World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
E. Eric Adams

E. Eric Adams

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
6565
World Ranking
8823
National Ranking
3164

E. Eric Adams publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Eric Adams sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

E. Eric Adams D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Eric Adams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

E. Eric Adams is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their research primarily covers areas in Environmental Science, Engineering, and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Earth-Surface Processes, Pollution, Ocean Engineering, Oceanography, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work spans several key topics, including Coastal and Marine Dynamics, Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation, Wind and Air Flow Studies, Geological Formations and Processes, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Fluid Dynamics and Mixing.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Extent of impact of deep-sea nodule mining midwater plumes is influenced by sediment loading, turbulence and thresholds, 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • An evaluation of models that estimate droplet size from subsurface oil releases, 2021, Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Unconfined Dense Plunging Jets Used for Brine Disposal from Desalination Plants, 2020, Processes
  • Spreading and Deposition of Turbidity Currents: Application to Open-Water Sediment Disposal, 2020, Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering
  • Effect of crossflow on trapping depths of particle plumes: laboratory experiments and application to the PLUMEX field experiment, 2021, Environmental Fluid Mechanics

Frequent collaborators in their research include Carlos Munoz Royo, Thomas Peacock, Matthew H. Alford, Dayang Wang, and Ishita Shrivastava.

The research output has appeared in diverse publication venues such as Communications Earth & Environment, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Processes, Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering, and Environmental Fluid Mechanics.

Best Publications

  • Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 2. Spatial moments analysis

    E. Eric Adams;Lynn W. Gelhar

  • Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 3. Geostatistical analysis of hydraulic conductivity

    Kenneth R. Rehfeldt;J. Mark Boggs;Lynn W. Gelhar

  • Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 1. Overview and site description

    J. Mark Boggs;Steven C. Young;Lisa M. Beard;Lynn W. Gelhar

  • Formation dynamics of subsurface hydrocarbon intrusions following the Deepwater Horizon blowout

    Scott A. Socolofsky;E. Eric Adams;Christopher R. Sherwood

  • Multi-phase plumes in uniform and stratified crossflow

    S. A. Socolofsky;E. E. Adams

  • A Random-walk, Particle Tracking Model for Well-mixed Estuaries and Coastal Waters

    K.Nadia Dimou;E.Eric Adams

  • Modeling the release of CO2 in the deep ocean

    Christopher R. Liro;E. Eric Adams;Howard J. Herzog

  • CO2 hydrate composite for ocean carbon sequestration.

    Sangyong Lee;Liyuan Liang;David Riestenberg;Olivia R West

  • Field study of dispersion in a heterogeneous aquifer: 4. Investigation of adsorption and sampling bias

    J. Mark Boggs;E. Eric Adams

  • Evolution of droplets in subsea oil and gas blowouts: development and validation of the numerical model VDROP-J.

    Lin Zhao;Michel C. Boufadel;Scott A. Socolofsky;Eric Adams

  • A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF BASIC TECHNIQUES FOR PREDICTING THE BEHAVIOR OF SURFACE OIL SLICKS

    Keith D. Stolzenbach;Ole Secher Madsen;E. Eric Adams;Andrew M. Pollack

  • Ocean Storage of CO2

    E. Eric Adams;Ken Caldeira

  • Effect of Salinity and Ionic Composition on Evaporation: Analysis of Dead Sea Evaporation Pans

    Atul M. Salhotra;E. Eric Adams;Donald R. F. Harleman

  • Role of Slip Velocity in the Behavior of Stratified Multiphase Plumes

    Scott A. Socolofsky;Scott A. Socolofsky;E. Eric Adams;E. Eric Adams

  • A Tale of Two Spills: Novel Science and Policy Implications of an Emerging New Oil Spill Model

    Charles H. Peterson;Sean S. Anderson;Gary N. Cherr;Richard F. Ambrose

  • Simulating Oil Droplet Dispersal From the Deepwater Horizon Spill With a Lagrangian Approach

    Elizabeth W. E. W. North;E. Eric E. E. Adams;Zachary Z. Schlag;Christopher R. C. R. Sherwood

  • Impacts of ocean CO 2 disposal on marine life: I. A toxicological assessment integrating constant‐concentration laboratory assay data with variable‐concentration field exposure

    David I. Auerbach;Jennifer A. Caulfield;E. Eric Adams;Howard J. Herzog

  • Intercomparison of oil spill prediction models for accidental blowout scenarios with and without subsea chemical dispersant injection.

    Scott A. Socolofsky;E. Eric Adams;Michel C. Boufadel;Zachary M. Aman

  • Evaporation from heated water bodies: Predicting combined forced plus free convection

    E. Eric Adams;Douglas J. Cosler;Karl R. Helfrich

  • Buoyant Surface Jets

    Gerhard H. Jirka;Keith D. Stolzenbach;E. Eric Adams

  • Extent of impact of deep-sea nodule mining midwater plumes is influenced by sediment loading, turbulence and thresholds

    Carlos Muñoz-Royo;Thomas Peacock;Matthew H. Alford;Jerome A. Smith

  • A Tale of Two Spills: Novel Science and Policy Implications of an Emerging New Oil Spill Model

    E. Eric Adams;Charles H. Peterson;Sean S. Anderson;Gary N. Cherr

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Wing-Keung Law
Adrian Wing-Keung Law National University of Singapore
Michel C. Boufadel
Michel C. Boufadel New Jersey Institute of Technology
Dayang Wang
Dayang Wang Jilin University
Costas Tsouris
Costas Tsouris Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Ruoying He
Ruoying He North Carolina State University
Ken Caldeira
Ken Caldeira Carnegie Institution for Science
Kenneth Lee
Kenneth Lee Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Edward T. Peltzer
Edward T. Peltzer Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Programs like best gis programs are crucial for mastering spatial data analysis, a skill highly valued in environmental management and urban planning.

Those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy or public administration may consider the easiest online mpa programs. These accelerate skill development in public affairs, allowing professionals to impact sustainable development initiatives swiftly.

Understanding societal factors is also important, and an online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into human behavior and social dynamics, key components when addressing environmental challenges.

For those pursuing advanced expertise, flexible options like a doctorate degree online no dissertation offer a practical path. These programs emphasize applied research and leadership without the traditional dissertation requirement, fitting busy professionals aiming to elevate their impact.

Best Scientists Citing E. Eric Adams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles