World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025
Award Badge
Business and Management
Iran
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 65 117 117 15 15 217 16297
Business and Management 70 303 283 1 1 236 23295

Abbas Mardani publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Abbas Mardani between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Abbas Mardani published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 15.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2020. 23 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2020. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 8 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 4 publications
2009 2025

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Abbas Mardani: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 2
2013 3
2014 1
2015 8
2016 10
2017 18
2018 34
2019 29
2020 44
2021 33
2022 24
2023 39
2024 19
2025 4
Total 270
Download as CSV

Abbas Mardani publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abbas Mardani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 235–239 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 236 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28 236
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Abbas Mardani D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abbas Mardani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20 70
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Iran Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Abbas Mardani is affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Business, Management, and Accounting, with a significant number of publications in related subfields and topics.

Their main subfields of study include:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing
  • Artificial Intelligence

Key topics addressed in their work are:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

Mardani's extensive publication record shows frequent contributions to several journals, including:

  • Journal of Business Research
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Sustainability
  • Symmetry
  • Annals of Operations Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Abbas Mardani include:

  • Opinion Paper: "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023, International Journal of Information Management)
  • A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis on sustainable supply chain management: Future research directions (2020, Journal of Cleaner Production)
  • Does digital transformation improve the firm's performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia (2023, Journal of Business Research)
  • Investigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality (2020, Journal of Environmental Management)
  • Digital finance and enterprise financing constraints: Structural characteristics and mechanism identification (2023, Journal of Business Research)

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Arunodaya Raj Mishra
  • Pratibha Rani
  • Fausto Cavallaro
  • Melfi Alrasheedi
  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

Best Publications

  • Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014

    Abbas Mardani;Ahmad Jusoh;Khalil M D Nor;Zainab Khalifah

  • Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014

    Abbas Mardani;Ahmad Jusoh;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

  • A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency

    Abbas Mardani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Dalia Streimikiene;Ahmad Jusoh

  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017.

    Abbas Mardani;Dalia Streimikiene;Fausto Cavallaro;Nanthakumar Loganathan

  • VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications

    Abbas Mardani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Kannan Govindan;Aslan Amat Senin

  • The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance

    Noor Aslinda Abu Seman;Kannan Govindan;Abbas Mardani;Norhayati Zakuan

  • Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Abbas Mardani;Zenonas Turskis;Ahmad Jusoh

  • Does digital transformation improve the firm’s performance? From the perspective of digitalization paradox and managerial myopia

    Unknown

  • A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis on sustainable supply chain management: Future research directions

    Syed Abdul Rehman Khan;Syed Abdul Rehman Khan;Zhang Yu;Heris Golpira;Arshian Sharif

  • A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments

    Abbas Mardani;Mehrbakhsh Nilashi;Mehrbakhsh Nilashi;Norhayati Zakuan;Nanthakumar Loganathan

  • A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015

    Abbas Mardani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zainab Khalifah;Norhayati Zakuan

  • Investigating the effects of renewable energy on international trade and environmental quality.

    Syed Abdul Rehman Khan;Zhang Yu;Amine Belhadi;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design

    Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee;Abbas Mardani;Zahra Dashtian;Mehdi Soltani

  • Application of MCDM Methods in Sustainability Engineering: A Literature Review 2008–2018

    Mirko Stojčić;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Dragan Pamučar;Željko Stević

  • Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches

    Abbas Mardani;Ahmad Jusoh;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Fausto Cavallaro

  • A review of greenhouse gas emission profiles, dynamics, and climate change mitigation efforts across the key climate change players

    Xiaosong Zheng;Dalia Streimikiene;Tomas Balezentis;Abbas Mardani

  • A novel VIKOR approach based on entropy and divergence measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets to evaluate renewable energy technologies in India

    Pratibha Rani;Arunodaya Raj Mishra;Kamal Raj Pardasani;Abbas Mardani

  • Community attachment, tourism impacts, quality of life and residents’ support for sustainable tourism development

    Sadraddin Eslami;Zainab Khalifah;Abbas Mardani;Dalia Streimikiene

  • Environmental information disclosure and corporate innovation: The “Inverted U-shaped” regulating effect of media attention

    Unknown

  • The impact of enterprise risk management on competitive advantage by moderating role of information technology

    Parvaneh Saeidi;Sayyedeh Parisa Saeidi;Saudah Sofian;Sayedeh Parastoo Saeidi

  • Evaluation of green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research

    Abbas Mardani;Devika Kannan;Robert E. Hooker;Seckin Ozkul

  • Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: a systematic review of the state of the art literature

    Abbas Mardani;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zainab Khalifah;Ahmad Jusoh

Frequent Co-Authors

Dalia Streimikiene
Dalia Streimikiene Lithuanian Energy Institute
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Ahmad Jusoh
Ahmad Jusoh University of Technology Malaysia
Huchang Liao
Huchang Liao Sichuan University
Othman Ibrahim
Othman Ibrahim University of Technology Malaysia
Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade
Kannan Govindan
Kannan Govindan University of Adelaide
Željko Stević
Željko Stević University of East Sarajevo
Syed Abdul Rehman Khan
Syed Abdul Rehman Khan Xuzhou University of Technology
Zenonas Turskis
Zenonas Turskis Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees connected to Business and Management provides flexible learning and new career opportunities. Students interested in healthcare can pursue the cheapest online healthcare management degree to gain practical skills in overseeing hospitals or clinics. For further specialization, the most affordable online mha programs offer advanced training in healthcare leadership, equipping graduates for executive positions.

Accounting is another area closely linked to business management. Earning the cheapest accredited online accounting degree prepares students for essential roles in finance and auditing, vital for any organization’s success. Additionally, as technology shapes business decisions, pursuing an online ai degree can open doors to tech-driven roles, blending business insight with cutting-edge innovation.

These online degree pathways not only provide affordability but also prepare students to meet evolving workforce demands across both traditional and emerging industries.

Best Scientists Citing Abbas Mardani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles