World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
55
Citations
10734
World Ranking
1078
National Ranking
23

Mark Wooden publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wooden sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 303 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Mark Wooden D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wooden sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Wooden is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and conducts research primarily in the social sciences and health professions. Their work spans various subfields including general health professions, sociology and political science, demography, gender studies, and health.

The research topics covered by Mark Wooden focus notably on employment and welfare studies, gender, labor, and family dynamics, as well as retirement, disability, and employment. Their academic inquiry also addresses health disparities and outcomes, work-family balance challenges, workplace health and well-being, and impacts stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mark Wooden has contributed to numerous academic publications, including recent papers such as:

  • "Data Resource Profile: Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey," 2024, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology
  • "The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey," 2020, published in Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik
  • "Working from Home and Work-Family Conflict," 2022, published in Work Employment and Society
  • "Trends in the Prevalence of Psychological Distress Over Time: Comparing Results From Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys," 2020, published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Does solo self-employment serve as a 'stepping stone' to employership?," 2020, published in Labour Economics

The main venues where Mark Wooden's research has appeared include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Australian Economic Review, SSM - Population Health, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, and Work Employment and Society.

Frequent collaborators in Mark Wooden's research are:

  • Irma Mooi-Reci
  • Inga Laß
  • Esperanza Vera-Toscano
  • Trong-Anh Trinh
  • Peter Butterworth

Best Publications

  • The Effects of Wealth and Income on Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being

    Bruce Headey;Mark Wooden

  • The HILDA Survey: a case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study

    Nicole Watson;Mark Peter Wooden

  • Life satisfaction and the economic and social characteristics of neighbourhoods

    Michael A. Shields;Stephen Wheatley Price;Mark Wooden

  • Money Does not Buy Happiness: Or Does It? A Reassessment Based on the Combined Effects of Wealth, Income and Consumption

    Bruce Headey;Ruud Muffels;Mark Wooden

  • The Determinants of Labor Absence: Economic Factors and Workgroup Norms across Countries:

    Robert Drago;Mark Wooden

  • Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response

    Nicole Watson;Mark Wooden

  • Working Time Mismatch and Subjective Well‐being

    Mark Wooden;Diana Warren;Robert Drago

  • The HILDA Survey and its Contribution to Economic and Social Research (So Far)

    Mark Wooden;Nicole Watson

  • The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA)Survey: Wave 1

    Mark Wooden;Simon Freidin;Nicole Watson

  • The Cross-National Equivalent File (CNEF) and its member country household panel studies

    Joachim R. Frick;Stephen P. Jenkins;Dean R. Lillard;Oliver Lipps

  • Mental Health and Productivity at Work: Does What You Do Matter?

    Melisa Bubonya;Deborah A. Cobb-Clark;Mark Wooden

  • Overskilling, Job Insecurity, and Career Mobility

    Seamus McGUINNESS;Mark Wooden

  • What's the good of education on our overall quality of life?: a simultaneous equation model of education and life satisfaction for Australia

    Nattavudh Powdthavee;Warn N. Lekfuangfu;Mark Wooden

  • The transformation of Australian industrial relations

    Mark Wooden;Robert W. Drago;Anne Hawke

  • The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey

    Nicole Watson;Mark Wooden

  • Non-Standard Employment and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from the Hilda Survey

    Mark Wooden;Diana Warren

  • Australian immigration: a survey of the issues.

    Wooden M;Holton R;Hugo G;Sloan J

  • Do Explanations of Absenteeism Differ for Men and Women

    Audrey VandenHeuvel;Mark Wooden

  • Female breadwinner families: their existence, persistence and sources

    Robert William Drago;David Black;Mark Wooden

  • The Structure and Distribution of Household Wealth in Australia

    Bruce Headey;Gary Marks;Mark Wooden

  • Life satisfaction and sexual minorities: evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom

    Nattavudh Powdthavee;Mark Wooden

  • The 1995 Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey

    Anne Hawke;Mark Wooden

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce Headey
Bruce Headey University of Melbourne
Gary N. Marks
Gary N. Marks University of Melbourne
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark University of Sydney
Nattavudh Powdthavee
Nattavudh Powdthavee University of Warwick
Seamus McGuinness
Seamus McGuinness Economic and Social Research Institute
Daniel S. Hamermesh
Daniel S. Hamermesh The University of Texas at Austin
Peter Butterworth
Peter Butterworth Australian National University
Michael A. Shields
Michael A. Shields Monash University
Stephen P. Jenkins
Stephen P. Jenkins London School of Economics and Political Science
Robert A. Cummins
Robert A. Cummins Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degree and career options. Aspiring professionals often seek flexible programs that balance affordability, quality, and career relevance.

Many students are drawn to the best online mba no gmat programs, which eliminate standardized test requirements and make the application process more accessible. For those mindful of cost, choosing an online mba under 40k can deliver a high-value education without the heavy financial burden.

Broader career pathways are also available. For example, a social media marketing studies degree is ideal for those who want to blend finance or economics expertise with digital marketing skills. If you’re interested in the business side of hospitality, consider a hospitality management degree online for fast-tracked entry into a thriving industry.

These online degrees make it easier than ever to customize your learning experience and unlock new career possibilities in today’s dynamic economy.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wooden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles