World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
15422
World Ranking
2900
National Ranking
169

Johanna D. Moore publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna D. Moore sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 246 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Johanna D. Moore D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna D. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Johanna D. Moore is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. The main fields of study in their research include Computer Science, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Their work spans various subfields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Education, Artificial Intelligence, and Communication.

The scientist's research topics cover several key areas, notably:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Spam and Phishing Detection

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Johanna D. Moore are:

  • Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good the Bad and the OMG! (2021), published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students' self-regulated learning (2022), published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • Towards investigating the validity of measurement of self-regulated learning based on trace data (2022), published in Metacognition and Learning
  • Improving the measurement of self-regulated learning using multi-channel data (2022), published in Metacognition and Learning
  • Towards a fuller picture: Triangulation and integration of the measurement of self-regulated learning based on trace and think aloud data (2023), published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

The frequent co-authors associated with Johanna D. Moore include:

  • Dragan Gašević
  • Lyn Lim
  • Maria Bannert
  • Joep van der Graaf
  • Yizhou Fan

Publication venues with multiple contributions from this researcher include:

  • Metacognition and Learning
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Learning Analytics
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Johanna D. Moore was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good the Bad and the OMG!

    Efthymios Kouloumpis;Theresa Wilson;Johanna D. Moore

  • Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Johanna Moore

  • Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization

    Gabriel Murray;Steve Renals;Jean Carletta;Johanna Moore

  • Planning text for advisory dialogues: capturing intentional and rhetorical information

    Johanna D. Moore;Cécile L. Paris

  • A problem for RST: the need for multi-level discourse analysis

    Johanna D. Moore;Martha E. Pollack

  • A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming.

    David Reitter;Frank Keller;Johanna D. Moore

  • Latent Semantic Analysis for Text Segmentation

    Freddy Y. Y. Choi;Peter M. Wiemer-Hastings;Johanna D. Moore

  • A Reactive Approach to Explanation: Taking the User’s Feedback into Account

    Johanna D. Moore;William R. Swartout

  • Explanations in knowledge systems: design for explainable expert systems

    W. Swartout;C. Paris;J. Moore

  • Enhanced Maintenance and Explanation of Expert Systems Through Explicit Models of Their Development

    R. Neches;W.R. Swartout;J.D. Moore

  • Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue

    David Reitter;Johanna D. Moore

  • A reactive approach to explanation

    Johanna D. Moore;William R. Swartout

  • PLANNING TEXT FOR ADVISORY DIALOGUES

    Johanna D. Moore;Cecile L. Paris

  • Participating in explanatory dialogues: interpreting and responding to questions in context

    Johanna D. Moore

  • Explanation in second generation expert systems

    William R. Swartout;Johanna D. Moore

  • Decomposition and causality in partial-order planning

    R. Michael Young;Martha E. Pollack;Johanna D. Moore

  • Generating tailored, comparative descriptions in spoken dialogue

    Johanna D. Moore;Mary Ellen Foster;Oliver Lemon;Michael White

  • Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments

    Giuseppe Carenini;Johanna D. Moore

  • Toward a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure

    Megan Moser;Johanna D. Moore

  • Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue

    Marilyn A. Walker;Steve Whittaker;Amanda Stent;Preetam Maloor

  • An intelligent interactive system for delivering individualized information to patients

    Bruce G. Buchanan;Johanna D. Moore;Diana E. Forsythe;Giuseppe Carenini

  • Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08)

    Kallirroi Georgila;Maria Wolters;Vasilis Karaiskos;Melissa Kronenthal

  • Proceedings of Interspeech 2008

    Johanna Moore;Martin Tietze;Vera Demberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Carenini
Giuseppe Carenini University of British Columbia
Steven F. Roth
Steven F. Roth Carnegie Mellon University
William R. Swartout
William R. Swartout University of Southern California
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
Jean Carletta
Jean Carletta University of Edinburgh
Steve Renals
Steve Renals University of Edinburgh
Marilyn A. Walker
Marilyn A. Walker University of California, Santa Cruz
Cécile Paris
Cécile Paris Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Robert Dale
Robert Dale Macquarie University
Dragan Gasevic
Dragan Gasevic Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online study options and interdisciplinary career paths. Many students are looking for flexible, time-efficient programs, with the accelerated cs degree route being popular for those who wish to enter the workforce quickly.

Related fields such as engineering and physics are also accessible through online education. You can consider specializations like environmental engineering degrees online, connecting tech skills with sustainability concerns for in-demand green jobs.

Cost is another key consideration, with resources that compare mechanical engineering degree online cost and highlight programs suitable for a variety of budgets. Additionally, science-focused students can find the cheapest online physics degree options to broaden their expertise.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you tailor your education to match your career goals and financial plan, while enjoying the flexibility of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Johanna D. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles