World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 90 1069 1010 515 482 261 34691

Stephen F. Kingsmore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen F. Kingsmore between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen F. Kingsmore published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2023. 38 of the 338 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2023. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 15 publications
1988 2025

338 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen F. Kingsmore: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 7
1990 3
1991 0
1992 1
1993 7
1994 7
1995 6
1996 5
1997 6
1998 4
1999 3
2000 5
2001 9
2002 6
2003 9
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 1
2008 8
2009 6
2010 13
2011 8
2012 16
2013 15
2014 10
2015 22
2016 8
2017 8
2018 17
2019 12
2020 11
2021 18
2022 12
2023 25
2024 23
2025 15
Total 338
Download as CSV

Stephen F. Kingsmore publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Kingsmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 255–264 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 261 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92 261
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen F. Kingsmore D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Kingsmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66 90
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen F. Kingsmore is affiliated with Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus also on Medicine. Within these broad fields, their work is deeply engaged with Genetics, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Cancer Research, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their research topics prominently cover areas such as Genomics and Rare Diseases, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, Metabolism and Genetic Disorders, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Congenital heart defects research, and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stephen F. Kingsmore include David Dimmock, Erica Sanford Kobayashi, Charlotte A. Hobbs, Yan Ding, and Shimul Chowdhury.

They have contributed to several journals and publication venues, appearing most frequently in UNC Libraries, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), npj Genomic Medicine, The American Journal of Human Genetics, and Genetics in Medicine.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Project Baby Bear: Rapid precision care incorporating rWGS in 5 California children's hospitals demonstrates improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs of care, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • An RCT of Rapid Genomic Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants Results in High Clinical Utility, Changes in Management, and Low Perceived Harm, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases, 2022, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Artificial intelligence enables comprehensive genome interpretation and nomination of candidate diagnoses for rare genetic diseases, 2021, Genome Medicine
  • The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change, 2023, Genetics in Medicine

Best Publications

  • Alternative Isoform Regulation in Human Tissue Transcriptomes

    Eric T. Wang;Rickard Sandberg;Rickard Sandberg;Shujun Luo;Irina Khrebtukova

  • Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification

    Frank B. Dean;Seiyu Hosono;Linhua Fang;Xiaohong Wu

  • Multiplexed protein measurement: technologies and applications of protein and antibody arrays

    Stephen F. Kingsmore

  • Carrier Testing for Severe Childhood Recessive Diseases by Next-Generation Sequencing

    Callum J. Bell;Darrell L. Dinwiddie;Darrell L. Dinwiddie;Neil A. Miller;Neil A. Miller;Shannon L. Hateley

  • Immunoassays with rolling circle DNA amplification: a versatile platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection.

    Barry Schweitzer;Steven Wiltshire;Jeremy Lambert;Shawn O'Malley

  • Multiplexed protein profiling on microarrays by rolling-circle amplification

    Barry Schweitzer;Scott Roberts;Brian Grimwade;Weiping Shao

  • Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing for Genetic Disease Diagnosis in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

    Carol Jean Saunders;Neil Andrew Miller;Neil Andrew Miller;Sarah Elizabeth Soden;Sarah Elizabeth Soden;Darrell Lee Dinwiddie

  • Identification of the homologous beige and Chediak–Higashi syndrome genes

    Maria D. F. S. Barbosa;Quan A. Nguyen;Velizar T. Tchernev;Jennifer A. Ashley

  • Early-onset lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity caused by germline STAT3 gain-of-function mutations

    Joshua D. Milner;Tiphanie P. Vogel;Lisa Forbes;Chi A. Ma

  • Unbiased Whole-Genome Amplification Directly From Clinical Samples

    Seiyu Hosono;A. Fawad Faruqi;Frank B. Dean;Yuefen Du

  • Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis.

    Sergio E. Baranzini;Joann Mudge;Jennifer C. Van Velkinburgh;Pouya Khankhanian

  • An Integrated Clinico-Metabolomic Model Improves Prediction of Death in Sepsis

    Raymond J. Langley;Raymond J. Langley;Ephraim L. Tsalik;Ephraim L. Tsalik;Jennifer C. Van Velkinburgh;Seth W. Glickman;Seth W. Glickman

  • Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders

    Sarah E. Soden;Sarah E. Soden;Carol J. Saunders;Laurel K. Willig;Laurel K. Willig;Emily G. Farrow

  • Meta-analysis of the diagnostic and clinical utility of genome and exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with suspected genetic diseases

    Michelle M. Clark;Zornitza Stark;Lauge Farnaes;Lauge Farnaes;Tiong Y. Tan

  • Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 7 (HPS-7) results from mutant dysbindin, a member of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1).

    Wei Li;Qing Zhang;Naoki Oiso;Edward K Novak

  • Gene Expression Signatures Diagnose Influenza and Other Symptomatic Respiratory Viral Infections in Humans

    Aimee K. Zaas;Minhua Chen;Jay Varkey;Timothy Veldman

  • A highly annotated whole-genome sequence of a Korean individual

    Jong-Il Kim;Young Seok Ju;Hansoo Park;Sheehyun Kim

  • Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings

    Laurel K Willig;Laurel K Willig;Josh E Petrikin;Josh E Petrikin;Laurie D Smith;Laurie D Smith;Carol J Saunders;Carol J Saunders

  • Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization.

    Lauge Farnaes;Lauge Farnaes;Amber Hildreth;Amber Hildreth;Nathaly M. Sweeney;Nathaly M. Sweeney;Michelle M. Clark

  • Genome-Wide Association Studies: Progress in Identifying Genetic Biomarkers in Common, Complex Diseases

    Stephen F. Kingsmore;Ingrid E. Lindquist;Joann Mudge;William D. Beavis

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher W. Woods
Christopher W. Woods Duke University
Mikko Hallman
Mikko Hallman Oulu University Hospital
Vance G. Fowler
Vance G. Fowler Duke University
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
Geoffrey S. Ginsburg Duke University
Joann Mudge
Joann Mudge National Center for Genome Resources
Dhavalkumar D. Patel
Dhavalkumar D. Patel University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Marc G. Caron
Marc G. Caron Duke University
Gary P. Schroth
Gary P. Schroth Illumina (United States)
Lawrence Carin
Lawrence Carin Duke University
Shujun Luo
Shujun Luo Predicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Genetics opens doors to varied career pathways in healthcare, research, and allied professions. For those interested in building foundational knowledge while maintaining flexibility, there are affordable medical billing and coding programs available online. These programs are ideal for starting a healthcare career or gaining essential skills for genetics-related administrative work.

If you’re drawn to patient care, investigate easy to get into nursing programs. These programs often offer accessible admission requirements and are a practical step toward blending hands-on healthcare with genetic knowledge.

For those targeting leadership or administrative roles, consider a healthcare administration degree online accredited by relevant authorities. This path prepares you for management positions in hospitals, research institutions, and biotechnology companies.

Cost is a key factor for many students. You can find a health care administration online degree that balances quality with affordability, helping you advance your career in genetics and healthcare without taking on unnecessary debt.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen F. Kingsmore

Trending Scientists