World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William Bingaman

William Bingaman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 77 1865 1701 893 795 276 18212

William Bingaman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William Bingaman between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William Bingaman published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2012. 17 of the 309 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2012. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications
1995 2025

309 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William Bingaman: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 5
1999 9
2000 9
2001 7
2002 10
2003 7
2004 15
2005 11
2006 12
2007 11
2008 10
2009 7
2010 11
2011 9
2012 17
2013 17
2014 15
2015 16
2016 11
2017 3
2018 10
2019 11
2020 14
2021 17
2022 16
2023 10
2024 10
2025 7
Total 309
Download as CSV

William Bingaman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Bingaman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 268–277 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 276 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175 276
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

William Bingaman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Bingaman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170 77
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

William Bingaman is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics in medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on epilepsy research and treatment, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, and cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus. Their work also encompasses neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, and neurological disorders and treatments.

They have contributed to 137 publications in the broader field of medicine and 51 publications in neuroscience. Among subfields, their research includes psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology.

Frequent publication venues for Bingaman's work reflect a concentration in epilepsy and neurological disciplines, including:

  • Epilepsia
  • Neurology
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Neurosurgery
  • Operative Neurosurgery

Co-authorship collaborations are notable with researchers such as:

  • Lara Jehi
  • Imad Najm
  • Juan Bulacio
  • Demitre Serletis
  • Richard Rammo

Selected recent publications illustrate the focus on epilepsy surgery and diagnostic imaging techniques. These include:

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Versus Subdural Grids in Epilepsy Surgery, 2021, Annals of Neurology
  • Value of 7T MRI and post-processing in patients with nonlesional 3T MRI undergoing epilepsy presurgical evaluation, 2020, Epilepsia
  • Long-term outcomes of reoperations in epilepsy surgery, 2020, Epilepsia
  • Improving the prediction of epilepsy surgery outcomes using basic scalp EEG findings, 2021, Epilepsia
  • Epilepsy surgery in infants up to 3 months of age: Safety, feasibility, and outcomes: A multicenter, multinational study, 2021, Epilepsia

Best Publications

  • Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study.

    Riki Matsumoto;Dileep R. Nair;Eric LaPresto;Imad Najm

  • Seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents

    Elaine Wyllie;Youssef G. Comair;Prakash Kotagal;Juan Bulacio

  • Overexpression of Multiple Drug Resistance Genes in Endothelial Cells from Patients with Refractory Epilepsy

    Stephen M. Dombrowski;Shailesh Y. Desai;Matteo Marroni;Luca Cucullo

  • Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery

    Lara E. Jeha;Imad Najm;William Bingaman;Dudley Dinner

  • Functional connectivity in human cortical motor system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study.

    Riki Matsumoto;Dileep R. Nair;Eric LaPresto;William Bingaman

  • Complications of invasive video-EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes.

    H.M. Hamer;H.H. Morris;E.J. Mascha;M.T. Karafa

  • The localizing value of ictal EEG in focal epilepsy

    N. Foldvary;G. Klem;J. Hammel;W. Bingaman

  • Successful surgery for epilepsy due to early brain lesions despite generalized EEG findings

    E. Wyllie;D. K. Lachhwani;A. Gupta;A. Chirla

  • Technique, Results, and Complications Related to Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography.

    Jorge González-Martínez;Juan Bulacio;Susan Thompson;John Gale

  • Developmental outcome after epilepsy surgery in infancy.

    Tobias Loddenkemper;Katherine D. Holland;Lisa D. Stanford;Prakash Kotagal

  • Stereoelectroencephalography in the "difficult to localize" refractory focal epilepsy: early experience from a North American epilepsy center.

    Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Juan Bulacio;Andreas Alexopoulos;Lara Jehi

  • Predictors of outcome after temporal lobectomy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy

    L. E. Jeha;I. M. Najm;W. E. Bingaman;F. Khandwala

  • Temporal lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis in pediatric candidates for epilepsy surgery

    A. Mohamed;Elaine Wyllie;P. Ruggieri;P. Kotagal

  • Development and validation of nomograms to provide individualised predictions of seizure outcomes after epilepsy surgery: a retrospective analysis.

    Lara Jehi;Ruta Yardi;Kevin Chagin;Laura Tassi

  • Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Administration on Pain, Opioid Consumption, and Quality of Life after Complex Spine Surgery

    Ehab Farag;Michael Ghobrial;Daniel I. Sessler;Jarrod E. Dalton

  • Seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in patients with normal preoperative MRI

    K. Chapman;Elaine Wyllie;Imad Najm;P. Ruggieri

  • Mental Retardation in Pediatric Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: The Role of Early Seizure Onset

    Elza Vasconcellos;Elaine Wyllie;Shawn Sullivan;Lisa Stanford

  • Epileptogenicity of Focal Malformations Due to Abnormal Cortical Development: Direct Electrocorticographic–Histopathologic Correlations

    Kanokwan Boonyapisit;Imad Najm;George Klem;Zhong Ying

  • Long-term results with vagus nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy

    Andreas V. Alexopoulos;Prakash Kotagal;Tobias Loddenkemper;Jeffrey Hammel

  • Temporal patterns and mechanisms of epilepsy surgery failure

    Imad Najm;Lara Jehi;Andre Palmini;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez

Frequent Co-Authors

Imad Najm
Imad Najm Cleveland Clinic
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez Cleveland Clinic
Lara Jehi
Lara Jehi Cleveland Clinic
Elaine Wyllie
Elaine Wyllie Cleveland Clinic
Dileep Nair
Dileep Nair Cleveland Clinic
Prakash Kotagal
Prakash Kotagal Cleveland Clinic
Juan Bulacio
Juan Bulacio Cleveland Clinic
Hans Lüders
Hans Lüders Case Western Reserve University
Andreas V. Alexopoulos
Andreas V. Alexopoulos Cleveland Clinic
Richard C. Burgess
Richard C. Burgess Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, a variety of online degrees can complement your path, offer flexibility, and open new professional possibilities. Fields like psychology and social work share key foundations with neuroscience, and the demand for hands-on experience and advanced credentials is growing.

For students interested in mental health and community work, exploring the most affordable online msw programs is a great way to earn a respected qualification without excessive debt. If you want a faster route to clinical practice, there are also accelerated msw programs designed to help you graduate and enter the workforce quickly.

Those drawn to behavior analysis may be interested in the cheapest bcba online program, which prepares students to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts—a role often intersecting with neuroscience in research and therapy.

Finally, to jumpstart your career in psychology, consider an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology. These programs provide a fast-track to foundational knowledge and professional opportunities that can intersect with neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing William Bingaman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles