World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
6164
World Ranking
13423
National Ranking
5371

Rashmi Prasad publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rashmi Prasad sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 75 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rashmi Prasad D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rashmi Prasad sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rashmi Prasad is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in the United States, focusing primarily on the field of Engineering. Their research work encompasses multiple subfields, including Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's research topics prominently include Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena, Numerical methods in engineering, Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation, Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures, Elasticity and Wave Propagation, Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization, and Elasticity and Material Modeling.

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Journal of Thermal Stresses
  • Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
  • Waves in Random and Complex Media
  • European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids
  • Archive of Applied Mechanics

The following papers authored or coauthored by Rashmi Prasad provide insight into their research areas:

  • On the characterization and stability of plane waves under hyperbolic two-temperature generalized thermoelasticity, 2020, Journal of Thermal Stresses
  • Representation of solutions of strain gradient dual-phase-lag thermoelasticity and effects of scale-length parameter in half-space, 2022, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids
  • Magneto-thermoelastic wave propagation in a finitely conducting medium: A comparative study for three types of thermoelasticity I, II, and III, 2021, Journal of Thermal Stresses
  • Thermoelastic interactions on hyperbolic two-temperature generalized thermoelasticity in an infinite medium with a cylindrical cavity, 2020, European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids
  • Reciprocal and variational theorems on the two-temperature Green-Lindsay thermoelasticity theory, 2022, Archive of Applied Mechanics

Rashmi Prasad frequently collaborates with several coauthors including:

  • Roushan Kumar
  • Satyam Sachan
  • Rakhi Tiwari
  • J.C. Misra
  • Ravi Kumar

Best Publications

  • The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0.

    Rashmi Prasad;Nikhil Dinesh;Alan Lee;Eleni Miltsakaki

  • The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 Annotation Manual

    Rashmi Prasad;Eleni Miltsakaki;Nikhil Dinesh;Alan Lee

  • Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers

    Yuji Matsumoto;Rashmi Prasad

  • The Penn Discourse Treebank

    Eleni Miltsakaki;Rashmi Prasad;Aravind K. Joshi;Bonnie L. Webber

  • The Penn Discourse TreeBank 1.0 Annotation Manual

    Rashmi Prasad;Eleni Miltsakaki;Nikhil Dinesh;Alan Lee

  • Trainable Sentence Planning for Complex Information Presentations in Spoken Dialog Systems

    Amanda Stent;Rashmi Prassad;Marilyn Walker

  • The CoNLL-2015 Shared Task on Shallow Discourse Parsing

    Nianwen Xue;Hwee Tou Ng;Sameer Pradhan;Rashmi Prasad

  • Individual and domain adaptation in sentence planning for dialogue

    Marilyn Walker;Amanda Stent;François Mairesse;Rashmi Prasad

  • Annotating Discourse Connectives and Their Arguments.

    Eleni Miltsakaki;Aravind K. Joshi;Rashmi Prasad;Bonnie L. Webber

  • Realization of Discourse Relations by Other Means: Alternative Lexicalizations

    Rashmi Prasad;Aravind Joshi;Bonnie Webber

  • Reflections on the penn discourse treebank, comparable corpora, and complementary annotation

    Rashmi Prasad;Bonnie Webber;Aravind Joshi

  • D-LTAG System: Discourse Parsing with a Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar

    Katherine Forbes;Eleni Miltsakaki;Rashmi Prasad;Anoop Sarkar

  • DARPA communicator: Cross-system results for the 2001 evaluation

    Marilyn A. Walker;Alexander I. Rudnicky;Rashmi Prasad;John S. Aberdeen

  • The biomedical discourse relation bank.

    Rashmi Prasad;Susan McRoy;Nadya Frid;Aravind K. Joshi

  • Question Generation from Paragraphs at UPenn: QGSTEC System Description

    Prashanth Mannem;Rashmi Prasad;Aravind Joshi

  • Attribution and the (Non-)Alignment of Syntactic and Discourse Arguments of Connectives

    Nikhil Dinesh;Alan Lee;Eleni Miltsakaki;Rashmi Prasad

  • Experiments on Sense Annotations and Sense Disambiguation of Discourse Connectives

    Eleni Miltsakaki;Nikhil Dinesh;Rashmi Prasad;Aravind Joshi

  • Annotation of Discourse Relations for Conversational Spoken Dialogs

    Sara Tonelli;Giuseppe Riccardi;Rashmi Prasad;Aravind K. Joshi

  • Using entity features to classify implicit discourse relations

    Annie Louis;Aravind Joshi;Rashmi Prasad;Ani Nenkova

  • The Hindi Discourse Relation Bank

    Umangi Oza;Rashmi Prasad;Sudheer Kolachina;Dipti Misra Sharma

  • DARPA Communicator Evaluation: Progress from 2000 to 2001

    Marilyn A. Walker;Alexander I. Rudnicky;John S. Aberdeen;Elizabeth Owen Bratt

  • Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse and Discourse Semantics Workshop Proceedings

    Katherine Forbes;Eleni Miltsakaki;Rashmi Prasad;Anoop Sarkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Aravind K. Joshi
Aravind K. Joshi University of Pennsylvania
Bonnie Webber
Bonnie Webber University of Edinburgh
Marilyn A. Walker
Marilyn A. Walker University of California, Santa Cruz
Srinivas Bangalore
Srinivas Bangalore Interactions LLC
Hong Yu
Hong Yu University of Massachusetts Lowell
Amanda Stent
Amanda Stent Colby College
James C. Lester
James C. Lester North Carolina State University
Alexandros Potamianos
Alexandros Potamianos National Technical University of Athens
Alexander I. Rudnicky
Alexander I. Rudnicky Carnegie Mellon University
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to diverse technology careers, but it's also worth exploring related online degrees that offer flexible learning and strong job prospects. Many students now consider a computer science degree online, giving them the opportunity to balance their studies with work or family commitments. These programs are often accelerated and designed for today’s busy lifestyles.

If you’re interested in applying computing skills to pressing global challenges, you might also consider an engineering or science pathway. For example, environmental science and engineering degrees remain in high demand. Curious about what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree? You could work in sustainability, policy, consulting, or research.

Engineering remains a popular choice as well. There are flexible online environmental engineering degree science and engineering options, as well as programs focused on affordability like a mechanical engineering degree cost. Whatever your interest, online learning makes it easier to get started in these growing careers.

Best Scientists Citing Rashmi Prasad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles