World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
9701
World Ranking
6858
National Ranking
2962

Dileep Nair publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dileep Nair sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Dileep Nair D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dileep Nair sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dileep Nair is a researcher affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Epilepsy research and treatment, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Neurological disorders and treatments, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy (2020), published in Neurology
  • Mesial temporal resection following long-term ambulatory intracranial EEG monitoring with a direct brain-responsive neurostimulation system (2020), published in Epilepsia
  • Evidence of a Rapid Shift in Outpatient Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Telemedicine (2020), published in Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
  • Continuous electroencephalography characteristics and acute symptomatic seizures in COVID-19 patients (2020), published in Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Improving the prediction of epilepsy surgery outcomes using basic scalp EEG findings (2021), published in Epilepsia

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Nair has co-authored works with colleagues including Richard M. Leahy, Andreas V. Alexopoulos, Vineet Punia, Anand A. Joshi, and Imad Najm. The frequency of these collaborations ranges from seven to ten joint works.

Their research outputs are often published in established venues such as Epilepsia, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Epilepsia Open, Neurology, and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Best Publications

  • Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study.

    Riki Matsumoto;Dileep R. Nair;Eric LaPresto;Imad Najm

  • Two‐year seizure reduction in adults with medically intractable partial onset epilepsy treated with responsive neurostimulation: Final results of the RNS System Pivotal trial

    Christianne N. Heck;David King-Stephens;Andrew D. Massey;Dileep R. Nair

  • Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures

    Gregory K. Bergey;Martha J. Morrell;Eli M. Mizrahi;Alica Goldman

  • Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy

    Unknown

  • The epileptogenic zone: general principles

    Hans O Lüders;Imad Najm;Dileep Nair;Peter Widdess-Walsh

  • Functional connectivity in human cortical motor system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study.

    Riki Matsumoto;Dileep R. Nair;Eric LaPresto;William Bingaman

  • Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Eric B. Geller;Tara L. Skarpaas;Robert E. Gross;Robert R. Goodman

  • Chronic Enhancement of the Intrinsic Growth Capacity of Sensory Neurons Combined with the Degradation of Inhibitory Proteoglycans Allows Functional Regeneration of Sensory Axons through the Dorsal Root Entry Zone in the Mammalian Spinal Cord

    Michael P. Steinmetz;Kevin P. Horn;Veronica J. Tom;Veronica J. Tom;Jared H. Miller

  • Predictors of outcome after temporal lobectomy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy

    L. E. Jeha;I. M. Najm;W. E. Bingaman;F. Khandwala

  • Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable seizures arising from eloquent and other neocortical areas.

    Barbara C. Jobst;Ritu Kapur;Gregory L. Barkley;Carl W. Bazil

  • Epileptogenicity of Focal Malformations Due to Abnormal Cortical Development: Direct Electrocorticographic–Histopathologic Correlations

    Kanokwan Boonyapisit;Imad Najm;George Klem;Zhong Ying

  • A fingerprint of the epileptogenic zone in human epilepsies

    Olesya Grinenko;Jian Li;John C Mosher;Irene Z Wang

  • Long-term seizure outcome after resective surgery in patients evaluated with intracranial electrodes.

    Juan C. Bulacio;Lara Jehi;Chong Wong;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez

  • Single pulse electrical stimulation to probe functional and pathological connectivity in epilepsy.

    Riki Matsumoto;Takeharu Kunieda;Dileep Nair

  • Focal cortical dysplasias in eloquent cortex : functional characteristics and correlation with MRI and histopathologic changes

    Petr Marusic;Imad M. Najm;Zhong Ying;Richard Prayson

  • Lateralization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with chronic ambulatory electrocorticography

    David King-Stephens;Emily Mirro;Peter B. Weber;Kenneth D. Laxer

  • Subdural electrode analysis in focal cortical dysplasia Predictors of surgical outcome

    P. Widdess-Walsh;L. Jeha;D. Nair;P. Kotagal

  • Parieto-frontal network in humans studied by cortico-cortical evoked potential.

    Riki Matsumoto;Dileep R. Nair;Akio Ikeda;Tomoyuki Fumuro

  • Chronic subdural electrodes in the management of epilepsy

    Dileep R. Nair;Richard Burgess;Cameron C. McIntyre;Hans Lüders

  • In vivo human hippocampal cingulate connectivity: A corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) study

    Yuichi Kubota;Rei Enatsu;Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez;Juan Bulacio

  • EEG and evoked potential recording from the subthalamic nucleus for deep brain stimulation of intractable epilepsy

    Dudley S Dinner;Silvia Neme;Dileep Nair;Erwin B Montgomery

  • Long-termtreatmentwithresponsivebrain stimulationinadultswithrefractorypartial seizures

    Gregory K. Bergey;Martha J. Morrell;Eli M. Mizrahi;Alica Goldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Imad Najm
Imad Najm Cleveland Clinic
William Bingaman
William Bingaman Cleveland Clinic
Hans Lüders
Hans Lüders Case Western Reserve University
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez
Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez Cleveland Clinic
John C. Mosher
John C. Mosher Cleveland Clinic
Andreas V. Alexopoulos
Andreas V. Alexopoulos Cleveland Clinic
Juan Bulacio
Juan Bulacio Cleveland Clinic
Riki Matsumoto
Riki Matsumoto Kobe University
Richard C. Burgess
Richard C. Burgess Case Western Reserve University
Martha J. Morrell
Martha J. Morrell Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dileep Nair

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles