World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 79 565 534 2 2 205 24859

Zenonas Turskis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zenonas Turskis between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zenonas Turskis published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2008. 21 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2008. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 7 publications 2025: 14 publications
1997 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zenonas Turskis: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 5
2006 5
2007 4
2008 20
2009 5
2010 15
2011 9
2012 10
2013 20
2014 15
2015 11
2016 11
2017 16
2018 11
2019 17
2020 10
2021 9
2022 11
2023 1
2024 7
2025 14
Total 230
Download as CSV

Zenonas Turskis publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zenonas Turskis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 205 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403 205
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Zenonas Turskis D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zenonas Turskis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28 79
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Zenonas Turskis is affiliated with Vilnius Gediminas Technical University in Lithuania. Their research contributions focus primarily on the fields of Engineering and Decision Sciences, with notable activity in subfields such as Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

The scientist's research topics include Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Construction Project Management and Performance, Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Technology Assessment and Management, Optimization and Mathematical Programming, Sustainable Building Design and Assessment, and Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Turskis include:

  • Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC), 2021, Symmetry
  • Modelling Procedure for the Selection of Steel Pipes Supplier by Applying Fuzzy AHP Method, 2020, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences Theory and Applications
  • A New Hybrid MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on a Novel Grey PIPRECIA and Grey OCRA Methods, 2020, Mathematics
  • Grey Best-Worst Method for Multiple Experts Multiple Criteria Decision Making Under Uncertainty, 2020, Informatica
  • An integrated assessment of the municipal buildings' use including sustainability criteria, 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Sustainability
  • Informatica
  • Symmetry
  • Oeconomia Copernicana
  • International Journal of Computers Communications & Control

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their research. Frequent coauthors include Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Vaida Zemlickienė, Jonas Šaparauskas, Jurgita Antuchevičienė, and Jurgis Zagorskas.

Best Publications

  • Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara)

    Violeta Keršuliene;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Laya Olfat;Zenonas Turskis

  • Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment

    E. K. Zavadskas;Z. Turskis;J. Antucheviciene;A. Zakarevicius

  • A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems

    Morteza Yazdani;Pascale Zaraté;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Simona Kildienė

  • Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC)

    Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • Risk assessment of construction projects

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jolanta Tamošaitiene

  • A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Abbas Mardani;Zenonas Turskis;Ahmad Jusoh

  • SELECTION OF THE EFFECTIVE DWELLING HOUSE WALLS BY APPLYING ATTRIBUTES VALUES DETERMINED AT INTERVALS

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Artūras Kaklauskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jolanta Tamošaitiene

  • Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Maghsoud Amiri;Zenonas Turskis

  • Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Arturas Kaklauskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jolanta Tamošaitienė

  • Multi‐objective decision‐making for road design

    Willem Karel M. Brauers;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Friedel Peldschus;Zenonas Turskis

  • Integrated Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Architect Selection

    Violeta Keršulienė;Zenonas Turskis

  • Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method

    E.K. Zavadskas;Z. Turskis;T. Vilutiene

  • A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection

    Zenonas Turskis;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Natalja Kosareva

  • Multi-attribute Assessment of Road Design Solutions by Using the COPRAS Method

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Artiras Kaklauskas;Friedel Peldschus;Zenonas Turskis

  • Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Kannan Govindan;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Zenonas Turskis

  • Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jolanta Tamošaitiene;Valerija Marina

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Jurgita Antucheviciene
Jurgita Antucheviciene Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Maghsoud Amiri
Maghsoud Amiri Allameh Tabataba'i University
Arturas Kaklauskas
Arturas Kaklauskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Dragisa Stanujkic
Dragisa Stanujkic University of Belgrade
Željko Stević
Željko Stević University of East Sarajevo
Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji
Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji University of Birmingham
Florentin Smarandache
Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico
Abbas Mardani
Abbas Mardani Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Huchang Liao
Huchang Liao Sichuan University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open new doors for those interested in Engineering and Technology careers in the USA. Related fields, such as business administration and organizational leadership, complement technical expertise and equip you for modern workplaces.

An online ba business administration is a popular choice for students seeking to enhance their management skills alongside technical knowledge. For those aiming for leadership roles, a masters organizational leadership online program can help you develop essential soft skills valued by employers in tech industries.

Engineering and Technology professionals may also benefit from advanced business programs. Consider online mba programs in operations management to build expertise in optimizing processes and resources within technical organizations. If you're concerned about entrance exams, there are flexible no gmat online mba options that allow you to earn a graduate degree without the need for standardized test scores.

Combining technology studies with business-oriented degrees can help you stand out in a rapidly evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Zenonas Turskis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles