What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- World War II
- Law
- Capitalism
His primary areas of study are Panel data, Happiness, Demographic economics, Life satisfaction and Well-being.
His Panel data research incorporates elements of Job satisfaction and Set.
His study on Easterlin paradox is often connected to Valuation as part of broader study in Happiness.
The concepts of his Easterlin paradox study are interwoven with issues in Happiness economics and Social comparison theory.
His work carried out in the field of Life satisfaction brings together such families of science as Macroeconomics, Unemployment, Actuarial science and Demography.
Paul Frijters interconnects Economic growth, Equivalence, Public economics, Mathematical economics and Welfare in the investigation of issues within Well-being.
His most cited work include:
- How Important is Methodology for the estimates of the determinants of Happiness (2052 citations)
- Relative income, happiness, and utility : an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles (1904 citations)
- The Anatomy of Subjective Well-being (658 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Demographic economics, Life satisfaction, Labour economics, Panel data and Happiness.
Paul Frijters has included themes like Test, Survey data collection and China in his Demographic economics study.
The Life satisfaction study which covers Demography that intersects with Cohort.
His research in Labour economics intersects with topics in Productivity, Incentive, Unemployment and Human capital.
His study focuses on the intersection of Panel data and fields such as Socioeconomic status with connections in the field of Longevity.
His specific area of interest is Happiness, where he studies Easterlin paradox.
He most often published in these fields:
- Demographic economics (21.25%)
- Life satisfaction (18.68%)
- Labour economics (15.75%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Life satisfaction (18.68%)
- Demographic economics (21.25%)
- Public relations (2.20%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Life satisfaction, Demographic economics, Public relations, Government and Context.
His studies deal with areas such as Actuarial science, Instrumental variable, Willingness to pay, Developmental psychology and Fixed effects model as well as Life satisfaction.
The various areas that Paul Frijters examines in his Developmental psychology study include Association, Personality, Developing country, Extraversion and introversion and Happiness.
His study in Happiness is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Religious studies, Well-being and Law and economics.
He combines Demographic economics and Brexit in his research.
His Government research includes themes of Ideal, Ideology, Politics and Agency.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Who got the Brexit blues? The effect of Brexit on subjective wellbeing in the UK (20 citations)
- Life satisfaction, QALYs, and the monetary value of health. (16 citations)
- A Happy Choice: Wellbeing as the Goal of Government (13 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- World War II
- Law
- Capitalism
Paul Frijters mostly deals with Life satisfaction, Government, Market economy, Sample and China.
Paul Frijters performs multidisciplinary study in the fields of Life satisfaction and Need to know via his papers.
Paul Frijters has researched Government in several fields, including Agency, Public relations, Public policy, Ideal and Politics.
His Market economy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Business cycle, Macroeconomics and Economic system.
His research integrates issues of Preference, Referendum and Demographic economics in his study of Sample.
Paul Frijters combines subjects such as Enforcement, Labour economics, Welfare, World War II and Distribution with his study of China.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
