World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
12446
World Ranking
2804
National Ranking
125

Kurt Rothermel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Rothermel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 412 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kurt Rothermel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Rothermel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Kurt Rothermel is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany and conducts research primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Software.

The scientist has contributed to a variety of main topics in their research, focusing on areas such as Network Time Synchronization Technologies, Advanced Database Systems and Queries, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Data Management and Algorithms, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Software System Performance and Reliability, and Software-Defined Networks and 5G.

Recent scholarly output includes several papers published between 2020 and 2023. These are:

  • "Dynamic QoS-Aware Traffic Planning for Time-Triggered Flows in the Real-Time Data Plane" (2022) in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
  • "Scalable k-out-of-n models for dependability analysis with Bayesian networks" (2021) in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
  • "State-Aware Load Shedding From Input Event Streams in Complex Event Processing" (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Big Data
  • "Controller and Triggering Mechanism Co-design for Control Over Time-Slotted Networks" (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
  • "Availability analysis of redundant and replicated cloud services with Bayesian networks" (2023) in Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Kurt Rothermel frequently publishes in venues that include arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, IEEE Transactions on Big Data, and IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Frank Dürr, Sukanya Bhowmik, Heiko Geppert, Otto Bibartiu, and Beate Ottenwälder, with multiple joint publications indicating ongoing collaboration in various projects.

Best Publications

  • Mole – Concepts of a mobile agent system

    J. Baumann;F. Hohl;K. Rothermel;M. Straßer

  • A classification of location privacy attacks and approaches

    Marius Wernke;Pavel Skvortsov;Frank Dürr;Kurt Rothermel

  • Graph-based mobility model for mobile ad hoc network simulation

    Jing Tian;J. Hahner;C. Becker;I. Stepanov

  • An epidemic model for information diffusion in MANETs

    Abdelmajid Khelil;Christian Becker;Jing Tian;Kurt Rothermel

  • Intelligent agents: an emerging technology for next generation telecommunications?

    T. Magedanz;K. Rothermel;S. Krause

  • PCOM - a component system for pervasive computing

    C. Becker;M. Handte;G. Schiele;K. Rothermel

  • Spatially aware packet routing for mobile ad hoc inter-vehicle radio networks

    Jing Tian;Lu Han;K. Rothermel

  • Next century challenges: Nexus—an open global infrastructure for spatial-aware applications

    Fritz Hohl;Uwe Kubach;Alexander Leonhardi;Kurt Rothermel

  • Dynamic distance maps of the Internet

    W. Theilmann;K. Rothermel

  • Incremental Flow Scheduling and Routing in Time-Sensitive Software-Defined Networks

    Naresh Ganesh Nayak;Frank Durr;Kurt Rothermel

  • BASE - a micro-broker-based middleware for pervasive computing

    C. Becker;G. Schiele;H. Gubbels;K. Rothermel

  • Communication Concepts for Mobile Agent Systems

    Joachim Baumann;Fritz Hohl;Nikolaos Radouniklis;Kurt Rothermel

  • Time-sensitive Software-defined Network (TSSDN) for Real-time Applications

    Naresh Ganesh Nayak;Frank Dürr;Kurt Rothermel

  • Architecture and algorithms for a distributed reputation system

    Michael Kinateder;Kurt Rothermel

  • FlexCup: a flexible and efficient code update mechanism for sensor networks

    Pedro José Marrón;Matthias Gauger;Andreas Lachenmann;Daniel Minder

  • An Adaptive Stream Synchronization Protocol

    Kurt Rothermel;Tobias Helbig

  • TinyCubus: a flexible and adaptive framework sensor networks

    P.J. Marron;A. Lachenmann;D. Minder;J. Hahner

  • NeSTiNg: Simulating IEEE Time-sensitive Networking (TSN) in OMNeT++

    Jonathan Falk;David Hellmanns;Ben Carabelli;Naresh Nayak

  • An adaptive protocol for synchronizing media streams

    Kurt Rothermel;Tobias Helbig

  • MigCEP: operator migration for mobility driven distributed complex event processing

    Beate Ottenwälder;Boris Koldehofe;Kurt Rothermel;Umakishore Ramachandran

Frequent Co-Authors

Umakishore Ramachandran
Umakishore Ramachandran Georgia Institute of Technology
Frank Allgöwer
Frank Allgöwer University of Stuttgart
Ramesh Jain
Ramesh Jain University of California, Irvine
Thomas Ertl
Thomas Ertl University of Stuttgart
Hinrich Schütze
Hinrich Schütze Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Liviu Iftode
Liviu Iftode Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Wolfgang Effelsberg
Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim
Gerd Kortuem
Gerd Kortuem Delft University of Technology
Wolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak University of Stuttgart
Roger Shu Kwan Cheng
Roger Shu Kwan Cheng Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, exploring online degree programs accredited by recognized bodies can be a smart way to balance flexibility with quality education. Accredited programs ensure you gain qualifications that employers value, providing greater credibility and transfer opportunities.

There’s a wide range of specialized career pathways in computer science. For those interested in interactive media, pursuing a game design masters online can open doors in the growing video game industry. Cybersecurity is another high-demand field, and choosing from the leading online cybersecurity degree programs can lead to roles in data protection and digital forensics.

Beyond traditional IT careers, computer science skills are increasingly valuable in related industries. For example, earning a qualification from one of the best online construction management degree providers equips graduates to integrate technology with project management in construction and engineering sectors.

Online degrees allow for self-paced study and can accelerate entry into emerging tech-driven fields. Carefully review the accreditation and curriculum of any program to ensure it aligns with your personal and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Kurt Rothermel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles