World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rosemarie A. Martin

Rosemarie A. Martin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9962 9328 5249 4796 101 4180

Rosemarie A. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rosemarie A. Martin between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rosemarie A. Martin published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2013. 18 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2013. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 6 publications
1993 2025

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rosemarie A. Martin: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 2
2009 2
2010 1
2011 5
2012 2
2013 13
2014 3
2015 10
2016 10
2017 5
2018 4
2019 7
2020 8
2021 11
2022 9
2023 2
2024 12
2025 6
Total 138
Download as CSV

Rosemarie A. Martin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie A. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rosemarie A. Martin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemarie A. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rosemarie A. Martin is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in public health, epidemiology, general health professions, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work concentrates on several key topics including opioid use disorder treatment, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, prenatal substance exposure effects, criminal justice and corrections analysis, HIV related to drug use and sexual risk, health policy implementation science, and digital mental health interventions.

Frequent co-authors of Rosemarie A. Martin include Augustine Kang, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein, Jennifer G. Clarke, Josiah D. Rich, and Amelia Bailey.

Many of their research articles have been published in journals with repeated contributions. These venues include Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, and Community Mental Health Journal.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Rosemarie A. Martin include:

  • Post-incarceration outcomes of a comprehensive statewide correctional MOUD program: a retrospective cohort study, 2022, The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
  • Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Prison after Vaccination, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Treatment preference for opioid use disorder among people who are incarcerated, 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Estimating the impact of wide scale uptake of screening and medications for opioid use disorder in US prisons and jails, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Optimizing the impact of medications for opioid use disorder at release from prison and jail settings: A microsimulation modeling study, 2020, International Journal of Drug Policy

Best Publications

  • Depression Among Cocaine Abusers in Treatment: Relation to Cocaine and Alcohol Use and Treatment Outcome

    Richard A. Brown;Peter M. Monti;Mark G. Myers;Rosemarie A. Martin

  • Motivational enhancement and coping skills training for cocaine abusers: effects on substance use outcomes

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Peter M. Monti;Peter M. Monti;Rosemarie A. Martin;Suzanne M. Colby

  • Self-efficacy for cocaine abstinence: pretreatment correlates and relationship to outcomes.

    Sara L. Dolan;Rosemarie A. Martin;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Damaris J. Rohsenow

  • Brief coping skills treatment for cocaine abuse : substance use outcomes at three months

    Peter M. Monti;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Elizabeth Michalec;Rosemarie A. Martin

  • A web-based study of gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB): patterns, experiences, and functions of use.

    L.A.R. Stein;Rebecca Lebeau;Mary Clair;Rosemarie Martin

  • Latent transition analysis to the stages of change for smoking cessation

    Rosemarie A Martin;Wayne F Velicer;Joseph L Fava

  • The Important People Drug and Alcohol interview: Psychometric properties, predictive validity, and implications for treatment

    William H. Zywiak;Charles J. Neighbors;Rosemarie A. Martin;Jennifer E. Johnson

  • Conditional economic incentives to improve HIV treatment adherence: literature review and theoretical considerations.

    Omar Galárraga;Becky L. Genberg;Rosemarie A. Martin;M. Barton Laws

  • Brief coping skills treatment for cocaine abuse: 12-month substance use outcomes.

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Peter M. Monti;Rosemarie A. Martin;Elizabeth Michalec

  • Latent transition analysis for longitudinal data

    Wayne F. Velicer;Rosemarie A. Martin;Linda M. Collins

  • Melanoma Early Detection with Thorough Skin Self-Examination: The “Check It Out” Randomized Trial

    Martin A. Weinstock;Patricia M. Risica;Rosemarie A. Martin;William Rakowski

  • Forced smoking abstinence: not enough for smoking cessation.

    Jennifer G. Clarke;L. A. R. Stein;Rosemarie A. Martin;Stephen A. Martin

  • Purpose in life predicts treatment outcome among adult cocaine abusers in treatment.

    Rosemarie A. Martin;Selene MacKinnon;Jennifer Johnson;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Damaris J. Rohsenow

  • Perceived barriers to quitting smoking among alcohol dependent patients in treatment.

    Marilyn K. Asher;Rosemarie A. Martin;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Selene Varney MacKinnon

  • Predictive Validity of a Cigarette Purchase Task in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Contingent Vouchers for Smoking in Individuals With Substance Use Disorders.

    James Mackillop;Cara M. Murphy;Rosemarie A. Martin;Monika Stojek

  • Predictors of Compliance with Naltrexone Among Alcoholics

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Suzanne M. Colby;Peter M. Monti;Robert M. Swift

  • Cocaine craving as a predictor of treatment attrition and outcomes after residential treatment for cocaine dependence.

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Rosemarie A. Martin;Cheryl A. Eaton;Peter M. Monti

  • Effects of varenicline versus transdermal nicotine replacement therapy on cigarette demand on quit day in individuals with substance use disorders

    Cara M. Murphy;James MacKillop;James MacKillop;Rosemarie A. Martin;Jennifer W. Tidey

  • The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations. Development and psychometric properties.

    Damaris J Rohsenow;David B Abrams;Peter M Monti;Suzanne M Colby

  • Nicotine and other substance interaction expectancies questionnaire: relationship of expectancies to substance use.

    Damaris J. Rohsenow;Suzanne M. Colby;Rosemarie A. Martin;Peter M. Monti

Frequent Co-Authors

Damaris J. Rohsenow
Damaris J. Rohsenow Brown University
Peter M. Monti
Peter M. Monti Brown University
Suzanne M. Colby
Suzanne M. Colby Brown University
Jennifer W. Tidey
Jennifer W. Tidey Brown University
Martin A. Weinstock
Martin A. Weinstock Brown University
Robert M. Swift
Robert M. Swift Brown University
Beth C. Bock
Beth C. Bock Brown University
David B. Abrams
David B. Abrams New York University
William Rakowski
William Rakowski Brown University
Mark G. Myers
Mark G. Myers University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways. Students can pursue graduate programs that prepare them for roles in clinical counseling, school psychology, substance abuse counseling, and mental health advocacy. Flexibility in online formats makes it easier for working professionals or those with family obligations to further their education.

Choosing the right program is vital, as curriculum, faculty expertise, and accreditation can vary. For instance, see the best counseling program rankings in Mississippi, highlighting quality programs in that region. For those interested in thriving metro areas, consider the best counseling degree programs in Nashville, a city with robust educational networks and training opportunities.

The Northeast is home to many established institutions—reviewing the top counseling degree programs in the Northeast can guide applicants seeking academic excellence and strong job prospects. Meanwhile, those targeting urban opportunities should look at the best counseling program rankings in New York for access to diverse populations and career settings.

Best Scientists Citing Rosemarie A. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles