What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
Andrea Patocchi focuses on Genetics, Apple scab, Malus, Venturia inaequalis and Malus floribunda.
Her work in Genetics tackles topics such as RAPD which are related to areas like Major gene.
Andrea Patocchi interconnects Biotechnology and Resistance in the investigation of issues within Apple scab.
Her Malus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Quantitative trait locus, Plant disease resistance and Genotype.
The various areas that Andrea Patocchi examines in her Venturia inaequalis study include Genetic linkage and Molecular marker.
Her Botany study incorporates themes from Fire blight and Marker-assisted selection.
Her most cited work include:
- Microsatellite markers spanning the apple ( Malus x domestica Borkh.) genome (278 citations)
- The HcrVf2 gene from a wild apple confers scab resistance to a transgenic cultivated variety (215 citations)
- Apple contains receptor-like genes homologous to the Cladosporium fulvum resistance gene family of tomato with a cluster of genes cosegregating with Vf apple scab resistance. (145 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Andrea Patocchi spends much of her time researching Genetics, Venturia inaequalis, Apple scab, Malus and Botany.
Her study in Gene, Microsatellite, Genetic marker, Locus and Genome are all subfields of Genetics.
Her Venturia inaequalis research incorporates themes from Plant disease resistance, Molecular marker, Biotechnology, Genetic linkage and Gene mapping.
Andrea Patocchi is interested in Malus floribunda, which is a branch of Apple scab.
Her work carried out in the field of Malus brings together such families of science as Quantitative trait locus and Genetically modified organism.
While the research belongs to areas of Botany, Andrea Patocchi spends her time largely on the problem of Horticulture, intersecting her research to questions surrounding Cisgenesis.
She most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (43.94%)
- Venturia inaequalis (30.30%)
- Apple scab (30.30%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Cultivar (23.48%)
- Horticulture (23.48%)
- Cisgenesis (6.82%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of investigation include Cultivar, Horticulture, Cisgenesis, Fire blight and Genetics.
In general Horticulture, her work in Apple scab and Seedling is often linked to Galaxy linking many areas of study.
Her Apple scab study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Malus.
As part of one scientific family, Andrea Patocchi deals mainly with the area of Malus, narrowing it down to issues related to the Genome, and often Quantitative trait locus.
Her research on Genetics frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Venturia inaequalis.
Her work deals with themes such as Botany and Locus, which intersect with Plant disease resistance.
Between 2016 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- An integrated approach for increasing breeding efficiency in apple and peach in Europe (43 citations)
- Apple whole genome sequences: recent advances and new prospects. (32 citations)
- Epistatic fire blight resistance QTL alleles in the apple cultivar ‘Enterprise’ and selection X-6398 discovered and characterized through pedigree-informed analysis (30 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Andrea Patocchi mainly focuses on Quantitative trait locus, Cultivar, Fire blight, Plant disease resistance and Genomics.
She regularly links together related areas like Malus in her Quantitative trait locus studies.
Her studies in Cultivar integrate themes in fields like Epistasis, Pedigree chart, Allele, Erwinia and Single-nucleotide polymorphism.
Fire blight is a subfield of Genetics that Andrea Patocchi investigates.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Shoot, Agronomy, Resistance, Plant breeding and PEAR.
Her research integrates issues of Biotechnology and Germplasm in her study of Genomics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
