World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4875 4519 27 24 124 7243

Susan Schenk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susan Schenk between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susan Schenk published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1994. 2 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1994. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susan Schenk: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 0
1985 4
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 5
1992 2
1993 6
1994 7
1995 0
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 5
2007 4
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 6
2012 3
2013 4
2014 4
2015 5
2016 5
2017 3
2018 3
2019 2
2020 4
2021 3
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
Total 128
Download as CSV

Susan Schenk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Schenk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 124
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Susan Schenk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Schenk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Overview

Susan Schenk is affiliated with Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, focusing primarily on neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, toxicology, and molecular biology.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Forensic toxicology and drug analysis
  • Psychedelics and drug studies
  • Opioid use disorder treatment
  • Substance abuse treatment and outcomes
  • Prenatal substance exposure effects
  • Anxiety, depression, psychometrics, and cognitive processes

Recent papers by Susan Schenk include:

  • "Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA): Serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms related to its use and misuse," 2021, Journal of Neurochemistry
  • "Treating opioid use disorders in the criminal justice system with pharmacotherapy," 2020, Forensic Science International Mind and Law
  • "Cognitive and affective neuroscience: approaches and applications," 2021, Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand

The frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Susan Schenk are:

  • Quenten Highgate
  • Ross van de Wetering
  • Jan Vorster
  • Sophie Geyrhofer
  • Robert A. Keyzers

Their publications appear often in the following venues:

  • Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Journal of Neurochemistry
  • Forensic Science International Mind and Law
  • Metabolomics

Schenk's research contributes mainly to advancing knowledge in neuroscience, with a strong focus on understanding the biochemical and behavioral implications of various substances, including opioids and psychedelics. The scientist has also contributed to forensic toxicology and the development of treatment strategies for substance use disorders.

In 2011, Susan Schenk was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand.

Best Publications

  • Preexposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine.

    Brian A. Horger;Keith Shelton;Susan Schenk

  • Preexposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine.

    Brian A. Horger;Melissa K. Giles;Susan Schenk

  • Cocaine self-administration in rats influenced by environmental conditions: implications for the etiology of drug abuse

    Susan Schenk;Gary Lacelle;Kathleen Gorman;Zalman Amit

  • U69593, a kappa-opioid agonist, decreases cocaine self-administration and decreases cocaine-produced drug-seeking.

    S. Schenk;Brian Partridge;Toni S. Shippenberg

  • Supersensitivity to the reinforcing effects of cocaine following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions to the medial prefrontal cortex in rats.

    Susan Schenk;Brian A. Horger;Rachel Peltier;Keith Shelton

  • Effects of serotonergic manipulations on cocaine self-administration in rats.

    Rachel Peltier;Susan Schenk

  • Development, maintenance and temporal pattern of self-administration maintained by ecstasy (MDMA) in rats.

    Susan Schenk;David Gittings;Malcolm Johnstone;Evangeline Daniela

  • Sensitization and Tolerance in Psychostimulant Self-Administration

    Susan Schenk;Brian Partridge

  • Development and expression of sensitization to cocaine's reinforcing properties: role of NMDA receptors

    Susan Schenk;Albert Valadez;Carol McNamara;David T. House

  • Subjective responses to initial experience with cocaine: an exploration of the incentive–sensitization theory of drug abuse

    Nadine M. Lambert;Marsha McLeod;Susan Schenk

  • Cocaine-seeking produced by experimenter-administered drug injections: dose-effect relationships in rats.

    Susan Schenk;Brian Partridge

  • Caffeine exposure sensitizes rats to the reinforcing effects of cocaine.

    Brian A. Horger;Paul J. Wellman;Annie Morien;Becky T. Davies

  • Persistence of the ability of amphetamine preexposure to facilitate acquisition of cocaine self-administration.

    Albert Valadez;Susan Schenk

  • Age-dependent effects of isolation housing on the self-administration of ethanol in laboratory rats

    Susan Schenk;Kathleen Gorman;Zalman Amit

  • Variability in subjective responses to cocaine: initial experiences of college students.

    Emily S. Davidson;John F. Finch;Susan Schenk

  • Effect of SCH 23390 on (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine hyperactivity and self-administration in rats

    Evangelene Daniela;Katie Brennan;Dave Gittings;Lincoln Hely

  • AMPA Receptors as Therapeutic Targets for Neurological Disorders.

    Kevin Lee;Lucy Goodman;Chantelle Fourie;Susan Schenk

  • An examination of heroin conditioning in preferred and nonpreferred environments and in differentially housed mature and immature rats

    S. Schenk;F. Ellison;T. Hunt;Z. Amit

  • Blockade of the acquisition of cocaine self-administration by the NMDA antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine).

    S. Schenk;A. Valadez;C.M. Worley;C. McNamara

  • Reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-taking behavior by cocaine and caffeine.

    Christina M. Worley;Albert Valadez;Susan Schenk

  • MDMA self-administration in rats: acquisition, progressive ratio responding and serotonin transporter binding.

    Susan Schenk;Lincoln Hely;Barbara Lake;Evangelene Daniela

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Shizgal
Peter Shizgal Concordia University
Toni S. Shippenberg
Toni S. Shippenberg National Institute on Drug Abuse
Paul J. Wellman
Paul J. Wellman Texas A&M University
Stuart A. Kinner
Stuart A. Kinner University of Melbourne
Raimondo Bruno
Raimondo Bruno University of Tasmania
Jean-Christophe Cassel
Jean-Christophe Cassel University of Strasbourg
Nancy R. Zahniser
Nancy R. Zahniser University of Colorado Denver
Andrew C. Parrott
Andrew C. Parrott Swansea University
Rapson Gomez
Rapson Gomez Federation University Australia
Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree can significantly impact your future opportunities. When evaluating programs, consider not just the academic curriculum but also factors like career placement rates, specializations, and the potential for online study. For example, exploring the most valuable psychology degrees in South Carolina can provide insight into state-specific options, while regional highlights such as the most valuable psychology programs in Tampa help students find strong local opportunities.

For a broader overview, reviewing the most valuable psychology programs in the US can guide you toward nationally recognized programs with the highest return on investment. Additionally, students interested in supporting individuals and communities may want to consider social work as a related career. Many institutions now offer flexible online options, such as the best online social work bachelor's degrees in the US, which can open doors to diverse pathways in counseling, community outreach, and human services. Exploring these related degrees and career paths ensures students can make informed choices that align with their goals and lifestyle needs.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Schenk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles