World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
20422
World Ranking
1701
National Ranking
827

Sean I Savitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean I Savitz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 568 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sean I Savitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sean I Savitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sean I Savitz is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with specific contributions in subfields such as epidemiology, neurology, rehabilitation, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research

Their work has been published extensively in several key venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Stroke
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

Some recent papers by Sean I Savitz reflect ongoing topics of interest in stroke research and treatment:

  • Pharmacological brain cytoprotection in acute ischaemic stroke - renewed hope in the reperfusion era, 2022, Nature Reviews Neurology
  • Top Priorities for Cerebroprotective Studies-A Paradigm Shift: Report From STAIR XI, 2021, Stroke
  • Cerebrovascular Disease in Patients with COVID-19: A Review of the Literature and Case Series, 2020, Case Reports in Neurology
  • Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Strokes, 2020, Stroke
  • Recent Advances in Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research include:

  • Anjail Sharrief
  • Jaroslaw Aronowski
  • Sujan Reddy
  • James C. Grotta
  • Jennifer E. S. Beauchamp

Best Publications

  • Update of the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable Preclinical Recommendations

    Marc Fisher;Marc Fisher;Giora Z. Feuerstein;David W. Howells;Patricia D. Hurn

  • Functional assessments in the rodent stroke model

    Krystal L Schaar;Miranda M Brenneman;Sean I Savitz

  • Erythropoietin administration protects retinal neurons from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury

    Anna K. Junk;Antonios Mammis;Sean I. Savitz;Manjeet Singh

  • Early release of HMGB-1 from neurons after the onset of brain ischemia

    Jianhua Qiu;Masaki Nishimura;Yumei Wang;John R Sims

  • Diagnosis and initial management of cerebellar infarction

    Jonathan A Edlow;David E Newman-Toker;Sean I Savitz

  • Safety and efficacy of multipotent adult progenitor cells in acute ischaemic stroke (MASTERS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

    David C Hess;Lawrence R Wechsler;Wayne M Clark;Sean I Savitz

  • Genetic and hormonal factors modulate spreading depression and transient hemiparesis in mouse models of familial hemiplegic migraine type 1

    Katharina Eikermann-Haerter;Ergin Dileköz;Chiho Kudo;Sean I. Savitz

  • Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic stroke

    Sean I. Savitz;Vivek Misra;Mallik Kasam;Harrinder Juneja

  • Future of neuroprotection for acute stroke: in the aftermath of the SAINT trials.

    Sean I. Savitz;Sean I. Savitz;Marc Fisher;Marc Fisher

  • Safety of tPA in stroke mimics and neuroimaging-negative cerebral ischemia.

    O. Y. Chernyshev;S. Martin-Schild;K. C. Albright;Andrew D Barreto

  • Stem Cell Therapy as an Emerging Paradigm for Stroke (STEPS) II

    Sean I. Savitz;Michael Chopp;Robert Deans;S. T. Carmichael

  • Necrostatin-1 reduces histopathology and improves functional outcome after controlled cortical impact in mice

    Zerong You;Sean I Savitz;Sean I Savitz;Jinsheng Yang;Alexei Degterev

  • Necroptosis, a novel form of caspase-independent cell death, contributes to neuronal damage in a retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury model.

    Daniel M. Rosenbaum;Alexei Degterev;Joel David;Pearl S. Rosenbaum

  • Neurotransplantation of Fetal Porcine Cells in Patients with Basal Ganglia Infarcts: A Preliminary Safety and Feasibility Study

    Sean I. Savitz;Jonathan Dinsmore;Julian Wu;Galen V. Henderson

  • Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells enhance recovery after acute ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged rats

    Miranda Brenneman;Sushil Sharma;Matthew Harting;Roger Strong

  • Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebellar infarction.

    Sean I. Savitz;Louis R. Caplan;Jonathan A. Edlow

  • Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Occlusion of the Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Segment

    Amrou Sarraj;Navdeep Sangha;Muhammad Shazam Hussain;Dolora Wisco

  • Pharmacological brain cytoprotection in acute ischaemic stroke — renewed hope in the reperfusion era

    Unknown

  • Moving Rehabilitation Research Forward: Developing Consensus Statements for Rehabilitation and Recovery Research*:

    Julie Bernhardt;Karen Borschmann;Lara Boyd;S. Thomas Carmichael

  • Cell transplantation for stroke

    Sean I. Savitz;Daniel M. Rosenbaum;Jonathan H. Dinsmore;Lawrence R. Wechsler

  • IL-10 directly protects cortical neurons by activating PI-3 kinase and STAT-3 pathways

    Sushil Sharma;Bing Yang;XiaoPei Xi;James C. Grotta

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Grotta
James C. Grotta The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Louise D. McCullough
Louise D. McCullough The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Charles C. Miller
Charles C. Miller The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Gregory W. Albers
Gregory W. Albers Stanford University
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Louis R. Caplan
Louis R. Caplan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Marc Fisher
Marc Fisher Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Adrian P. Gee
Adrian P. Gee Baylor College of Medicine
Steven Warach
Steven Warach The University of Texas at Austin
Gary Cutter
Gary Cutter University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, exploring related degree options and flexible study formats can open more opportunities. Many students are now turning to accelerated programs online to fast-track their education. These programs allow you to earn your degree sooner, saving both time and tuition without compromising quality.

Choosing the right major is crucial, especially if earning potential is a priority. For those asking, "what bachelors degree should I get?"—fields closely related to neuroscience, such as biomedical engineering or cognitive science, often lead to lucrative careers. You can also explore other interesting majors that pay well if you’re open to interdisciplinary paths.

Financing your studies is another key consideration. If affordability matters, look for cheap online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions offer accredited programs, financial aid options, and lower tuition rates, making advanced education in neuroscience and related fields more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Sean I Savitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles