World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
128
Citations
47379
World Ranking
2743
National Ranking
106

Hans C. Fibiger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans C. Fibiger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 379 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hans C. Fibiger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans C. Fibiger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans C. Fibiger is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their academic profile indicates an engagement in research activities connected to this institution.

While there are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues listed, the scientist's academic presence is established through their association with a major research university.

There are no specific details on main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work provided, nor information about book publications or awards. This limits the available data on the scope and focus areas of their research activities.

Hans C. Fibiger is currently living, and the profile reflects ongoing professional status without indication of cessation of academic activities.

Best Publications

  • Extinction and recovery of cocaine self-administration following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens.

    D.C.S. Roberts;G.F. Koob;P. Klonoff;H.C. Fibiger

  • On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine.

    David C.S. Roberts;Michael E. Corcoran;Hans C. Fibiger

  • The nucleus basalis magnocellularis: the origin of a cholinergic projection to the neocortex of the rat.

    John Lehmann;J.I. Nagy;S. Atmadja;H.C. Fibiger

  • Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward.

    Geoffrey D. Carr;Hans C. Fibiger;Anthony G. Phillips

  • Afferent connections of the laterodorsal and the pedunculopontine tegmental nuclei in the rat: A retro‐ and antero‐grade transport and immunohistochemical study

    Kazue Semba;Hans C. Fibiger

  • Conditioned defensive burying: a new paradigm for the study of anxiolytic agents

    Dallas Treit;J.P.J. Pinel;H.C. Fibiger

  • Sexual behavior increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of male rats: comparison with novelty and locomotion.

    Geert Damsma;James G. Pfaus;Danielle Wenkstern;Anthony G. Phillips

  • Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat.

    J. G. Pfaus;Geert Damsma;George G. Nomikos;D. G. Wenkstern

  • Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning

    Christina Spyraki;Hans C. Fibiger;Anthony G. Phillips

  • Conditioned and unconditioned stimuli increase frontal cortical and hippocampal acetylcholine release: effects of novelty, habituation, and fear.

    Elio Acquas;Catriona Wilson;Hans C. Fibiger

  • Evidence that mesolimbic dopaminergic activation underlies the locomotor stimulant action of nicotine in rats.

    P. B. S. Clarke;D. S. Fu;A. Jakubovic;H. C. Fibiger

  • Feeding and drinking deficits after 6-hydroxydopamine administration in the rat: similarities to the lateral hypothalamic syndrome.

    H.C. Fibiger;A.P. Zis;E.G. McGeer

  • On the source of gaba-containing terminals in the substantia nigra. Electron microscopic autoradiographic and biochemical studies

    T. Hattori;P.L. McGeer;H.C. Fibiger;E.G. McGeer

  • Attenuation of heroin reward in rats by disruption of the mesolimbic dopamine system.

    Christina Spyraki;Hans C. Fibiger;Anthony G. Phillips

  • Neostriatal choline acetylase and cholinesterase following selective brain lesions.

    P.L. McGeer;E.G. McGeer;H.C. Fibiger;V. Wickson

  • Evidence for conditional neuronal activation following exposure to a cocaine-paired environment: role of forebrain limbic structures

    Erin E. Brown;George S. Robertson;Hans C. Fibiger

  • Reward, Motivation, Cognition: Psychobiology of Mesotelencephalic Dopamine Systems

    H. C. Fibiger;A. G. Phillips

  • Cortical Regulation of Subcortical Dopamine Release: Mediation via the Ventral Tegmental Area

    Matthew T. Taber;Sheela Das;Hans C. Fibiger

  • Sexual activity increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of female rats

    J.G. Pfaus;G. Damsma;D. Wenkstern;H.C. Fibiger

  • Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward.

    H. C. Fibiger;D. A. Carter;A. G. Phillips

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony G. Phillips
Anthony G. Phillips University of British Columbia
David C.S. Roberts
David C.S. Roberts Wake Forest University
Paul R. Sanberg
Paul R. Sanberg University of South Florida
Steven R. Vincent
Steven R. Vincent University of British Columbia
James I. Nagy
James I. Nagy University of Manitoba
Edith G. McGeer
Edith G. McGeer University of British Columbia
George G. Nomikos
George G. Nomikos Takeda (Japan)
Byron A. Campbell
Byron A. Campbell Princeton University
Henry I. Yamamura
Henry I. Yamamura University of Arizona
Richard J. Beninger
Richard J. Beninger Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medicine but exploring alternative fields or flexible study options? The online landscape now offers diverse medical and healthcare careers for all backgrounds. If you want to work with healthcare data, consider accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid that can get you job-ready in a short time.

For those aiming to become a nurse without the stress of entrance exams, there are quality lpn program without teas test requirements, making nursing more accessible. If you’re drawn to leadership and operations, an online healthcare administration degree can open doors to management positions across hospitals and clinics.

Nurses holding an ADN who want to advance further can bridge into advanced practice via adn to fnp bridge programs. These online pathways are ideal for working professionals or career changers eager to make a difference in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Hans C. Fibiger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles