World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
47751
World Ranking
1637
National Ranking
17

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
46242
World Ranking
8426
National Ranking
223

Francesco N. Tubiello publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco N. Tubiello sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Francesco N. Tubiello D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco N. Tubiello sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Francesco N. Tubiello is affiliated with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with 114 publications in this field. Within Environmental Science, their work spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering.

Their major research topics cover Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Environmental Impact and Sustainability, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies, Climate Change Policy and Economics, and Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Francesco N. Tubiello include Giulia Conchedda, Philippe Ciais, Glen P. Peters, Rona L. Thompson, and Ronny Lauerwald.

The primary venues where Francesco publishes include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Earth System Science Data, Nature Food, Environmental Research Letters, and Nature.

Notable recent papers by Francesco N. Tubiello include:

  • Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, 2021, Nature Food
  • The Global Methane Budget 2000-2017, 2020, NOAA Institutional Repository
  • A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks, 2020, Nature
  • Global Carbon Budget 2022, 2022, Earth System Science Data
  • Global Carbon Budget 2021, 2022, Earth System Science Data

Francesco N. Tubiello has contributed to book publications with FAO eBooks, including the title "Progress towards sustainable agriculture - Drivers of change" published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability : Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    Tarekegn Abeku;Pamela Abuodha;Francis Adesina;Neil Adger

  • The global methane budget 2000–2017

    Marielle Saunois;Ann R. Stavert;Ben Poulter;Philippe Bousquet

  • Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change

    S. Mark Howden;Jean François Soussana;Francesco N. Tubiello;Francesco N. Tubiello;Netra Chhetri

  • Global food security under climate change

    Josef Schmidhuber;Francesco N. Tubiello

  • Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions

    M. Crippa;E. Solazzo;D. Guizzardi;F. Monforti-Ferrario

  • Global Carbon Budget 2018

    Corinne Le Quéré;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks

    Hanquin Tian;Rongting Xu;Josep G. Canadell;Rona L. Thompson

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Pierre Friedlingstein;Pierre Friedlingstein;Matthew W. Jones;Michael O'Sullivan;Robbie Andrew

  • Food, fibre and forest products

    W.E. Easterling;P.K. Aggrawal;P. Batima;Keith Brander

  • Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080

    Günther Fischer;Mahendra Shah;Francesco N. Tubiello;Francesco N. Tubiello;Harrij van Velhuizen

  • Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU)

    Pete Smith;Mercedes Bustamante;Helal Ahammad;Harry Clark

  • Global Carbon Budget 2017

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2023

    Unknown

  • The global methane budget 2000–2012

    Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Ben Poulter;Anna Peregon

  • Crop and pasture response to climate change

    Francesco N. Tubiello;Jean François Soussana;S. Mark Howden

  • Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6

    George C. Hurtt;Louise Chini;Ritvik Sahajpal;Steve Frolking

  • Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: Effects of mitigation, 1990-2080

    Günther Fischer;Francesco N. Tubiello;Francesco N. Tubiello;Harrij van Velthuizen;David A. Wiberg

  • Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods

    Xiaoming Xu;Prateek Sharma;Shijie Shu;Tzu-Shun Lin

  • Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change

    Cynthia Rosenzweig;Cynthia Rosenzweig;Francesco N. Tubiello;Richard Goldberg;Evan Mills

  • How much land based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals

    Pete Smith;Helmut Haberl;Alexander Popp;Karl Heinz Erb

  • The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

    Francesco N Tubiello;Mirella Salvatore;Simone Rossi;Alessandro Ferrara

  • Global Methane Budget 2000-2012

    M. Saunois;P. Bousquet;B. Poulter;A. Peregon

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia Rosenzweig
Cynthia Rosenzweig Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Hanqin Tian
Hanqin Tian Auburn University
Glen P. Peters
Glen P. Peters Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Julia Pongratz
Julia Pongratz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Prabir K. Patra
Prabir K. Patra Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Greet Janssens-Maenhout
Greet Janssens-Maenhout European Commission
Robert B. Jackson
Robert B. Jackson Stanford University
Peter Smith
Peter Smith University of Aberdeen
Josep G. Canadell
Josep G. Canadell Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Nicolas Viovy
Nicolas Viovy French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring interdisciplinary fields such as sociology can be highly beneficial. Pursuing a sociology bachelor degree online offers insights into human behavior and social dynamics, which are crucial for addressing environmental challenges in communities.

Advanced degrees that combine education and environmental issues are also gaining traction. Many professionals seek accelerated options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation to deepen their understanding without lengthy commitments. This pathway can streamline career growth while contributing to sustainable policies and practices.

A smooth transition from master's to doctoral levels is important for educators focusing on environmental advocacy. Some universities offer the best eds to edd programs, enabling professionals to continue elevating their academic and practical impact in environmental education.

Social work closely intersects with environmental justice, making a dsw program a valuable option. These programs prepare graduates to address social disparities related to environmental issues, ensuring equitable community support and intervention.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco N. Tubiello

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles