World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
43276
World Ranking
5999
National Ranking
3207

Paul R. Sanberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Sanberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 707 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul R. Sanberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul R. Sanberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative conditions
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)
  • 2012 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Paul R. Sanberg is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Physiology.

Their work centers around key topics such as Spinal Cord Injury Research, Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with them include Hongyun Huang, Hari Shanker Sharma, Cesar V. Borlongan, Lin Chen, and Mengzhou Xue.

They have published extensively in a range of venues. The most frequent publication outlets include the Journal of Neurorestoratology, Cell Transplantation, Technology & Innovation, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, and The Journals of Gerontology Series A.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Paul R. Sanberg include:

  • Cell-Free Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Human Bone Marrow Endothelial Progenitor Cells as Potential Therapeutics for Microvascular Endothelium Restoration in ALS (2020, NeuroMolecular Medicine)
  • LncRNAs Stand as Potent Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Stroke (2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)
  • The 2022 yearbook of Neurorestoratology (2023, Journal of Neurorestoratology)
  • The Triple Alliance: Microbiome, Mitochondria, and Metabolites in the Context of Age-Related Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer's Disease (2023, The Journals of Gerontology Series A)
  • The 2023 yearbook of Neurorestoratology (2024, Journal of Neurorestoratology)

Throughout their career, they have received several recognitions including becoming a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1993 and the National Academy of Inventors in 2012. They were also named Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2015 and Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2018. In 2021, they were awarded IEEE Fellow for contributions to stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative conditions.

Best Publications

  • Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro.

    J. Sanchez-Ramos;S. Song;F. Cardozo-Pelaez;C. Hazzi

  • Intravenous Administration of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Reduces Behavioral Deficits After Stroke in Rats

    Jieli Chen;Paul R. Sanberg;Yi Li;Lei Wang

  • Neuropathological Evidence of Graft Survival and Striatal Reinnervation after the Transplantation of Fetal Mesencephalic Tissue in a Patient with Parkinson's Disease

    J H Kordower;T B Freeman;B J Snow;F J Vingerhoets

  • Cholinergic modulation of microglial activation via alpha-7 nicotinic receptors

    Douglas Shytle;Jun Tan;Paul R Sanberg

  • Implanterbar, bioforenelig, immunoisolatorisk bærer for avgivelse av valgte terapeutiske produkter, samt fremgangsmÕter ved fremstilling av bærere

    Dionne Keith E;Emerich Dwaine F;Hoffman Diane;Scharp David W

  • Central Nervous System Entry of Peripherally Injected Umbilical Cord Blood Cells Is Not Required for Neuroprotection in Stroke

    Cesar V. Borlongan;Martin Hadman;Cyndy Davis Sanberg;Paul R. Sanberg

  • Infusion of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Rat Model of Stroke Dose-Dependently Rescues Behavioral Deficits and Reduces Infarct Volume

    Martina Vendrame;Jordan Cassady;Jennifer Newcomb;Tanya Butler

  • Bilateral fetal nigral transplantation into the postcommissural putamen in Parkinson's disease

    Thomas B. Freeman;C. Warren Olanow;Robert A. Hauser;G. Michael Nauert

  • The catalepsy test: its ups and downs.

    Paul R. Sanberg;Michael D. Bunsey;Magda Giordano;Andrew B. Norman

  • Intravenous versus intrastriatal cord blood administration in a rodent model of stroke.

    A.E. Willing;J. Lixian;M. Milliken;S. Poulos

  • Intravenous Administration of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Distribution, Migration, and Differentiation

    Svitlana Garbuzova-Davis;Alison E. Willing;Tanja Zigova;Samuel Saporta

  • Transplantation of cryopreserved human embryonal carcinoma-derived neurons (NT2N cells) promotes functional recovery in ischemic rats

    Cesario V. Borlongan;Yasuo Tajima;John Q. Trojanowski;Virginia M.-Y. Lee

  • Expression of neural markers in human umbilical cord blood.

    Juan R. Sanchez-Ramos;Shijie Song;Siddharth G. Kamath;Tanja Zigova

  • Intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood reduces neurological deficit in the rat after traumatic brain injury.

    Dunyue Lu;Paul R. Sanberg;Asim Mahmood;Yi Li

  • Haloperidol-induced catalepsy is mediated by postsynaptic dopamine receptors.

    Paul R. Sanberg

  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as targets for antidepressants.

    R D Shytle;A A Silver;R J Lukas;M B Newman

  • Fetal nigral grafts survive and mediate clinical benefit in a patient with Parkinson's disease

    J H Kordower;T B Freeman;E Y Chen;E J Mufson

  • Transplanted fetal striatum in Huntington's disease: Phenotypic development and lack of pathology

    Thomas B. Freeman;Francesca Cicchetti;Robert A. Hauser;Terrence W. Deacon

  • Elevated body swing test: a new behavioral parameter for rats with 6- hydroxydopamine-induced hemiparkinsonism

    Cesario V. Borlongan;Paul R. Sanberg

  • Analysis of Mecamylamine Stereoisomers on Human Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes

    Papke Rl;Sanberg Pr;Shytle Rd

Frequent Co-Authors

Alison E. Willing
Alison E. Willing University of South Florida
Samuel Saporta
Samuel Saporta University of South Florida
Cesar V. Borlongan
Cesar V. Borlongan University of South Florida
Thomas B. Freeman
Thomas B. Freeman University of South Florida
Paula C. Bickford
Paula C. Bickford University of South Florida
Naoki Tajiri
Naoki Tajiri Nagoya City University
Juan Sanchez-Ramos
Juan Sanchez-Ramos University of South Florida
Dwaine F. Emerich
Dwaine F. Emerich Alkermes (Ireland)
Robert A. Hauser
Robert A. Hauser University of South Florida
Patrick Aebischer
Patrick Aebischer École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online pathways can help you jumpstart or advance your healthcare career more flexibly. Many students look for ways to reduce clinical hours or speed up graduation while still meeting industry standards. For practicing nurses, some rn to bsn programs without clinicals provide an opportunity to earn a bachelor’s degree online without traditional on-site clinical requirements.

Aspiring nurse leaders can also consider executive nursing programs that focus on efficiency and affordability. The shortest post master's dnp program is designed for master's-prepared nurses who want to earn a doctorate quickly, often with accelerated or condensed coursework. For budget-conscious students, the cheapest dnp program options can be an especially attractive way to gain credentials without accumulating significant debt.

If you’re just starting out, the fastest lpn program options offer efficient entry into practical nursing careers, allowing you to complete required studies online and join the workforce sooner. These alternative online pathways make healthcare education more accessible—whether you’re seeking advanced practice, leadership roles, or just starting your journey.

Best Scientists Citing Paul R. Sanberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles