World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Arunodaya Raj Mishra

Arunodaya Raj Mishra

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 54 231 231 9 9 169 7605
Computer Science 61 3140 3048 27 27 184 9670

Arunodaya Raj Mishra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arunodaya Raj Mishra between 2016 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arunodaya Raj Mishra published across 11 years, from 2016 to 2026, averaging 18.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2023. 18 of the 204 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2016 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2023. 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
2016 2026

204 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arunodaya Raj Mishra: publications per year, 2016 to 2026
Year Publications
2016 7
2017 2
2018 3
2019 8
2020 24
2021 34
2022 38
2023 42
2024 28
2025 17
2026 1
Total 204
Download as CSV

Arunodaya Raj Mishra publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arunodaya Raj Mishra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583 184
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Arunodaya Raj Mishra D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arunodaya Raj Mishra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337 61
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Arunodaya Raj Mishra is affiliated with ITM University in India and has an established record in the areas of decision sciences, business management, and engineering. Their research contributions focus primarily on multi-criteria decision making, sustainable supply chain management, and optimization techniques.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Engineering

Within these fields, the subfields of study they frequently engage with are:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Their research topics emphasize:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Smart Parking Systems Research
  • Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
  • Quality Function Deployment in Product Design

Arunodaya Raj Mishra has authored multiple research articles, some of the recent notable papers include:

  • "Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS approach for the selection of sustainable third-party reverse logistics providers using improved generalized score function," published in 2021 in the Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
  • "A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures," published in 2020 in the Journal of Cleaner Production

Aside from Mishra's own papers, closely associated co-authors in their research collaborations are:

  • Pratibha Rani
  • Ibrahim M. Hezam
  • Fausto Cavallaro
  • Adel Fahad Alrasheedi
  • Abbas Mardani

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Sustainability
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Sciences
  • Soft Computing

Best Publications

  • A novel VIKOR approach based on entropy and divergence measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets to evaluate renewable energy technologies in India

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Kamal Raj Pardasani;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Abbas Mardani;Fausto Cavallaro

  • Fermatean fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators-based MULTIMOORA method for electric vehicle charging station selection

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

  • A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Kamal Raj Pardasani;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Abbas Mardani;Pratibha Rani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

  • A Decision Support System for Assessing and Prioritizing Sustainable Urban Transportation in Metaverse

    Unknown

  • An extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method based on new similarity measures to evaluate the renewable energy sources

    Unknown

  • A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak

    Abbas Mardani;Mahyar Kamali Saraji;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • Interval-valued fermatean fuzzy sets with multi-criteria weighted aggregated sum product assessment-based decision analysis framework

    Unknown

  • Evaluate sustainable human resource management in the manufacturing companies using a novel extended pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-TOPSIS method

    Unknown

  • Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method.

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • COPRAS method based on interval-valued hesitant Fermatean fuzzy sets and its application in selecting desalination technology

    Unknown

  • Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy WASPAS Method: Application in Reservoir Flood Control Management Policy

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani

  • A Hybrid Intuitionistic Fuzzy-MEREC-RS-DNMA Method for Assessing the Alternative Fuel Vehicles with Sustainability Perspectives

    Unknown

  • New complex proportional assessment approach using Einstein aggregation operators and improved score function for interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy sets

    Unknown

  • Novel Multi-Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy SWARA–COPRAS Approach for Sustainability Evaluation of the Bioenergy Production Process

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Kiran Pandey;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel Pythagorean fuzzy combined compromise solution framework for the assessment of medical waste treatment technology

    Peide Liu;Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

  • Multi-criteria food waste treatment method selection using single-valued neutrosophic-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA framework

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Raghunathan Krishankumar;K. S. Ravichandran

  • New Divergence and Entropy Measures for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets on Edge Detection

    Mohd Dilshad Ansari;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Farhina Tabassum Ansari

  • Solving renewable energy source selection problems using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based integrated decision-making approach

    R. Krishankumar;S. Supraja Nimmagadda;Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra

  • Multi-criteria assessment of cellular mobile telephone service providers using intuitionistic fuzzy WASPAS method with similarity measures

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Rahul Kumar Singh;Deepak Motwani

  • An extended fuzzy decision-making framework using hesitant fuzzy sets for the drug selection to treat the mild symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Raghunathan Krishankumar;K. S. Ravichandran

  • Hesitant Fuzzy SWARA-Complex Proportional Assessment Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection (HF-SWARA-COPRAS)

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Raghunathan Krishankumar;Abbas Mardani

  • Healthcare evaluation in hazardous waste recycling using novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information based on complex proportional assessment method

    Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Pratibha Rani;Abbas Mardani;Kamal Raj Pardasani

Frequent Co-Authors

Pratibha Rani
Pratibha Rani KL University
Abbas Mardani
Abbas Mardani Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Samarjit Kar
Samarjit Kar National Institute of Technology Durgapur
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Huchang Liao
Huchang Liao Sichuan University
Dalia Streimikiene
Dalia Streimikiene Lithuanian Energy Institute
Kannan Govindan
Kannan Govindan University of Adelaide
Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade
Amir H. Gandomi
Amir H. Gandomi University of Technology Sydney
Xindong Peng
Xindong Peng National University of Defense Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers a range of online degree options tailored to different career goals and schedules. Many students choose to begin their journey with an associate’s credential, and associates degrees online can be completed in less than a year, making them ideal for quick entry into the tech workforce.

For those eager to advance their qualifications without spending years in school, accelerated doctoral pathways are gaining popularity. Options like the shortest edd program online allow students to earn this advanced credential faster than traditional programs, opening doors to leadership and research roles.

Affordability is a major concern for many prospective students. Fortunately, there are cheap phd programs online which make it easier for learners to pursue top-tier education without incurring heavy student debt.

Finally, for those interested in combining technical and business skills, consider exploring online business schools as a way to gain versatile expertise valuable across tech and management careers. With flexible online pathways, you can find a program that fits your ambitions and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Arunodaya Raj Mishra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles