World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7498 7205 219 219 90 5635

Juan Bellas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juan Bellas between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juan Bellas published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2015. 13 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2015. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
2001 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juan Bellas: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 6
2009 2
2010 5
2011 4
2012 3
2013 3
2014 5
2015 10
2016 5
2017 1
2018 3
2019 4
2020 5
2021 7
2022 8
2023 10
2024 9
2025 4
Total 111
Download as CSV

Juan Bellas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Bellas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 90
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Juan Bellas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Bellas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Juan Bellas is a researcher affiliated with the Universidade de Vigo in Spain, specializing in Environmental Science. Their work primarily addresses issues related to pollution, toxicology, and marine environmental impacts.

The scientist's research contributions concentrate on several main fields of study, including:

  • Environmental Science

Within this broad area, their subfields of focus are:

  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Oceanography
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Major topics covered in their research include:

  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research

Juan Bellas has been involved with research appearing in a variety of scientific journals. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Chemosphere
  • Environmental Pollution
  • Aquatic Toxicology
  • Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Juan Bellas are:

  • "Polyethylene microplastics increase the toxicity of chlorpyrifos to the marine copepod Acartia tonsa," 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • "Toxicological effects induced on early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio) after an acute exposure to microplastics alone or co-exposed with copper," 2020, Chemosphere
  • "Microplastics alone or co-exposed with copper induce neurotoxicity and behavioral alterations on zebrafish larvae after a subchronic exposure," 2021, Aquatic Toxicology
  • "Single and combined acute and subchronic toxic effects of microplastics and copper in zebrafish (Danio rerio) early life stages," 2021, Chemosphere
  • "Oxidative stress, apoptosis and serotonergic system changes in zebrafish (Danio rerio) gills after long-term exposure to microplastics and copper," 2022, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology

Throughout their research career, Juan Bellas has collaborated frequently with other researchers. Their main co-authors include:

  • Víctor M. León
  • Dércia Santos
  • Ana Luzio
  • Sandra M. Monteiro
  • Marina Albentosa

Best Publications

  • Ingestion of microplastics by demersal fish from the Spanish Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts

    Juan Bellas;José Martínez-Armental;Ariana Martínez-Cámara;Victoria Besada

  • Ingestion and contact with polyethylene microplastics does not cause acute toxicity on marine zooplankton.

    R. Beiras;J. Bellas;J. Cachot;Bettie Cormier

  • Comparative toxicity of alternative antifouling biocides on embryos and larvae of marine invertebrates

    Juan Bellas

  • Assessment of coastal marine pollution in Galicia (NW Iberian Peninsula); metal concentrations in seawater, sediments and mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) versus embryo-larval bioassays using Paracentrotus lividus and Ciona intestinalis.

    Ricardo Beiras;J. Bellas;N. Fernández;J. I. Lorenzo

  • Toxicity of organic compounds to marine invertebrate embryos and larvae: a comparison between the sea urchin embryogenesis bioassay and alternative test species.

    Juan Bellas;Ricardo Beiras;José Carlos Mariño-Balsa;Nuria Fernández

  • Integrative assessment of marine pollution in Galician estuaries using sediment chemistry, mussel bioaccumulation, and embryo-larval toxicity bioassays.

    R Beiras;N Fernández;J Bellas;V Besada

  • Ecotoxicological evaluation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using marine invertebrate embryo-larval bioassays

    Juan Bellas;Liliana Saco-Álvarez;Óscar Nieto;Ricardo Beiras

  • Integrated use of antioxidant enzymes in mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, for monitoring pollution in highly productive coastal areas of Galicia (NW Spain)

    Leticia Vidal-Liñán;Juan Bellas;Juan Antonio Campillo;Ricardo Beiras

  • A review on the ecological quality status assessment in aquatic systems using community based indicators and ecotoxicological tools: what might be the added value of their combination?

    Monica Martinez-Haro;Ricardo Beiras;Juan Bellas;Ricardo Capela

  • Polyethylene microplastics increase the toxicity of chlorpyrifos to the marine copepod Acartia tonsa.

    Juan Bellas;Irene Gil

  • Toxicity of Hg, Cu, Cd, and Cr on early developmental stages of Ciona intestinalis (Chordata, Ascidiacea) with potential application in marine water quality assessment

    Juan Bellas;Elsa Vázquez;Ricardo Beiras

  • Toxicological effects induced on early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio) after an acute exposure to microplastics alone or co-exposed with copper.

    Dércia Santos;Luís Félix;Ana Luzio;Susana Parra

  • Effects of selected PAHs on reproduction and survival of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa

    Juan Bellas;Juan Bellas;Peter Thor

  • Embryotoxicity of the antifouling biocide zinc pyrithione to sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) and mussel (Mytilus edulis).

    Juan Bellas;Åke Granmo;Ricardo Beiras

  • Oxidative stress, apoptosis and serotonergic system changes in zebrafish (Danio rerio) gills after long-term exposure to microplastics and copper.

    Unknown

  • Combined use of chemical, biochemical and physiological variables in mussels for the assessment of marine pollution along the N-NW Spanish coast

    Juan Bellas;Marina Albentosa;Leticia Vidal-Liñán;Victoria Besada

  • Single and combined acute and subchronic toxic effects of microplastics and copper in zebrafish (Danio rerio) early life stages.

    Dércia Santos;Luís Félix;Ana Luzio;Susana Parra

  • Toxicity and phototoxicity of water-accommodated fraction obtained from Prestige fuel oil and Marine fuel oil evaluated by marine bioassays.

    Liliana Saco-Álvarez;Juan Bellas;Óscar Nieto;Josep María Bayona

  • Practical procedures for selected biomarkers in mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis--implications for marine pollution monitoring.

    Leticia Vidal-Liñán;Juan Bellas

  • Sublethal Effects of Trace Metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg) on Embryogenesis and Larval Settlement of the Ascidian Ciona intestinalis

    J Bellas;R Beiras;E Vázquez

  • Glutathione S-transferase, glutathione peroxidase and acetylcholinesterase activities in mussels transplanted to harbour areas.

    L. Vidal-Liñán;J. Bellas;N. Etxebarria;O. Nieto

  • Prediction and assessment of mixture toxicity of compounds in antifouling paints using the sea-urchin embryo-larval bioassay

    Juan Bellas

  • Inhibition of embryo development of the Mytilus galloprovincialis marine mussel by organic pollutants; assessment of risk for its extensive culture in the Galician Rias

    R. Beiras;J. Bellas

Frequent Co-Authors

Ricardo Beiras
Ricardo Beiras Universidade de Vigo
Ketil Hylland
Ketil Hylland University of Oslo
Kenneth M.Y. Leung
Kenneth M.Y. Leung City University of Hong Kong
Josep M. Bayona
Josep M. Bayona Spanish National Research Council
Joan Albaigés
Joan Albaigés Spanish National Research Council
Ronny Blust
Ronny Blust University of Antwerp
Gavin F. Birch
Gavin F. Birch University of Sydney
Rui Ribeiro
Rui Ribeiro University of Coimbra
Lúcia Guilhermino
Lúcia Guilhermino University of Porto
Alberto Cuesta
Alberto Cuesta University of Murcia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects and skills. Programs like 1 year mpa programs offer accelerated public administration studies, preparing graduates for leadership roles in environmental policy and management.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts on the environment is critical, making degrees such as an online bachelors in sociology a valuable complement to environmental science knowledge. These programs emphasize social dynamics, which are key when addressing ecological challenges.

For those pursuing advanced education, education doctoral programs without dissertation enable professionals to focus on applied learning without the traditional dissertation, ideal for those integrating environmental science into education or administration.

Additionally, seamless transitions from master's to doctoral levels are possible through eds to edd programs, providing an efficient path to leadership and policy-making positions in environmental education and advocacy sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Juan Bellas

Trending Scientists