World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Deborah Schofield

Deborah Schofield

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
40
Citations
6970
World Ranking
2298
National Ranking
58

Deborah Schofield publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Schofield sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 160 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Deborah Schofield D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Schofield sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah Schofield is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and related fields. Their work spans multiple disciplines, including medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The primary fields of study for Schofield consist of:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields of particular focus include:

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Genetics
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology

The main topics covered in their work incorporate:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Their recent publications include:

  • "Whole exome and genome sequencing in mendelian disorders: a diagnostic and health economic analysis," 2022, European Journal of Human Genetics
  • "Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mitochondrial Disease Diagnosis," 2022, Neurology
  • "Financial toxicity of childhood cancer and changes to parents' employment after treatment completion," 2020, Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • "The effect of lactoferrin supplementation on death or major morbidity in very low birthweight infants (LIFT): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial," 2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • "Estimating the costs of genomic sequencing in cancer control," 2020, BMC Health Services Research

Schofield frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Pain
  • European Journal of Human Genetics
  • Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Value in Health

Key coauthors who frequently collaborate with Schofield include:

  • Rupendra Shrestha
  • Carolyn M. Sue
  • Evelyn Lee
  • Owen Tan
  • Tony Roscioli

Best Publications

  • The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis

    David J. Hunter;Deborah Schofield;Emily Callander

  • The health consequences of unemployment : the evidence

    Colin D Mathers;Deborah J Schofield

  • Diagnostic Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Ambulant Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions

    Tiong Yang Tan;Oliver James Dillon;Zornitza Stark;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield

  • Prospective comparison of the cost-effectiveness of clinical whole-exome sequencing with that of usual care overwhelmingly supports early use and reimbursement

    Zornitza Stark;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Khurshid Alam;William Wilson

  • Chronic disease and labour force participation among older Australians.

    Deborah J Schofield;Rupendra N Shrestha;Megan E Passey;Arul Earnest

  • Whole-exome sequencing reanalysis at 12 months boosts diagnosis and is cost-effective when applied early in Mendelian disorders

    Lisa J Ewans;Lisa J Ewans;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Rupendra Shrestha;Ying Zhu

  • Does genomic sequencing early in the diagnostic trajectory make a difference? A follow-up study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

    Zornitza Stark;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Melissa Martyn;Luke Rynehart

  • Baby boomer doctors and nurses : demographic change and transitions to retirement

    Deborah J Schofield;John R Beard

  • Access to general practitioner services amongst underserved Australians: a microsimulation study

    Deborah J Schofield;Rupendra N Shrestha;Emily J Callander

  • Demographic change and the future demand for public hospital care in Australia, 2005 to 2050.

    Deborah J Schofield;Arul Earnest

  • An introduction to STINMOD: a static microsimulation model

    Simon Lambert;Richard Percival;Deborah Schofield;Susan Paul

  • Integrating exome sequencing into a diagnostic pathway for epileptic encephalopathy: Evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness.

    Elizabeth E. Palmer;Deborah Schofield;Deborah Schofield;Rupendra Shrestha;Tejaswi Kandula;Tejaswi Kandula

  • The personal and national costs of mental health conditions: impacts on income, taxes, government support payments due to lost labour force participation

    Deborah J Schofield;Rupendra N Shrestha;Richard Percival;Megan E Passey

  • Application of next-generation sequencing to improve cancer management: A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

    O. Tan;O. Tan;R. Shrestha;R. Shrestha;M. Cunich;D.J. Schofield;D.J. Schofield

  • Cost-effectiveness of massively parallel sequencing for diagnosis of paediatric muscle diseases.

    Deborah Schofield;Khurshid Alam;Lyndal Douglas;Rupendra Shrestha

  • INCOME INEQUALITY IN AUSTRALIA: THE IMPACT OF NON-CASH SUBSIDIES FOR HEALTH AND HOUSING

    John Landt;Richard Percival;Deborah Schofield;David Wilson

  • Modelling Australian public health expenditure

    Richard Percival;Deborah Schofield

  • The personal and national costs of lost labour force participation due to arthritis: an economic study

    Deborah J Schofield;Rupendra N Shrestha;Richard Percival;Megan E Passey

  • Long-term economic impacts of exome sequencing for suspected monogenic disorders: diagnosis, management, and reproductive outcomes.

    Deborah Schofield;Luke Rynehart;Rupendra Shresthra;Susan M. White

  • Towards a holistic understanding of poverty: a new multidimensional measure of poverty for Australia

    Emily Joy Callander;Deborah J Schofield;Rupendra N Shrestha

  • Models and tools for health workforce planning and projections

    Mario R. Dal Poz;Norbert Dreesch;Susan Fletcher;Gulin Gedik

  • A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment, relative to standard care—an international randomised controlled trial

    N R Fuller;S Colagiuri;D Schofield;A D Olson

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony Roscioli
Tony Roscioli University of New South Wales
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Melanie J. B. Zeppel
Melanie J. B. Zeppel Macquarie University
Khurshid Alam
Khurshid Alam Murdoch University
John S. Mattick
John S. Mattick University of New South Wales
Zornitza Stark
Zornitza Stark University of Melbourne
David Mowat
David Mowat University of New South Wales
Stephen Colagiuri
Stephen Colagiuri University of Sydney
Rana S. Hinman
Rana S. Hinman University of Melbourne
Kim L. Bennell
Kim L. Bennell University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can be a flexible and faster way to build expertise in economics and finance. Many students consider an accelerated bachelor's degree in finance for a fast track into investment, banking, or corporate finance roles. These programs can often be completed in less time than traditional pathways, which means you can enter the workforce sooner.

Those looking for advancement might pursue a 6 month mba program. This degree can open doors to leadership opportunities in business, consulting, or financial management. Shortened MBA programs combine comprehensive business training with time efficiency for working professionals.

For specialized skills, many entry-level candidates start with the best bookkeeping courses. These certificates help develop practical knowledge of accounting and financial reporting, highly valued by employers.

If you are interested in leadership and organizational roles, there are excellent opportunities for jobs with project management degree backgrounds. Project management skills are critical in financial sectors for overseeing budgets, timelines, and team coordination.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah Schofield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles