World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pratibha Rani

Pratibha Rani

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
8458
World Ranking
3506
National Ranking
30

Pratibha Rani publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pratibha Rani sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 166 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pratibha Rani D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pratibha Rani sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pratibha Rani is a researcher affiliated with KL University in India. Their research primarily focuses on decision sciences and business management, with a significant emphasis on multi-criteria decision making and sustainable supply chain management. The main fields of study in their work include Decision Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting.

The subfields that characterize their research output are Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Artificial Intelligence. This multidisciplinary approach reflects an intersection between quantitative decision methods and applications across management and engineering domains.

Their research topics are centered around:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Quality Function Deployment in Product Design
  • Fuzzy Systems and Optimization

Frequent publication venues for Pratibha Rani include:

  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Sustainability
  • Information Sciences
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Soft Computing

Selected recent papers authored by Pratibha Rani demonstrate their ongoing engagement with fuzzy systems and multi-criteria decision methods applied to environmental and technological challenges:

  • A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection (2020), published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Fermatean fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators-based MULTIMOORA method for electric vehicle charging station selection (2021), published in Expert Systems with Applications

They have frequently collaborated with several co-authors across numerous publications, including:

  • Arunodaya Raj Mishra
  • Ibrahim M. Hezam
  • Adel Fahad Alrasheedi
  • Fausto Cavallaro
  • Abbas Mardani

This network of collaborators reflects shared interests in fuzzy logic, decision-making methodologies, and sustainability applications. These partnerships often feature in journals covering applied computing and decision sciences.

Best Publications

  • A novel VIKOR approach based on entropy and divergence measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets to evaluate renewable energy technologies in India

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Kamal Raj Pardasani;Abbas Mardani

  • Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS approach for the selection of sustainable third-party reverse logistics providers using improved generalized score function.

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Kiran Pandey

  • A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Abbas Mardani;Fausto Cavallaro

  • Fermatean fuzzy Heronian mean operators and MEREC‐based additive ratio assessment method: An application to food waste treatment technology selection

    Unknown

  • Fermatean fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators-based MULTIMOORA method for electric vehicle charging station selection

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

  • A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Kamal Raj Pardasani;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Abbas Mardani;Pratibha Rani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

  • A Decision Support System for Assessing and Prioritizing Sustainable Urban Transportation in Metaverse

    Unknown

  • An extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method based on new similarity measures to evaluate the renewable energy sources

    Unknown

  • A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak

    Abbas Mardani;Mahyar Kamali Saraji;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • Interval-valued fermatean fuzzy sets with multi-criteria weighted aggregated sum product assessment-based decision analysis framework

    Unknown

  • Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method.

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector

    Yongfeng Cui;Wei Liu;Pratibha Rani;Melfi Alrasheedi

  • COPRAS method based on interval-valued hesitant Fermatean fuzzy sets and its application in selecting desalination technology

    Unknown

  • Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy WASPAS Method: Application in Reservoir Flood Control Management Policy

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • A Hybrid Intuitionistic Fuzzy-MEREC-RS-DNMA Method for Assessing the Alternative Fuel Vehicles with Sustainability Perspectives

    Unknown

  • New complex proportional assessment approach using Einstein aggregation operators and improved score function for interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy sets

    Unknown

  • Novel Multi-Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy SWARA–COPRAS Approach for Sustainability Evaluation of the Bioenergy Production Process

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Kiran Pandey;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel Pythagorean fuzzy combined compromise solution framework for the assessment of medical waste treatment technology

    Peide Liu;Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

  • Multi-criteria food waste treatment method selection using single-valued neutrosophic-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA framework

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Raghunathan Krishankumar;K. S. Ravichandran

  • Extended Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on Similarity Measure for Sustainable Recycling Partner Selection

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Ghasem Rezaei;Huchang Liao

  • Solving renewable energy source selection problems using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based integrated decision-making approach

    R. Krishankumar;S. Supraja Nimmagadda;Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

  • An extended fuzzy decision-making framework using hesitant fuzzy sets for the drug selection to treat the mild symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Raghunathan Krishankumar;K. S. Ravichandran

  • Hesitant Fuzzy SWARA-Complex Proportional Assessment Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection (HF-SWARA-COPRAS)

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Raghunathan Krishankumar;Abbas Mardani

  • Shapley divergence measures with VIKOR method for multi-attribute decision-making problems

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • Healthcare evaluation in hazardous waste recycling using novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information based on complex proportional assessment method

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Abbas Mardani;Kamal Raj Pardasani

  • Multi-criteria weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for fuel technology selection using q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

Frequent Co-Authors

Arunodaya Raj Mishra
Arunodaya Raj Mishra ITM University
Abbas Mardani
Abbas Mardani Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Amir H. Gandomi
Amir H. Gandomi University of Technology Sydney
Dalia Streimikiene
Dalia Streimikiene Lithuanian Energy Institute
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Kannan Govindan
Kannan Govindan University of Adelaide
Huchang Liao
Huchang Liao Sichuan University
Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade
Samarjit Kar
Samarjit Kar National Institute of Technology Durgapur
Xindong Peng
Xindong Peng National University of Defense Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to diverse degree and career options both online and offline. Many students today are seeking flexibility and affordability, making accelerated computer science degree online programs an attractive choice. These programs allow you to finish your studies faster and start your career sooner.

If you're interested in the intersection of technology and the environment, you might look into related fields such as environmental science or engineering. Not sure where it leads? Discover what can i do with an environmental science degree—from working in sustainability to research roles.

Engineering is another rewarding pathway, closely linked to computer science. You can pursue an online environmental engineering degree or find your niche with online mechanical engineering degrees. These related programs offer the flexibility to build technical skills for growing industries while learning remotely.

Best Scientists Citing Pratibha Rani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles