World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
16128
World Ranking
7031
National Ranking
3029

John C. Mosher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Mosher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 149 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John C. Mosher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Mosher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Mosher is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and works in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their research focuses on multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Signal Processing.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics such as Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Epilepsy Research and Treatment, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Blind Source Separation Techniques, and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by John C. Mosher include the following:

  • A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction (2021) published in NeuroImage
  • Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization (2020) published in NeuroImage
  • Good scientific practice in EEG and MEG research: Progress and perspectives (2022) published in NeuroImage
  • Practical Fundamentals of Clinical MEG Interpretation in Epilepsy (2021) published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • The Listening Zone of Human Electrocorticographic Field Potential Recordings (2022) published in eNeuro

Frequent co-authors working alongside John C. Mosher include:

  • Michael Funke
  • Dimitrios Pantazis
  • Richard M. Leahy
  • Anand A. Joshi
  • Fernando Maestú

Publications are often found in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Epilepsia
  • NeuroImage
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Best Publications

  • Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis

    François Tadel;Sylvain Baillet;John C. Mosher;Dimitrios Pantazis

  • Electromagnetic brain mapping

    S. Baillet;J.C. Mosher;R.M. Leahy

  • EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods

    J.C. Mosher;R.M. Leahy;P.S. Lewis

  • A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG.

    M X Huang;J C Mosher;R M Leahy

  • A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom

    R.M. Leahy;J.C. Mosher;M.E. Spencer;M.X. Huang

  • Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization

    John C. Mosher;John C. Mosher;Michael E. Spencer;Michael E. Spencer;Michael E. Spencer;Richard M. Leahy;Paul S. Lewis

  • Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    J S George;C J Aine;J C Mosher;D M Schmidt

  • Ripple classification helps to localize the seizure-onset zone in neocortical epilepsy.

    Shuang Wang;Shuang Wang;Irene Z. Wang;Juan C. Bulacio;John C. Mosher

  • MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources

    J.W. Phillips;R.M. Leahy;J.C. Mosher

  • A fingerprint of the epileptogenic zone in human epilepsies

    Olesya Grinenko;Jian Li;John C Mosher;Irene Z Wang

  • MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm.

    François Tadel;Elizabeth Bock;Guiomar Niso;Guiomar Niso;John C. Mosher

  • Microtesla MRI of the human brain combined with MEG

    Vadim S. Zotev;Andrei N. Matlashov;Petr L. Volegov;Igor M. Savukov

  • EEG SOURCE LOCALIZATION AND IMAGING USING MULTIPLE SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION APPROACHES

    John C. Mosher;Sylvain Baillet;Richard M. Leahy

  • A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction

    Unknown

  • Correlating magnetoencephalography to stereo-electroencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery

    Hiroatsu Murakami;Hiroatsu Murakami;Zhong I. Wang;Ahmad Marashly;Balu Krishnan

  • On MEG forward modelling using multipolar expansions.

    K Jerbi;J C Mosher;S Baillet;R M Leahy

  • Automated interictal spike detection and source localization in magnetoencephalography using independent components analysis and spatio-temporal clustering.

    A. Ossadtchi;S. Baillet;J.C. Mosher;D. Thyerlei

  • In vivo human hippocampal cingulate connectivity: A corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) study

    Yuichi Kubota;Rei Enatsu;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Juan Bulacio

  • Time-Frequency Strategies for Increasing High-Frequency Oscillation Detectability in Intracerebral EEG

    Nicolas Roehri;Jean-Marc Lina;John C. Mosher;Fabrice Bartolomei

  • Imaging neural activity using MEG and EEG

    J.W. Phillips;R.M. Leahy;J.C. Mosher;B. Timsari

  • Generic head models for atlas‐based EEG source analysis

    Felix Darvas;John J. Ermer;John C. Mosher;Richard M. Leahy

  • Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles

    Karim Jerbi;Sylvain Baillet;John C. Mosher;G. Nolte

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Leahy
Richard M. Leahy University of Southern California
Richard C. Burgess
Richard C. Burgess Case Western Reserve University
Andreas V. Alexopoulos
Andreas V. Alexopoulos Cleveland Clinic
Sylvain Baillet
Sylvain Baillet McGill University
Dileep Nair
Dileep Nair Cleveland Clinic
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez Cleveland Clinic
Juan Bulacio
Juan Bulacio Cleveland Clinic
Imad Najm
Imad Najm Cleveland Clinic
Mingxiong Huang
Mingxiong Huang University of California, San Diego
Karim Jerbi
Karim Jerbi University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a wide range of related fields, especially in the mental health and behavioral sciences sectors. For those interested in applying neuroscience knowledge to help others, exploring graduate online programs in counseling, family therapy, and psychology can be a smart next step.

An important consideration when selecting a program is accreditation. Prospective students should look into cacrep accredited counseling programs, which ensure high educational standards and may be required for certain professional licenses.

Cost is often a key factor for many students. For those seeking cost-effective options, you may want to consider the cheapest master's in counseling online or explore the cheapest online master's degree in psychology to maximize value without sacrificing quality.

Additionally, those interested in supporting families may want to review accredited marriage and family masters programs. These related degrees can help neuroscience majors expand their career options, equipping them for diverse roles in therapy, research, and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Mosher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles