World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8984 8298 3802 3442 109 5826

Juan Bulacio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juan Bulacio between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juan Bulacio published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 17 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 6 publications
1998 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juan Bulacio: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 1
2011 1
2012 4
2013 8
2014 12
2015 3
2016 11
2017 10
2018 9
2019 12
2020 4
2021 6
2022 7
2023 4
2024 11
2025 6
Total 118
Download as CSV

Juan Bulacio publications per year - data summary

  • Juan Bulacio, a Neuroscience scholar from Cleveland Clinic, has 118 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2014 and 2019, with 12 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 1999, 2003, 2004 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 28 years in the span carry no publications at all (2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.4 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 34 publications, 29% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 9 publications (0.9 per year); 2008-2017: 50 publications (5.0 per year); 2018-2025: 59 publications (7.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Juan Bulacio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Bulacio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 109 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 109
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Juan Bulacio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Juan Bulacio, a Neuroscience scholar from Cleveland Clinic, records 109 publications - the 22nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 22% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Juan Bulacio, and about 78% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Juan Bulacio ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Juan Bulacio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Bulacio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Juan Bulacio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Juan Bulacio, a Neuroscience scholar from Cleveland Clinic, records 36 D-Index - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Juan Bulacio, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Juan Bulacio ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Juan Bulacio is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their research portfolio spans 46 publications in medicine and 39 in neuroscience, with a particular focus on epilepsy research and treatment, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and neurological disorders and treatments.

Bulacio's work addresses various subfields, including psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the diversity of topics the scientist investigates, such as functional brain connectivity studies, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, and cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus.

Their recent publications include:

  • Neural fragility as an EEG marker of the seizure onset zone, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Multimodal Image Integration for Epilepsy Presurgical Evaluation: A Clinical Workflow, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Outcomes of resections that spare vs remove an MRI-normal hippocampus, 2020, Epilepsia
  • Determinants of seizure outcome after resective surgery following stereoelectroencephalography, 2021, Journal of Neurosurgery
  • Effective connectivity differs between focal cortical dysplasia types I and II, 2021, Epilepsia

Bulacio frequently collaborates with several researchers, including William Bingaman, Imad Najm, Andreas V. Alexopoulos, Demitre Serletis, and Lara Jehi, highlighting a collaborative research network focused on neurological disorders and surgical outcomes. The scientist has published multiple papers in prominent venues such as Operative Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurophysiology, Nature Neuroscience, and Epilepsia, which collectively represent the dissemination of clinical and experimental neurology research across reputable platforms.

The range of topics addressed by Bulacio's research covers:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Pharmacological effects and toxicity studies

Overall, Bulacio's research integrates clinical neurology with advanced neurophysiological and neuroimaging techniques, emphasizing surgical outcomes and neural connectivity. Their contributions span across clinical and translational neuroscience, particularly focusing on epilepsy and brain mapping methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents

    Elaine Wyllie;Youssef G. Comair;Prakash Kotagal;Juan Bulacio

  • Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography–related complications

    Jeffrey P. Mullin;Michael Shriver;Soha Alomar;Imad Najm

  • Technique, Results, and Complications Related to Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography.

    Jorge González-Martínez;Juan Bulacio;Susan Thompson;John Gale

  • Stereoelectroencephalography in the "difficult to localize" refractory focal epilepsy: early experience from a North American epilepsy center.

    Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Juan Bulacio;Andreas Alexopoulos;Lara Jehi

  • Predictors of outcome after temporal lobectomy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy

    L. E. Jeha;I. M. Najm;W. E. Bingaman;F. Khandwala

  • Temporal lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis in pediatric candidates for epilepsy surgery

    A. Mohamed;Elaine Wyllie;P. Ruggieri;P. Kotagal

  • Ripple classification helps to localize the seizure-onset zone in neocortical epilepsy.

    Shuang Wang;Shuang Wang;Irene Z. Wang;Juan C. Bulacio;John C. Mosher

  • Mental Retardation in Pediatric Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: The Role of Early Seizure Onset

    Elza Vasconcellos;Elaine Wyllie;Shawn Sullivan;Lisa Stanford

  • Stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in medically intractable epilepsy

    Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Jeffrey Mullin;Sumeet Vadera;Juan Bulacio

  • A fingerprint of the epileptogenic zone in human epilepsies

    Olesya Grinenko;Jian Li;John C Mosher;Irene Z Wang

  • Long-term seizure outcome after resective surgery in patients evaluated with intracranial electrodes.

    Juan C. Bulacio;Lara Jehi;Chong Wong;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez

  • The stereotactic approach for mapping epileptic networks: a prospective study of 200 patients

    Demitre Serletis;Juan Bulacio;William Bingaman;Imad Najm

  • Neural fragility as an EEG marker of the seizure onset zone.

    Adam Li;Chester Huynh;Zachary Fitzgerald;Iahn Cajigas

  • Correlating magnetoencephalography to stereo-electroencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery

    Hiroatsu Murakami;Hiroatsu Murakami;Zhong I. Wang;Ahmad Marashly;Balu Krishnan

  • In vivo human hippocampal cingulate connectivity: A corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) study

    Yuichi Kubota;Rei Enatsu;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Juan Bulacio

  • Connections of the limbic network: a corticocortical evoked potentials study.

    Rei Enatsu;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Juan Bulacio;Yuichi Kubota

  • Stereoelectroencephalography in children and adolescents with difficult-to-localize refractory focal epilepsy.

    Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Jeffrey Mullin;Juan Bulacio;Ajay Gupta

  • Stereoelectroencephalography Following Subdural Grid Placement for Difficult to Localize Epilepsy

    Sumeet Vadera;Jeffrey Mullin;Juan Bulacio;Imad Najm

  • Risk analysis of hemorrhage in stereo‐electroencephalography procedures

    Robert A. McGovern;Robert A. McGovern;Paul Ruggieri;Juan Bulacio;Imad Najm

  • Cortical negative motor network in comparison with sensorimotor network: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study.

    Rei Enatsu;Riki Matsumoto;Zhe Piao;Timothy O'Connor

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez Cleveland Clinic
Imad Najm
Imad Najm Cleveland Clinic
William Bingaman
William Bingaman Cleveland Clinic
Dileep Nair
Dileep Nair Cleveland Clinic
Andreas V. Alexopoulos
Andreas V. Alexopoulos Cleveland Clinic
Lara Jehi
Lara Jehi Cleveland Clinic
John C. Mosher
John C. Mosher Cleveland Clinic
Richard C. Burgess
Richard C. Burgess Case Western Reserve University
Nathan E. Crone
Nathan E. Crone Johns Hopkins University
Patrick Chauvel
Patrick Chauvel University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering Neuroscience, exploring related online degrees can significantly broaden your career opportunities. Many students opt for accelerated degree programs to graduate faster and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are excellent for motivated learners ready to jumpstart their careers in healthcare, research, or even tech.

Choosing a degree that opens high-earning doors is also a smart move. According to recent data, majoring in STEM fields often leads to some of the best degree in the world options. Neuroscience combines biology, psychology, and data analysis, which aligns with many highest paid college majors.

Cost is another important factor. There are cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa, making quality education more accessible. With a flexible online format and financial aid options, pursuing neuroscience or a related degree is now more achievable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Juan Bulacio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles