World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4122 3806 167 158 206 8889

Ted Sanders publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ted Sanders between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ted Sanders published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2009. 4 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2009. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1992 2025

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ted Sanders: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 5
1997 5
1998 2
1999 5
2000 9
2001 3
2002 7
2003 2
2004 5
2005 3
2006 7
2007 2
2008 13
2009 16
2010 7
2011 10
2012 14
2013 15
2014 14
2015 9
2016 12
2017 14
2018 7
2019 7
2020 3
2021 12
2022 3
2023 5
2024 2
2025 2
Total 226
Download as CSV

Ted Sanders publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Sanders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 206 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 206
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ted Sanders D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Sanders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ted Sanders is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily on the intersection of psychology and arts and humanities, with particular expertise in experimental and cognitive psychology as well as language and linguistics.

Sanders's research field spans various subfields, including:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Their main research topics cover:

  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Ted Sanders has published several papers, including the following recent works:

  • "Individual differences in expecting coherence relations: Exploring the variability in sensitivity to contextual signals in discourse," 2020, Discourse Processes
  • "Vivid elements in Dutch educational texts," 2020, Narrative Inquiry
  • "Causality, subjectivity and mental spaces: Insights from on-line discourse processing," 2020, Cognitive Linguistics
  • "Scolding the child who threw the scissors: Shaping discourse expectations by restricting referents," 2020, Language Cognition and Neuroscience
  • "Expectations from relative clauses: Real-time coherence updates in discourse processing," 2021, Cognition

Frequent collaborators of Sanders include:

  • Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul (9 joint publications)
  • Wilbert Spooren (7 joint publications)
  • Hongling Xiao (5 joint publications)
  • Jet Hoek (3 joint publications)
  • Aoju Chen (3 joint publications)

The scientist has published extensively in various venues, notably:

  • Discourse Processes
  • Cognitive Linguistics
  • Dialogue & Discourse
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Narrative Inquiry

Best Publications

  • Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations

    Ted J. M. Sanders;Wilbert P. M. Spooren;Leo G. M. Noordman

  • The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing

    Ted J. M. Sanders;Leo G. M. Noordman

  • The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages

    AlistaiLr Knott;Ted Sanders

  • Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation

    Ted J. M. Sanders;Wilbert P. M. Spooren;Leo G. M. Noordman

  • What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs

    Hans Rutger Bosker;Anne-France Pinget;Hugo Quené;Ted Sanders

  • Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context

    Ted Sanders

  • L1 use during L2 writing: an empirical study of a complex phenomenon

    Daphne van Weijen;Huub van den Bergh;Huub van den Bergh;Gert Rijlaarsdam;Ted Sanders

  • The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2

    Liesbeth Degand;Ted Sanders

  • The acquisition order of coherence relations : On cognitive complexity in discourse

    W.P.M.S. Spooren;T.J.M. Sanders

  • Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic Approaches

    T. Sanders;H. Pander Maat

  • Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use*

    Henk Pander Maat;Ted Sanders

  • Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements

    Anneloes R. Canestrelli;Willem M. Mak;Ted J. M. Sanders

  • Domains of use or subjectivity? The distribution of three Dutch causal connectives explained

    Henk Pander Maat;Ted Sanders

  • Effect of genre on the generalizability of writing scores

    Renske Bouwer;Anton Béguin;Ted Sanders;Huub van den Bergh

  • The emergence of Dutch connectives : How cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition

    Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul;Ted Sanders

  • Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out

    Judith Kamalski;Ted Sanders;Leo Lentz

  • Discourse and Text Structure

    T.J.M. Sanders;W.P.M.S. Spooren

  • Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives

    Ted Sanders;José Sanders;Eve Sweetser

  • Text representation as an interface between language and its users

    Ted Sanders;Wilbert Spooren

  • Text representation : linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects

    Ted Sanders;Joost Schilperoord;Wilbert Spooren

Frequent Co-Authors

Huub van den Bergh
Huub van den Bergh Utrecht University
Gert Rijlaarsdam
Gert Rijlaarsdam University of Amsterdam
Eve Sweetser
Eve Sweetser University of California, Berkeley
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
Nathalie M. Delzenne
Nathalie M. Delzenne Université Catholique de Louvain
Lluís Arola
Lluís Arola Rovira i Virgili University
Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Morton Ann Gernsbacher University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul van den Broek
Paul van den Broek Leiden University
Antal van den Bosch
Antal van den Bosch Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to rewarding careers in counseling, mental health, social work, and family support. Many students seek flexible educational options that allow them to graduate faster and start making an impact sooner.

For those passionate about helping individuals and communities, masters in social work accelerated programs offer a fast-tracked path to advanced licensure and roles in social services. Similarly, the fast track bachelor degree in psychology enables students to earn their degree quickly and pursue diverse opportunities in counseling, research, and behavioral health.

If you’re interested in becoming a counselor, explore cacrep-accredited counseling programs that meet professional standards for clinical training and open up pathways to licensure. Those looking to make a difference with families and couples can consider mft programs that provide specialized skills for working in marriage and family therapy.

Each of these online degree programs is designed for flexibility and affordability, making it easier than ever to balance your studies with work or personal commitments while preparing for a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Ted Sanders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles