World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6734 6503 352 347 451 5474
Environmental Sciences 42 7495 7202 283 275 471 5695

Goen Ho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Goen Ho between 1967 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Goen Ho published across 55 years, from 1967 to 2021, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2007. 6 of the 486 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2007. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 2 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 6 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 28 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 30 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications
1967 2021

486 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Goen Ho: publications per year, 1967 to 2021
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 2
1969 2
1970 4
1971 0
1972 0
1973 2
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 2
1979 3
1980 1
1981 6
1982 2
1983 4
1984 5
1985 6
1986 1
1987 3
1988 4
1989 8
1990 3
1991 28
1992 13
1993 11
1994 15
1995 16
1996 11
1997 8
1998 19
1999 21
2000 16
2001 16
2002 16
2003 14
2004 22
2005 18
2006 12
2007 30
2008 21
2009 22
2010 5
2011 14
2012 11
2013 16
2014 5
2015 7
2016 8
2017 12
2018 6
2019 5
2020 3
2021 3
Total 486
Download as CSV

Goen Ho publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Goen Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 448–457 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 451 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60 451
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Goen Ho D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Goen Ho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Organic chemistry

Goen Ho focuses on Environmental engineering, Waste management, Wastewater, Amendment and Red mud. His Environmental engineering study incorporates themes from Electrochemistry, Waste disposal and Environmental impact assessment. His Waste management research includes elements of Environmental chemistry, Wind power, Renewable energy and Desalination.

His Environmental chemistry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Organic matter, Municipal solid waste, Propionate and Compost. The Wastewater study combines topics in areas such as Precipitation, Sewage, Field conditions, Effluent and Methane. His studies in Red mud integrate themes in fields like Gypsum and Bauxite.

His most cited work include:

  • The role of indigenous microorganisms in suppression of Salmonella regrowth in composted biosolids. (159 citations)
  • Regrowth of faecal coliforms and salmonellae in stored biosolids and soil amended with biosolids (127 citations)
  • Affinity of microbial fuel cell biofilm for the anodic potential. (88 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Waste management, Environmental engineering, Environmental planning, Wastewater and Sewage treatment. The study incorporates disciplines such as Pulp and paper industry and Anaerobic digestion in addition to Waste management. His research integrates issues of Desalination and Irrigation in his study of Environmental engineering.

He regularly links together related areas like Reverse osmosis in his Desalination studies. Goen Ho interconnects Sanitation, Reuse, Environmental technology, Environmental resource management and Sustainability in the investigation of issues within Environmental planning. His work on Wastewater is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Sewage.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Waste management (24.70%)
  • Environmental engineering (23.49%)
  • Environmental planning (17.07%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2021)?

  • Desalination (7.03%)
  • Environmental engineering (23.49%)
  • Waste management (24.70%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Desalination, Environmental engineering, Waste management, Environmental planning and Anaerobic digestion are his primary areas of study. Goen Ho connects Environmental engineering with Life-cycle assessment in his research. His Waste management study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Energy development.

Goen Ho has researched Environmental planning in several fields, including Sanitation, Sustainability, Rainwater harvesting and Environmental resource management. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Thermophile, Carbon, Biodegradable waste and Pulp and paper industry. His Pulp and paper industry research incorporates elements of Wastewater, Activated sludge and Leachate.

Between 2010 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Mitigating ammonia inhibition of thermophilic anaerobic treatment of digested piggery wastewater: Use of pH reduction, zeolite, biomass and humic acid (88 citations)
  • Novel Methanogenic Rotatable Bioelectrochemical System Operated with Polarity Inversion (58 citations)
  • The role of water-energy nexus in optimising water supply systems – Review of techniques and approaches (54 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Agriculture
  • Organic chemistry

His scientific interests lie mostly in Desalination, Waste management, Environmental engineering, Anaerobic digestion and Biofilm. His Desalination research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Reverse osmosis and Environmental planning. His Waste management study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Ammonia and Ammonium.

He does research in Environmental engineering, focusing on Water supply specifically. His Biofilm study also includes fields such as

  • Biofouling which intersects with area such as Membrane fouling,
  • Membrane together with Microbiology. Goen Ho has included themes like Thermophile, Wastewater and Propionate in his Methane study.

Best Publications

  • The role of indigenous microorganisms in suppression of Salmonella regrowth in composted biosolids.

    J Sidhu;R.A Gibbs;G.E Ho;I Unkovich

  • Regrowth of faecal coliforms and salmonellae in stored biosolids and soil amended with biosolids

    R. A. Gibbs;C. J. Hu;G. E. Ho;I. Unkovich

  • The role of water-energy nexus in optimising water supply systems – Review of techniques and approaches

    Negar Vakilifard;Martin Anda;Parisa A. Bahri;Goen Ho

  • Reedbeds for greywater treatment—case study in Santa Elena-Monteverde, Costa Rica, Central America

    Stewart Dallas;Brian Scheffe;Goen Ho

  • Mitigating ammonia inhibition of thermophilic anaerobic treatment of digested piggery wastewater: Use of pH reduction, zeolite, biomass and humic acid

    L. Ho;G. Ho

  • Vermiculture as a tool for domestic wastewater management

    O. Bajsa;J. Nair;K. Mathew;G.E. Ho

  • Affinity of microbial fuel cell biofilm for the anodic potential.

    Ka Yu Cheng;Goen Ho;Ralf Cord-Ruwisch

  • Anodophilic biofilm catalyzes cathodic oxygen reduction.

    Ka Yu Cheng;Goen Ho;Ralf Cord-Ruwisch

  • Environmental life cycle assessment of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant powered by renewable energy.

    Maedeh P. Shahabi;Adam McHugh;Martin Anda;Goen Ho

  • Use Of Waste Gypsum In The Revegetation On Red Mud Deposits: A Greenhouse Study

    Jonathan W C Wong;G. E. ho

  • Review - Bacteria and their extracellular polymeric substances causing biofouling on seawater reverse osmosis desalination membranes

    Veena Nagaraj;Lucy Skillman;Dan Li;Goen Ho

  • Effects of gypsum and sewage sludge amendment on physical properties of fine bauxite refining residue

    Jonathan W C Wong;G. E. Ho

  • The effects of clay amendment and composting on metal speciation in digested sludge

    Liang Qiao;Goen Ho

  • Novel Methanogenic Rotatable Bioelectrochemical System Operated with Polarity Inversion

    Ka Yu Cheng;Goen Ho;Ralf Cord-Ruwisch

  • The role of the submergent macrophyte Triglochin huegelii in domestic greywater treatment

    Ross Mars;Kuruvilla Mathew;Goen Ho

  • Impact of heavy metals on enzymatic activity of substrate and on composting worms Eisenia fetida

    Christopher Malley;Jaya Nair;Goen Ho

  • Ethanol from lignocellulose using crude unprocessed cellulase from solid-state fermentation.

    Mitchell Lever;Goen Ho;Ralf Cord-Ruwisch

  • Struvite (MgNH4PO4·6H2O) Solubility and Its Application to a Piggery Effluent Problem

    K. M. Webb;G. E. Ho

  • Sewage sludge as organic ameliorant for revegetation of fine bauxite refining residue

    Jonathan W.C. Wong;Goen Ho

  • Integrated waste management

    Robert Hughes;Martin Anda;Goen Ho;Kuruvilla Mathew

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Newman
Peter Newman Curtin University
Dan Li
Dan Li University of Melbourne
Richard W. Bell
Richard W. Bell Murdoch University
Parisa A. Bahri
Parisa A. Bahri Murdoch University
Jonathan W.C. Wong
Jonathan W.C. Wong Hong Kong Baptist University
Edward G. Barrett-Lennard
Edward G. Barrett-Lennard University of Western Australia
Amit Gross
Amit Gross Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Farhad Shahnia
Farhad Shahnia Murdoch University
Simon Toze
Simon Toze Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As demand grows for engineering and technology roles, online education has made it easier than ever to gain specialized skills. Many students are turning to short certificate programs that pay well, allowing for a faster entry into the workforce or upskilling for career advancement. These programs offer focused learning in areas like information technology, project management, and engineering software, often leading to high-paying jobs.

Flexibility is also crucial, especially for non-traditional learners. The best degrees for moms going back to school cater to individuals balancing family, work, and education. These programs provide adaptable schedules and support services to help students succeed no matter their circumstances.

For those seeking efficiency, many colleges now offer college classes online that can be completed in as little as six weeks, ensuring a rapid path to course completion and credentials. Professionals aiming to change careers or specialize further often seek out accelerated online finance degree programs or similar intensive tracks in technology fields.

Whether you're beginning your journey or seeking advancement, exploring online pathways in engineering, technology, or related disciplines can provide the flexibility and return on investment you need.

Best Scientists Citing Goen Ho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles