Alcohol use before sex and HIV acquisition: a longitudinal study in Rakai, Uganda.

    Iryna B Zablotska;Ronald H Gray;David Serwadda;Fred Nalugoda

  • Community-level changes in condom use and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia: results of repeated behavioural surveillance in 2013-17.

    Martin Holt;Toby Lea;Toby Lea;Limin Mao;Johann Kolstee

  • Gay men's current practice of HIV seroconcordant unprotected anal intercourse: serosorting or seroguessing?

    Iryna B Zablotska;John Imrie;Garrett Prestage;June Crawford

  • Estimating Levels of HIV Testing, HIV Prevention Coverage, HIV Knowledge, and Condom Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries

    Philippe C G Adam;John B F de Wit;Igor Toskin;Bradley M Mathers

  • Changes in Gay Men’s Participation in Gay Community Life: Implications for HIV Surveillance and Research

    Iryna B. Zablotska;Martin Holt;Garrett Prestage

  • Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for hepatitis C in homosexual men: data from two cohorts of HIV-negative and HIV-positive men in Sydney, Australia.

    Fengyi Jin;Garrett Paul Prestage;Gail V Matthews;Iryna Zablotska

  • Use of Illicit Drugs and Erectile Dysfunction Medications and Subsequent HIV Infection among Gay Men in Sydney, Australia

    Garrett Prestage;Fengyi Jin;Susan Kippax;Iryna Zablotska

  • Anal human papillomavirus genotype diversity and co-infection in a community-based sample of homosexual men

    C M Vajdic;M T van Leeuwen;F Jin;G Prestage

  • Homosexual men in Australia: population, distribution and HIV prevalence.

    Garrett Paul. Prestage;Jason Alexander. Ferris;Jeffrey William. Grierson;Rachel Diana. Thorpe

  • High rates of sexually transmitted infections in HIV positive homosexual men: data from two community based cohorts.

    Fengyi Jin;Garrett P Prestage;Iryna Zablotska;Patrick Rawstorne

  • Long-term protection from HIV infection with oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in gay and bisexual men: findings from the expanded and extended EPIC-NSW prospective implementation study

    Andrew E Grulich;Fengyi Jin;Benjamin R Bavinton;Barbara Yeung

  • Behavioural surveillance among gay men in Australia: methods, findings and policy implications for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmissible infections.

    Iryna B Zablotska;Susan Kippax;Andrew Grulich;Martin Holt

  • Amphetamine-type stimulants and HIV infection among men who have sex with men: implications on HIV research and prevention from a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Nga Thi Thu Vu;Lisa Maher;Iryna Zablotska

  • Optimal governance and implementation of vaccination programs to contain the COVID-19 pandemic

    Mahendra Piraveenan;Shailendra Sawleshwarkar;Michael Walsh;Iryna Zablotska

  • PrEP implementation in the Asia-Pacific region: opportunities, implementation and barriers

    Iryna Zablotska;Andrew E Grulich;Nittaya Phanuphak;Tarandeep Anand

  • Use of Viral Load to Negotiate Condom Use Among Gay Men in Sydney, Australia

    Garrett Prestage;Limin Mao;Susan Kippax;Fengyi Jin

  • Trends in agreements between regular partners among gay men in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, Australia.

    Garrett Prestage;Fengyi Jin;Iryna Zablotska;Andrew Grulich

Frequent Co-Authors

Garrett Prestage
Garrett Prestage University of New South Wales
Andrew E. Grulich
Andrew E. Grulich University of New South Wales
Martin Holt
Martin Holt University of New South Wales
John de Wit
John de Wit Utrecht University
Susan Kippax
Susan Kippax University of New South Wales
John Imrie
John Imrie University of the Witwatersrand
John M. Kaldor
John M. Kaldor University of New South Wales
Graham Brown
Graham Brown University of Melbourne
Janaki Amin
Janaki Amin Macquarie University
Christopher K. Fairley
Christopher K. Fairley Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to many rewarding career pathways. With the growth of online education, students now have more flexible options to advance their studies and enter in-demand fields.

For those drawn to social work, accelerated msw programs online offer a faster route to becoming a qualified social worker. Psychology is another popular path; enrolling in a fast psychology degree online can help you launch your career quickly or prepare for graduate studies.

If you are interested in counseling, choosing from cacrep accredited programs online ensures your degree meets industry standards and prepares you for licensure. Additionally, becoming a marriage and family therapist is more accessible with a marriage and family therapist degree online.

These online degree options provide affordability, flexibility, and accreditation—important factors to consider as you plan your educational and career journey in the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Iryna Zablotska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles