World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
12114
World Ranking
6716
National Ranking
2965

Aly A. Farag publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aly A. Farag sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 418 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Aly A. Farag D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aly A. Farag sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to image modeling and biomedical applications

Overview

Aly A. Farag is affiliated with the University of Louisville in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a strong emphasis on Computer Science and Medicine.

The main fields of study for Farag include:

  • Computer Science (16 publications)
  • Medicine (11 publications)

Within these broader fields, Farag's work delves into several subfields such as:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (7 publications)
  • Education (6 publications)
  • Oncology (5 publications)
  • Artificial Intelligence (4 publications)
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (4 publications)

The scientist focuses on specific research topics, notably:

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 publications)
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition (6 publications)
  • Online Learning and Analytics (4 publications)
  • Innovative Teaching Methods (4 publications)
  • Online and Blended Learning (4 publications)
  • Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (4 publications)
  • Radiology practices and education (4 publications)

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include:

  • Asem Ali (13 collaborations)
  • Islam Alkabbany (8 collaborations)
  • Ahmed Abdelkawy (4 collaborations)
  • Thomas R. Tretter (3 collaborations)
  • Nicholas C. Hindy (3 collaborations)

Farag regularly publishes in several academic venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 4 publications
  • Sensors with 2 publications
  • Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology with 2 publications
  • COJ Electronics & Communications with 2 publications
  • Bioengineering with 1 publication

Recent papers highlight a blend of machine learning, healthcare applications, and computer vision:

  • "ECG Heartbeat Classification Using Machine Learning and Metaheuristic Optimization for Smart Healthcare Systems," 2023, Bioengineering
  • "An Experimental Platform for Real-Time Students Engagement Measurements from Video in STEM Classrooms," 2023, Sensors
  • "An AI-Based Colonic Polyp Classifier for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Abdominal CT," 2022, Sensors
  • "EPAM-Net: An efficient pose-driven attention-guided multimodal network for video action recognition," 2025, Neurocomputing
  • "G-SET-DCL: a guided sequential episodic training with dual contrastive learning approach for colon segmentation," 2025, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Aly A. Farag was awarded the IEEE Fellow distinction in 2014 for contributions to image modeling and biomedical applications.

Best Publications

  • A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data

    M.N. Ahmed;S.M. Yamany;N. Mohamed;A.A. Farag

  • CSIFT: A SIFT Descriptor with Color Invariant Characteristics

    A.E. Abdel-Hakim;A.A. Farag

  • MultiStencils Fast Marching Methods: A Highly Accurate Solution to the Eikonal Equation on Cartesian Domains

    M.S. Hassouna;A.A. Farag

  • Classification algorithms for quantitative tissue characterization of diffuse liver disease from ultrasound images

    Y.M. Kadah;A.A. Farag;J.M. Zurada;A.M. Badawi

  • Surface signatures: an orientation independent free-form surface representation scheme for the purpose of objects registration and matching

    S.M. Yamany;A.A. Farag

  • A system for human jaw modeling using intra-oral images

    S.M. Yamany;A.A. Farag

  • Precise segmentation of multimodal images

    A.A. Farag;A.S. El-Baz;G. Gimel'farb

  • Nonmetric calibration of camera lens distortion: differential methods and robust estimation

    M. Ahmed;A. Farag

  • System and method for 3-D digital reconstruction of an oral cavity from a sequence of 2-D images

    Aly A. Farag;David Tasman;Sameh M. Yamany

  • A Novel Approach for Lung Nodules Segmentation in Chest CT Using Level Sets

    Amal A. Farag;Hossam E. Abd El Munim;James H. Graham;Aly A. Farag

  • Modified fuzzy c-mean in medical image segmentation

    N.A. Mohamed;M.N. Ahmed;A. Farag

  • Free-form surface registration using surface signatures

    S.M. Yamany;A.A. Farag

  • Two-stage neural network for volume segmentation of medical images

    Mohamed N. Ahmed;Aly A. Farag

  • Robust centerline extraction framework using level sets

    M.S. Hassouna;A.A. Farag

  • Graph cuts framework for kidney segmentation with prior shape constraints

    Asem M. Ali;Aly A. Farag;Ayman S. El-Baz

  • Cerebrovascular segmentation from TOF using stochastic models

    M. Sabry Hassouna;Aly A. Farag;Stephen G. Hushek;Thomas Moriarty

  • A unified framework for MAP estimation in remote sensing image segmentation

    A.A. Farag;R.M. Mohamed;A. El-Baz

  • A new genetic-based technique for matching 3-D curves and surfaces☆

    Sameh M. Yamany;Mohamed N. Ahmed;Aly A. Farag

  • Edge linking by sequential search

    Aly A. Farag;Edward J. Delp

  • Variational Curve Skeletons Using Gradient Vector Flow

    M.S. Hassouna;A.A. Farag

  • Non-contact and passive measurement of arterial pulse through thermal IR imaging, and analysis of thermal IR imagery

    Aly A. Farag;Sergey Y. Chekmenev

Frequent Co-Authors

Ayman El-Baz
Ayman El-Baz University of Louisville
Georgy Gimel'farb
Georgy Gimel'farb University of Auckland
Manuel F. Casanova
Manuel F. Casanova University of South Carolina
Edward J. Delp
Edward J. Delp Purdue University West Lafayette
Jacek M. Zurada
Jacek M. Zurada University of Louisville
Terrance E. Boult
Terrance E. Boult University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Javier R. Movellan
Javier R. Movellan University of California, San Diego
Sébastien Marcel
Sébastien Marcel Idiap Research Institute
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Jay N. Giedd
Jay N. Giedd University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA also opens doors to many other online degrees and advanced career opportunities. For those aiming at leadership roles in business and technology, an executive online mba provides management skills tailored for working professionals. This pathway is ideal for IT specialists transitioning into executive positions.

If your interests blend information technology and information management, a mlis degree online cost guide is essential. These programs teach you how to organize digital information—a critical skill for data-driven industries.

Graduate studies don’t have to be expensive. There are plenty of cheap online masters programs covering computer science, analytics, and technology management, helping you upskill without a heavy financial burden.

For those seeking top leadership roles in technology and organizational change, pursuing a doctorate in organizational leadership online can be the next logical step. These degrees focus on strategic leadership, innovation, and large-scale technology transformation.

Best Scientists Citing Aly A. Farag

Trending Scientists