World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9627
World Ranking
7490
National Ranking
3259

Bugra Gedik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bugra Gedik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bugra Gedik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bugra Gedik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bugra Gedik is affiliated with Royal Caribbean Cruises in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research addresses topics such as Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning, Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques. They have also contributed to studies on Air Traffic Management and Optimization, Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, and Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis.

Bugra Gedik has published in several venues, with frequent appearances in arXiv (Cornell University), the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), and the IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

  • Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Forecasting Flight Delays Using Clustered Models Based on Airport Networks, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SLIM: Scalable Linkage of Mobility Data, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Co-authors who frequently collaborate with Bugra Gedik include Mannat Singh, Laura Gustafson, Aaron Adcock, Raj Prateek Kosaraju, and Dhruv Mahajan.

Best Publications

  • Protecting Location Privacy with Personalized k-Anonymity: Architecture and Algorithms

    B. Gedik;Ling Liu

  • Location Privacy in Mobile Systems: A Personalized Anonymization Model

    B. Gedik;Ling Liu

  • SPADE: the system s declarative stream processing engine

    Bugra Gedik;Henrique Andrade;Kun-Lung Wu;Philip S. Yu

  • A catalog of stream processing optimizations

    Martin Hirzel;Robert Soulé;Scott Schneider;Buğra Gedik

  • Elastic Scaling for Data Stream Processing

    Bugra Gedik;Scott Schneider;Martin Hirzel;Kun-Lung Wu

  • ASAP: An Adaptive Sampling Approach to Data Collection in Sensor Networks

    B. Gedik;Ling Liu;P.S. Yu

  • A Customizable k-Anonymity Model for Protecting Location Privacy

    Bugra Gedik;Ling Liu

  • MobiEyes: Distributed Processing of Continuously Moving Queries on Moving Objects in a Mobile System

    Buğra Gedik;Ling Liu

  • Streaming algorithms for k-core decomposition

    Ahmet Erdem Saríyüce;Buğra Gedik;Gabriela Jacques-Silva;Kun-Lung Wu

  • A distributed approach to node clustering in decentralized peer-to-peer networks

    Lakshmish Ramaswamy;B. Gedik;L. Liu

  • Elastic scaling of data parallel operators in stream processing

    Scott Schneider;Henrique Andrade;Bugra Gedik;Alain Biem

  • MobiEyes: A Distributed Location Monitoring Service Using Moving Location Queries

    B. Gedik;Ling Liu

  • PINCO: a pipelined in-network compression scheme for data collection in wireless sensor networks

    T. Arici;B. Gedik;Y. Altunbasak;L. Liu

  • Fundamentals of Stream Processing: Application Design, Systems, and Analytics

    Henrique C. M. Andrade;Bugra Gedik;Deepak S. Turaga

  • IBM streams processing language: analyzing big data in motion

    M. Hirzel;H. Andrade;B. Gedik;G. Jacques-Silva

  • Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models

    Unknown

  • Partitioning functions for stateful data parallelism in stream processing

    Buğra Gedik

  • Failure recovery for stream processing applications

    Henrique Andrade;Bugra Gedik;Gabriela Jacques Da Silva;Kun-Lung Wu

  • COLA: optimizing stream processing applications via graph partitioning

    Rohit Khandekar;Kirsten Hildrum;Sujay Parekh;Deepak Rajan

  • Method for generating a distributed stream processing application

    Henrique Andrade;Bugra Gedik;Kun-Lung Wu

  • PeerCQ: a decentralized and self-configuring peer-to-peer information monitoring system

    B. Gedik;Ling Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Kun-Lung Wu
Kun-Lung Wu IBM (United States)
Ling Liu
Ling Liu Georgia Institute of Technology
Philip S. Yu
Philip S. Yu University of Illinois at Chicago
Ümit V. Çatalyürek
Ümit V. Çatalyürek Georgia Institute of Technology
Rajesh Bordawekar
Rajesh Bordawekar IBM (United States)
Joel L. Wolf
Joel L. Wolf IBM (United States)
Ravishankar K. Iyer
Ravishankar K. Iyer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mudhakar Srivatsa
Mudhakar Srivatsa IBM (United States)
Zbigniew Kalbarczyk
Zbigniew Kalbarczyk University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yucel Altunbasak
Yucel Altunbasak Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can greatly expand your options for advancing in computer science and related fields. Many students now seek flexibility and affordability, making online programs a practical choice.

For those interested in data analysis, an online master data science program can help you build in-demand skills. If your interests are broader, an online mba cheap can offer management and business training, valuable for tech leadership roles.

Specialized pathways are also available. The best construction management schools offer online programs for those looking to integrate technology with construction and project management. You can also fast-track your education with a 1 year masters for a quicker career boost.

These flexible study options allow you to tailor your education to your specific goals, budget, and time constraints—making it easier to start or advance your career in computer science or related sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Bugra Gedik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles