World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5998 5635 3206 2971 707 43276

Paul R. Sanberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul R. Sanberg between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul R. Sanberg published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2006. 7 of the 750 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2006. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 7 publications 1979: 10 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 29 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 26 publications 1998: 23 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 27 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 31 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1976 2025

750 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul R. Sanberg: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 7
1979 10
1980 6
1981 8
1982 3
1983 6
1984 9
1985 2
1986 9
1987 10
1988 12
1989 18
1990 14
1991 16
1992 16
1993 13
1994 10
1995 29
1996 22
1997 26
1998 23
1999 14
2000 27
2001 21
2002 31
2003 22
2004 19
2005 16
2006 36
2007 22
2008 24
2009 23
2010 24
2011 17
2012 27
2013 20
2014 29
2015 18
2016 14
2017 11
2018 13
2019 13
2020 13
2021 8
2022 4
2023 6
2024 5
2025 2
Total 750
Download as CSV

Paul R. Sanberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Sanberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 701–720 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 707 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307 707
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul R. Sanberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Sanberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative conditions
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)
  • 2012 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Paul R. Sanberg is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Physiology.

Their work centers around key topics such as Spinal Cord Injury Research, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with them include Hongyun Huang, Hari Shanker Sharma, Cesar V. Borlongan, Lin Chen, and Mengzhou Xue.

They have published extensively in a range of venues. The most frequent publication outlets include the Journal of Neurorestoratology, Cell Transplantation, Technology & Innovation, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, and The Journals of Gerontology Series A.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Paul R. Sanberg include:

  • Cell-Free Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Human Bone Marrow Endothelial Progenitor Cells as Potential Therapeutics for Microvascular Endothelium Restoration in ALS (2020, NeuroMolecular Medicine)
  • LncRNAs Stand as Potent Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Stroke (2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)
  • The 2022 yearbook of Neurorestoratology (2023, Journal of Neurorestoratology)
  • The Triple Alliance: Microbiome, Mitochondria, and Metabolites in the Context of Age-Related Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer's Disease (2023, The Journals of Gerontology Series A)
  • The 2023 yearbook of Neurorestoratology (2024, Journal of Neurorestoratology)

Throughout their career, they have received several recognitions including becoming a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1993 and the National Academy of Inventors in 2012. They were also named Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2015 and Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2018. In 2021, they were awarded IEEE Fellow for contributions to stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative conditions.

Best Publications

  • Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro.

    J. Sanchez-Ramos;S. Song;F. Cardozo-Pelaez;C. Hazzi

  • Intravenous Administration of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Reduces Behavioral Deficits After Stroke in Rats

    Jieli Chen;Paul R. Sanberg;Yi Li;Lei Wang

  • Neuropathological Evidence of Graft Survival and Striatal Reinnervation after the Transplantation of Fetal Mesencephalic Tissue in a Patient with Parkinson's Disease

    J H Kordower;T B Freeman;B J Snow;F J Vingerhoets

  • Cholinergic modulation of microglial activation via alpha-7 nicotinic receptors

    Douglas Shytle;Jun Tan;Paul R Sanberg

  • Implanterbar, bioforenelig, immunoisolatorisk bærer for avgivelse av valgte terapeutiske produkter, samt fremgangsmÕter ved fremstilling av bærere

    Dionne Keith E;Emerich Dwaine F;Hoffman Diane;Scharp David W

  • Central Nervous System Entry of Peripherally Injected Umbilical Cord Blood Cells Is Not Required for Neuroprotection in Stroke

    Cesar V. Borlongan;Martin Hadman;Cyndy Davis Sanberg;Paul R. Sanberg

  • Infusion of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Rat Model of Stroke Dose-Dependently Rescues Behavioral Deficits and Reduces Infarct Volume

    Martina Vendrame;Jordan Cassady;Jennifer Newcomb;Tanya Butler

  • Bilateral fetal nigral transplantation into the postcommissural putamen in Parkinson's disease

    Thomas B. Freeman;C. Warren Olanow;Robert A. Hauser;G. Michael Nauert

  • The catalepsy test: its ups and downs.

    Paul R. Sanberg;Michael D. Bunsey;Magda Giordano;Andrew B. Norman

  • Intravenous versus intrastriatal cord blood administration in a rodent model of stroke.

    A.E. Willing;J. Lixian;M. Milliken;S. Poulos

  • Intravenous Administration of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Distribution, Migration, and Differentiation

    Svitlana Garbuzova-Davis;Alison E. Willing;Tanja Zigova;Samuel Saporta

  • Transplantation of cryopreserved human embryonal carcinoma-derived neurons (NT2N cells) promotes functional recovery in ischemic rats

    Cesario V. Borlongan;Yasuo Tajima;John Q. Trojanowski;Virginia M.-Y. Lee

  • Expression of neural markers in human umbilical cord blood.

    Juan R. Sanchez-Ramos;Shijie Song;Siddharth G. Kamath;Tanja Zigova

  • Intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood reduces neurological deficit in the rat after traumatic brain injury.

    Dunyue Lu;Paul R. Sanberg;Asim Mahmood;Yi Li

  • Haloperidol-induced catalepsy is mediated by postsynaptic dopamine receptors.

    Paul R. Sanberg

  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as targets for antidepressants.

    R D Shytle;A A Silver;R J Lukas;M B Newman

  • Fetal nigral grafts survive and mediate clinical benefit in a patient with Parkinson's disease

    J H Kordower;T B Freeman;E Y Chen;E J Mufson

  • Transplanted fetal striatum in Huntington's disease: Phenotypic development and lack of pathology

    Thomas B. Freeman;Francesca Cicchetti;Robert A. Hauser;Terrence W. Deacon

  • Elevated body swing test: a new behavioral parameter for rats with 6- hydroxydopamine-induced hemiparkinsonism

    Cesario V. Borlongan;Paul R. Sanberg

  • Analysis of Mecamylamine Stereoisomers on Human Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes

    Papke Rl;Sanberg Pr;Shytle Rd

Frequent Co-Authors

Alison E. Willing
Alison E. Willing University of South Florida
Samuel Saporta
Samuel Saporta University of South Florida
Cesar V. Borlongan
Cesar V. Borlongan University of South Florida
Thomas B. Freeman
Thomas B. Freeman University of South Florida
Paula C. Bickford
Paula C. Bickford University of South Florida
Naoki Tajiri
Naoki Tajiri Nagoya City University
Juan Sanchez-Ramos
Juan Sanchez-Ramos University of South Florida
Dwaine F. Emerich
Dwaine F. Emerich Alkermes (Ireland)
Robert A. Hauser
Robert A. Hauser University of South Florida
Patrick Aebischer
Patrick Aebischer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways can help you jumpstart or advance your healthcare career more flexibly. Many students look for ways to reduce clinical hours or speed up graduation while still meeting industry standards. For practicing nurses, some rn to bsn programs without clinicals provide an opportunity to earn a bachelor’s degree online without traditional on-site clinical requirements.

Aspiring nurse leaders can also consider executive nursing programs that focus on efficiency and affordability. The shortest post master's dnp program is designed for master's-prepared nurses who want to earn a doctorate quickly, often with accelerated or condensed coursework. For budget-conscious students, the cheapest dnp program options can be an especially attractive way to gain credentials without accumulating significant debt.

If you’re just starting out, the fastest lpn program options offer efficient entry into practical nursing careers, allowing you to complete required studies online and join the workforce sooner. These alternative online pathways make healthcare education more accessible—whether you’re seeking advanced practice, leadership roles, or just starting your journey.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Sanberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles