World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14410
World Ranking
4301
National Ranking
1946

Alison E. Willing publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison E. Willing sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alison E. Willing D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison E. Willing sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alison E. Willing is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States and has contributed significantly to medical research, particularly within neurology and related subfields. Their work spans topics such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) research, mesenchymal stem cell research, spinal cord injury, extracellular vesicles, bone and joint diseases, traumatic brain injury, neurovascular disturbances, and trauma and emergency care studies.

Their recent publications include:

  • Potential of mesenchymal stem cells alone, or in combination, to treat traumatic brain injury (2020), CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
  • Cell-Free Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Human Bone Marrow Endothelial Progenitor Cells as Potential Therapeutics for Microvascular Endothelium Restoration in ALS (2020), NeuroMolecular Medicine
  • Treatment with shCCL20-CCR6 nanodendriplexes and human mesenchymal stem cell therapy improves pathology in mice with repeated traumatic brain injury (2020), Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine
  • Fighting the War Against COVID-19 via Cell-Based Regenerative Medicine: Lessons Learned from 1918 Spanish Flu and Other Previous Pandemics (2020), Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
  • Apolipoprotein A1 Enhances Endothelial Cell Survival in an In Vitro Model of ALS (2022), eNeuro

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Svitlana Garbuzova-Davis
  • Cesar V. Borlongan
  • Paul R. Sanberg
  • Mahasweta Das
  • Shyam S. Mohapatra

Most publications have appeared in the following venues:

  • NeuroMolecular Medicine
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
  • Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine
  • Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
  • eNeuro

The primary field Alison E. Willing has contributed to is Medicine, with 15 publications. The main subfields of their research are:

  • Neurology
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Their research topics cover:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Bone and Joint Diseases
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

Best Publications

  • Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro.

    J. Sanchez-Ramos;S. Song;F. Cardozo-Pelaez;C. Hazzi

  • Intravenous Administration of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Reduces Behavioral Deficits After Stroke in Rats

    Jieli Chen;Paul R. Sanberg;Yi Li;Lei Wang

  • Infusion of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Rat Model of Stroke Dose-Dependently Rescues Behavioral Deficits and Reduces Infarct Volume

    Martina Vendrame;Jordan Cassady;Jennifer Newcomb;Tanya Butler

  • Intravenous versus intrastriatal cord blood administration in a rodent model of stroke.

    A.E. Willing;J. Lixian;M. Milliken;S. Poulos

  • Intravenous Administration of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells in a Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Distribution, Migration, and Differentiation

    Svitlana Garbuzova-Davis;Alison E. Willing;Tanja Zigova;Samuel Saporta

  • Expression of neural markers in human umbilical cord blood.

    Juan R. Sanchez-Ramos;Shijie Song;Siddharth G. Kamath;Tanja Zigova

  • The Spleen Contributes to Stroke-Induced Neurodegeneration

    Craig T. Ajmo;Dionne O. L. Vernon;Lisa Collier;Aaron A. Hall

  • Anti-inflammatory effects of human cord blood cells in a rat model of stroke.

    Martina Vendrame;Carmelina Gemma;Dirson De Mesquita;Lisa Collier

  • Human umbilical cord blood stem cells infusion in spinal cord injury: engraftment and beneficial influence on behavior.

    Samuel Saporta;Jong Joong Kim;Jong Joong Kim;Alison E. Willing;Eugene S. Fu

  • Cord blood rescues stroke-induced changes in splenocyte phenotype and function

    Martina Vendrame;Carmelina Gemma;Keith R. Pennypacker;Paula C. Bickford

  • Human umbilical cord blood cells express neural antigens after transplantation into the developing rat brain.

    Tanja Zigova;Shijie Song;Alison E Willing;Jennifer E Hudson

  • Neurodegeneration in the rat hippocampus and striatum after middle cerebral artery occlusion.

    Tanya L. Butler;Cheryl A. Kassed;Paul R. Sanberg;Alison E. Willing

  • Timing of Cord Blood Treatment after Experimental Stroke Determines Therapeutic Efficacy

    Jennifer D. Newcomb;Craig T. Ajmo;Cyndy D. Sanberg;Paul R. Sanberg

  • A Transient Decrease in Spleen Size Following Stroke Corresponds to Splenocyte Release into Systemic Circulation

    Hilary A. Seifert;Aaron A. Hall;Cortney B. Chapman;Lisa A. Collier

  • Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Stem Cells and Brain Repair

    Paul R. Sanberg;Alison E. Willing;Svitlana Garbuzova-Davis;Samuel Saporta

  • Mobilized peripheral blood cells administered intravenously produce functional recovery in stroke.

    Alison E. Willing;Martina Vendrame;Jennifer Mallery;C. Jordan Cassady

  • Blockade of adrenoreceptors inhibits the splenic response to stroke.

    Craig T. Ajmo;Lisa A. Collier;Christopher C. Leonardo;Aaron A. Hall

  • Gastric distension-induced c-fos expression in catecholaminergic neurons of rat dorsal vagal complex.

    A. E. Willing;H. R. Berthoud

  • Cytokines produced by cultured human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) cells: implications for brain repair.

    Mary B. Newman;Alison E. Willing;John J. Manresa;Cyndy Davis Sanberg

  • Capsaicin-resistant vagal afferent fibers in the rat gastrointestinal tract: anatomical identification and functional integrity

    Hans-Rudolf Berthoud;Laurel M Patterson;Alison E Willing;Karin Mueller

  • Human umbilical cord blood progenitors: the potential of these hematopoietic cells to become neural.

    Ning Chen;Jennifer E. Hudson;Piotr Walczak;Iwona Misiuta

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Sanberg
Paul R. Sanberg University of South Florida
Samuel Saporta
Samuel Saporta University of South Florida
Paula C. Bickford
Paula C. Bickford University of South Florida
Juan Sanchez-Ramos
Juan Sanchez-Ramos University of South Florida
Thomas B. Freeman
Thomas B. Freeman University of South Florida
Cesar V. Borlongan
Cesar V. Borlongan University of South Florida
Shyam S. Mohapatra
Shyam S. Mohapatra University of South Florida
Michael Chopp
Michael Chopp Oakland University
Hans-Rudolf Berthoud
Hans-Rudolf Berthoud Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Adam D. Bachstetter
Adam D. Bachstetter University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often intersects with closely related study and career options available through online programs. For students interested in the broader behavioral sciences, pursuing online msw programs affordable can offer a pathway into social work, preparing graduates to work in settings like hospitals, schools, or mental health clinics. These affordable programs are designed to be flexible and budget-friendly.

Those fascinated by behavioral analysis can investigate bcba programs, leading to certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst—a role in high demand within schools and clinical environments. Many of these programs are available online and focus on practical training.

If career advancement is a priority, students may want to consider accelerated online msw programs that allow for faster completion times. These options are ideal for professionals aiming to quickly upscale their qualifications.

Finally, those seeking a broader foundation in the mind and behavior may choose an online accelerated psychology degree. This pathway provides a flexible, fast-track introduction to key concepts in psychology and neuroscience, opening doors to a wide spectrum of careers in healthcare, research, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Alison E. Willing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles