World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
56
Citations
12156
World Ranking
2812
National Ranking
3

Jurgita Antucheviciene publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jurgita Antucheviciene sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 189 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jurgita Antucheviciene D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jurgita Antucheviciene sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jurgita Antucheviciene is affiliated with Vilnius Gediminas Technical University in Lithuania. Their research primarily focuses on decision sciences and engineering, with notable contributions across management science and operations research, as well as building and construction. Antucheviciene's work spans multiple subfields, including strategy and management, control and systems engineering, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The scientist's academic output covers several main topics within the field, reflecting a sustained interest in methods and applications relevant to both theoretical and practical challenges. These topics include:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • BIM and Construction Integration
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

Antucheviciene has contributed to the literature through publications in various prominent venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Sustainability
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Symmetry
  • Buildings
  • International Journal of Strategic Property Management

The scientist has co-authored extensively with several researchers, with frequent collaborators being:

  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas (31 joint works)
  • Maghsoud Amiri (12 joint works)
  • Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee (11 joint works)
  • Seyed Meysam Mousavi (11 joint works)
  • Mohammad Khalilzadeh (11 joint works)

Recent papers authored by or involving Antucheviciene cover a range of topics, reflecting interdisciplinary engagements:

  • "Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC)", 2021, published in Symmetry
  • "Digitalization as a Strategic Means of Achieving Sustainable Efficiencies in Construction Management: A Critical Review", 2021, published in Sustainability
  • "An integrated approach for a sustainable supplier selection based on Industry 4.0 concept", 2021, published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • "A novel dynamic credit risk evaluation method using data envelopment analysis with common weights and combination of multi-attribute decision-making methods", 2021, published in Computers & Operations Research
  • "A state-of-the-art survey of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS): Developments and applications", 2023, published in Expert Systems with Applications

Best Publications

  • Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment

    E. K. Zavadskas;Z. Turskis;J. Antucheviciene;A. Zakarevicius

  • Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC)

    Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • A Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection

    Zenonas Turskis;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Natalja Kosareva

  • Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF)

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha;Shide Sadat Hashemi

  • Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Kannan Govindan;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Zenonas Turskis

  • Evaluation of Ranking Accuracy in Multi-Criteria Decisions

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Algimantas Zakarevicius;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • Multiple criteria evaluation of rural building's regeneration alternatives

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • Fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria market segment evaluation

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Reyhaneh Hooshmand

  • A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Tatjana Vilutiene;Hojjat Adeli

  • Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antuchevičienė

  • Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: a review of MADM approaches

    Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • HYBRID MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Hojjat Adeli;Zenonas Turskis

  • Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology☆

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Jonas Šaparauskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • Hybrid SWARA-COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an iranian case study

    Alireza Valipour;Nordin Yahaya;Norhazilan Md Noor;Jurgita Antuchevičienė

  • The Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method for Group Decision Making in Engineering

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Jurgita Antucheviciene;Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha;Shide Sadat Hashemi

  • Selecting a contractor by using a novel method for multiple attribute analysis: Weighted aggregated sum product assessment with grey values (WASPAS-G)

    Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Jurgita Antucheviciene

  • Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

    Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee;Maghsoud Amiri;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis

  • Measuring Congruence of Ranking Results Applying Particular MCDM Methods

    Jurgita Antucheviciene;Algimantas Zakarevicius;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Zenonas Turskis
Zenonas Turskis Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Maghsoud Amiri
Maghsoud Amiri Allameh Tabataba'i University
Huchang Liao
Huchang Liao Sichuan University
Seyed Meysam Mousavi
Seyed Meysam Mousavi Shahed University
Hojjat Adeli
Hojjat Adeli The Ohio State University
Madjid Tavana
Madjid Tavana La Salle University
Mohamed Marzouk
Mohamed Marzouk Cairo University
M. Reza Hosseini
M. Reza Hosseini Deakin University
Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your options beyond engineering and technology can open up a world of career possibilities in the USA. Many students are now exploring online degrees to enhance their skills and marketability—often with flexible admission requirements and lower costs.

If you’re seeking leadership opportunities, consider an mba programs online no gmat required. These programs eliminate the traditional test barriers and let professionals advance their education with ease.

Affordability is another major concern. Programs like mba under 25k allow you to earn a reputable business degree without excessive debt, making quality education more accessible than ever.

As the digital landscape evolves, fields such as social media are growing rapidly. A degrees in social media can prepare you for dynamic careers in digital marketing, branding, and online communication.

For those interested in people-focused industries, hospitality management courses online offer fast pathways into roles in hotels, tourism, and event management—industries that value technical and leadership skills alike.

By combining your engineering or technology background with another online degree, you can broaden your expertise and unlock new career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jurgita Antucheviciene

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles