| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 68 | 2794 | 2555 | 10 | 10 | 239 | 13533 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Dwaine F. Emerich between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dwaine F. Emerich published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2000. 1 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.
250 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 4 |
| 1990 | 6 |
| 1991 | 6 |
| 1992 | 9 |
| 1993 | 8 |
| 1994 | 13 |
| 1995 | 9 |
| 1996 | 12 |
| 1997 | 14 |
| 1998 | 10 |
| 1999 | 10 |
| 2000 | 17 |
| 2001 | 9 |
| 2002 | 9 |
| 2003 | 11 |
| 2004 | 15 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2006 | 11 |
| 2007 | 14 |
| 2008 | 5 |
| 2009 | 7 |
| 2010 | 7 |
| 2011 | 7 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2013 | 2 |
| 2014 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4 |
| 2018 | 3 |
| 2019 | 5 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 250 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dwaine F. Emerich sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 239 publications — 72nd percentile
72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | 239 |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dwaine F. Emerich sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile
72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | 68 |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
Gorka Orive;Eduardo Anitua;José Luis Pedraz;Dwaine F. Emerich
Dwaine F. Emerich;Christopher G. Thanos
Dwaine F. Emerich;Shelley R. Winn;Philippe M. Hantraye;Marc Peschanski
Jeffrey H. Kordower;Shelley R. Winn;Yue-Ting Liu;Elliott J. Mufson
Dwaine F. Emerich;Shelley R. Winn;James Harper;Joseph P. Hammang
Raymond T. Bartus;Dwaine F. Emerich
Dwaine F. Emerich;Mark D. Lindner;Shelley R. Winn;Er-Yun Chen
Dwaine F. Emerich;Stephen J.M. Skinner;Cesario V. Borlongan;Alfred V. Vasconcellos
Dwaine F. Emerich;Reginald L. Dean;Raymond T. Bartus
Shelley R. Winn;Joseph P. Hammang;Dwaine F. Emerich;Alice Lee
Dwaine F. Emerich;Shelley R. Winn;Lisa Christenson;Meg A. Palmatier
Mark D. Lindner;Shelley R. Winn;E. E. Baetge;Joseph P. Hammang
Cesar V. Borlongan;Steve J.M. Skinner;Marilyn Geaney;Alfred V. Vasconcellos
Dwaine F. Emerich;Reginald L. Dean;Chester Osborn;Raymond T. Bartus
Mark D. Lindner;Melissa A. Plone;Chris K. Cain;Beata Frydel
Jeffrey H. Kordower;Er‐Yun Chen;Christian Winkler;Rose Fricker
Dwaine F. Emerich;Joseph P. Hammang;E.Edward Baetge;Shelley R. Winn
Dwaine F. Emerich;Mark A. Tracy;Kevin L. Ward;Maria Figueiredo
Dwaine F. Emerich;Eduardo Silva;Omar Ali;David Mooney
Mark D Lindner;Chris K Cain;Melissa A Plone;Beata R Frydel
Dwaine F. Emerich;Christopher G. Thanos;Moses Goddard;Stephen J.M. Skinner
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring neuroscience opens doors to varied and rewarding career options. For students considering whether to pursue neuroscience or related fields online, it’s important to weigh factors like cost, flexibility, and future earning potential. Many who are interested in science and healthcare may also want to explore fun majors in college that pay well for maximum financial benefit and personal fulfillment.
Affordable education matters, especially for online learners seeking value. Investigate the cheapest online college options that accept FAFSA, which can help you minimize student debt and maximize financial aid opportunities.
Beyond degrees, short-term online certification programs can help you quickly boost your credentials and income potential, whether you’re just starting or looking to specialize further.
Students who prioritize simplicity or are balancing work and study may be interested in the easy university majors that offer flexible online pathways toward a degree. No matter your goals, options exist to make neuroscience or a related career both accessible and rewarding.
Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology
Natural History Museum
University of Melbourne
Örebro University
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
University of Calgary
Nagoya University
University of Geneva
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
MIT
Goethe University Frankfurt
Syracuse University
Stockholm University
University of Liverpool
Ruhr University Bochum
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine