World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
16600
World Ranking
2290
National Ranking
1330

David C.S. Roberts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C.S. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David C.S. Roberts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C.S. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C.S. Roberts is affiliated with Wake Forest University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including arts and humanities, medicine, and physics and astronomy. Their work also touches on various subfields such as literature and literary theory, museology, orthopedics and sports medicine, atomic and molecular physics and optics, and language and linguistics.

The scientist's scholarly contributions include several topics of study, notably German literature and culture studies, libraries and information services, theoretical and computational physics, tendon structure and treatment, sports injuries and prevention, shoulder injury and treatment, and ecology, conservation, and geographical studies.

Roberts has produced numerous publications across a variety of venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Medicina
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Physical Review Letters
  • Sensors

The scientist has coauthored work with several frequent collaborators. These include Christine Magerski, Aashish A. Clerk, Håkan Alfredson, Markus Waldén, and Christoph Spang.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Roberts cover a range of disciplines and topics:

  • Exact Solution of the Infinite-Range Dissipative Transverse-Field Ising Model, 2023, Physical Review Letters
  • Hold-down as an alternative to unit dose in cocaine self-administration experiments: Characterization using a progressive ratio schedule, 2020, Psychopharmacology

Other notable recent papers relevant to the broader research network include:

  • End-Use Load Profiles for the U.S. Building Stock, 2021, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Evaluation of Activated Carbon and Platinum Black as High-Capacitance Materials for Platinum Electrodes, 2022, Sensors
  • The not-so-natural herb: a case of exogenous Cushing syndrome, 2023, The Medical Journal of Australia

Roberts has also contributed to book publications with various academic presses. Titles include:

  • An Apology for the Life of Mr Colley Cibber, Comedian and Late Patentee of the Theatre Royal, 2022, Cambridge University Press
  • Science Fiction and Narrative Form, 2023, Bloomsbury Academic eBooks
  • Umgekehrte Mimesis, 2023, Velbrück Wissenschaft eBooks

Best Publications

  • Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy

    Nicole R. Richardson;David C.S. Roberts

  • Extinction and recovery of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens.

    D.C.S. Roberts;G.F. Koob;P. Klonoff;H.C. Fibiger

  • On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine.

    David C.S. Roberts;Michael E. Corcoran;Hans C. Fibiger

  • Disruption of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the ventral tegmental area in rats

    David C.S. Roberts;George F. Koob

  • A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement.

    Jennifer M Arnold;David C.S Roberts

  • The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats

    D. C. S. Roberts;S. A. L. Bennett;G. J. Vickers

  • GABAB receptor agonists for the treatment of drug addiction: a review of recent findings

    Michael S. Cousins;David C.S. Roberts;Harriet de Wit

  • Disruption of cocaine and heroin self-administration following kainic acid lesions of the nucleus accumbens

    Kathy A. Zito;G. Vickers;David C.S. Roberts

  • Dopaminergic antagonism within the nucleus accumbens or the amygdala produces differential effects on intravenous cocaine self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement

    Alison McGregor;David C.S. Roberts

  • Self-administration of cocaine on a progressive ratio schedule in rats: dose-response relationship and effect of haloperidol pretreatment

    David C. S. Roberts;Elliot A. Loh;Gary Vickers

  • Break-points on a progressive ratio schedule reinforced by intravenous cocaine increase following depletion of forebrain serotonin.

    Elliot A. Loh;David C. S. Roberts

  • The hypocretin–orexin system regulates cocaine self‐administration via actions on the mesolimbic dopamine system

    Rodrigo A. España;Erik B. Oleson;Jason L. Locke;Bethany R. Brookshire

  • The dorsal tegmental noradrenergic projection: an analysis of its role in maze learning.

    David C. Roberts;Marion T. Price;Hans C. Fibiger

  • Baclofen attenuates the reinforcing effects of cocaine in rats

    David C.S. Roberts;Monique M. Andrews;Gary J. Vickers

  • A POTENTIAL ROLE FOR GABAB AGONISTS IN THE TREATMENT OF PSYCHOSTIMULANT ADDICTION

    Karen Brebner;Anna Rose Childress;David C. S. Roberts

  • Atypical neuroleptics increase self-administration of cocaine: An evaluation of a behavioural screen for antipsychotic activity

    David C. S. Roberts;Gary Vickers

  • Receptor–receptor interactions within receptor mosaics. Impact on neuropsychopharmacology

    K. Fuxe;D. Marcellino;A. Rivera;Z. Diaz-Cabiale

  • Fluoxetine pretreatment reduces breaking points on a progressive ratio schedule reinforced by intravenous cocaine self-administration in the rat.

    Nicole R. Richardson;David C.S. Roberts

  • Effect of baclofen on cocaine self-administration in rats reinforced under fixed-ratio 1 and progressive-ratio schedules.

    Karen Brebner;Rachel Phelan;David C. S. Roberts

  • Hypocretin 1/orexin A in the ventral tegmental area enhances dopamine responses to cocaine and promotes cocaine self-administration

    Rodrigo A. España;James R. Melchior;David C. S. Roberts;Sara R. Jones

  • How fast and how often: The pharmacokinetics of drug use are decisive in addiction.

    Florence Allain;Ellie-Anna Minogianis;David C.S. Roberts;Anne-Noël Samaha

  • Baclofen suppression of cocaine self-administration: demonstration using a discrete trials procedure.

    D. C. S. Roberts;Monique M. Andrews

Frequent Co-Authors

Drake Morgan
Drake Morgan University of Florida
Hans C. Fibiger
Hans C. Fibiger University of British Columbia
Sara R. Jones
Sara R. Jones Wake Forest University
Rodrigo A. España
Rodrigo A. España Drexel University
Erin S. Calipari
Erin S. Calipari Vanderbilt University
Anna Rose Childress
Anna Rose Childress University of Pennsylvania
George F. Koob
George F. Koob National Institute on Drug Abuse
Charles P. O'Brien
Charles P. O'Brien University of Pennsylvania
Glen B. Baker
Glen B. Baker University of Alberta
Kjell Fuxe
Kjell Fuxe Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore the field of psychology in the USA, it’s important to consider the wide variety of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students interested in helping others pursue further specialization through applied behavior analysis (ABA), which opens doors to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

BCBA certification offers strong career prospects, and the education requirements can vary by location. For example, those interested in working in Arizona should review the Scottsdale bcba education requirements. If you plan to study or work in the Pacific Northwest, make sure to understand the Seattle bcba education requirements as well as the bcba certification requirements in Spokane.

Alternatively, students interested in the Midwest can explore the bcba certification requirements in St. Louis. These links outline essential steps such as coursework, supervised experience, and exam processes. Online degree programs often offer flexible options to meet these credentialing standards, making it easier for students nationwide to pursue advanced careers in behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing David C.S. Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles