World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7134
World Ranking
11089
National Ranking
4606

Amanda Stent publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Stent sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amanda Stent D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Stent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Amanda Stent is affiliated with Colby College in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, and Management Information Systems.

Stent's research covers a range of topics such as:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques

The scientist has authored papers in notable venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Amanda Stent include:

  • "Best Practices for Managing Data Annotation Projects," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Learning to Look Inside: Augmenting Token-Based Encoders with Character-Level Information," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Harnessing GANs for Zero-Shot Learning of New Classes in Visual Speech Recognition," 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Among frequent collaborators are Dhruva Sahrawat, Debanjan Mahata, Yaman Kumar, Rajiv Ratn Shah, and Roger Zimmermann, each having co-authored multiple works with Stent.

Amanda Stent was recognized with the ACM Senior Member award in 2012, marking a notable designation in the computing community.

Best Publications

  • Toward Conversational Human-Computer Interaction

    James F. Allen;Donna K. Byron;Myroslava O. Dzikovska;George Ferguson

  • TVSum: Summarizing web videos using titles

    Yale Song;Jordi Vallmitjana;Amanda Stent;Alejandro Jaimes

  • An architecture for more realistic conversational systems

    James Allen;George Ferguson;Amanda Stent

  • MATCH: An Architecture for Multimodal Dialogue Systems

    Michael Johnston;SrinivasBangalore;Gunaranjan Vasireddy;Amanda Stent

  • Authentication Techniques Utilizing a Computing Device

    Ilija Zeljkovic;Robert J. Andres;Jerry Birkes;W. Drake Ii Alton

  • Systems and methods for creating and using geo-centric language models

    Amanda Stent;Diamantino Caseiro;Ilija Zeljkovic;Jay Wilpon

  • The CommandTalk Spoken Dialogue System

    Amanda Stent;John Doweling;Jean Mark Gawron;Elizabeth Owen Bratt

  • An architecture for a generic dialogue shell

    James Allen;Donna Byron;Myroslava Dzikovska;George Ferguson

  • Geo-Centric Language Models for Local Business Voice Search

    Amanda Stent;Ilija Zeljkovic;Diamantino Caseiro;Jay Wilpon

  • Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers)

    Marilyn Walker;Heng Ji;Amanda Stent

  • It Depends: Dependency Parser Comparison Using A Web-based Evaluation Tool

    Jinho D. Choi;Joel Tetreault;Amanda Stent

  • Trainable Sentence Planning for Complex Information Presentations in Spoken Dialog Systems

    Amanda Stent;Rashmi Prassad;Marilyn Walker

  • Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue

    Marilyn A. Walker;Steve Whittaker;Amanda Stent;Preetam Maloor

  • Learning the Structure of Task-Driven Human–Human Dialogs

    S. Bangalore;G. Di Fabbrizio;A. Stent

  • Individual and domain adaptation in sentence planning for dialogue

    Marilyn Walker;Amanda Stent;François Mairesse;Rashmi Prasad

  • Evaluating evaluation methods for generation in the presence of variation

    Amanda Stent;Matthew Marge;Mohit Singhai

  • Hearsay: enabling audio browsing on hypertext content

    I. V. Ramakrishnan;Amanda Stent;Guizhen Yang

  • System and method for segmenting and identifying event in image by using voice annotation

    Alexander C Loui;Amanda J Stent;ジェイ ステント アマンダ;シー ルイ アリグザンダー

  • More Content - Less Control: Access Control in the Web 2.0

    Michael Hart;Rob Johnson;Amanda Stent

  • A Hybrid Approach to Multi-document Summarization of Opinions in Reviews

    Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio;Amanda Stent;Robert Gaizauskas

  • Learning the Structure of Task-Driven Human-Human Dialogs

    Srinivas Bangalore;Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio;Amanda Stent

Frequent Co-Authors

Srinivas Bangalore
Srinivas Bangalore Interactions LLC
Marilyn A. Walker
Marilyn A. Walker University of California, Santa Cruz
James F. Allen
James F. Allen University of Rochester
I. V. Ramakrishnan
I. V. Ramakrishnan Stony Brook University
Michael V. Johnston
Michael V. Johnston Kennedy Krieger Institute
Roger Zimmermann
Roger Zimmermann National University of Singapore
Dragomir R. Radev
Dragomir R. Radev Yale University
Steve Whittaker
Steve Whittaker University of California, Santa Cruz
Joel Tetreault
Joel Tetreault Yahoo (United Kingdom)
Alexander C. Loui
Alexander C. Loui Rochester Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science studies in the USA opens doors to multiple online degree options that can suit different career goals and timelines. Many learners seek the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of remote study, especially for advancing or shifting their professional pathways.

For those looking to specialize further, affordable doctoral programs offer rigorous academic advancement without the burden of high tuition fees. If you want to earn your doctorate on an accelerated timeline, check out the quickest edd program options, which are designed to save both time and expenses.

Not everyone opts for a lengthy degree path. Practical, career-focused learners may consider online associate degree programs that can be completed in as little as six months, providing fast entry into the technology workforce.

Combining technical skills with business expertise is also becoming increasingly popular. For versatile career opportunities, look into earning a business degree online to complement your computing knowledge and boost your leadership potential.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Stent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles