World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 75 1799 1620 1059 932 267 18958
Medicine 75 19172 18002 9555 8820 268 18960

Kay Wilhelm publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kay Wilhelm between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kay Wilhelm published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2006. 6 of the 289 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2006. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 6 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1972 2025

289 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kay Wilhelm: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 6
1991 8
1992 4
1993 7
1994 8
1995 5
1996 6
1997 14
1998 11
1999 9
2000 17
2001 8
2002 7
2003 8
2004 10
2005 17
2006 21
2007 13
2008 3
2009 6
2010 3
2011 5
2012 5
2013 10
2014 6
2015 12
2016 9
2017 7
2018 4
2019 7
2020 9
2021 10
2022 1
2023 3
2024 2
2025 4
Total 289
Download as CSV

Kay Wilhelm publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay Wilhelm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 267 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 267
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kay Wilhelm D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay Wilhelm sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 75
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kay Wilhelm is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with particular focus on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics including:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Kay Wilhelm has published in multiple academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • BMJ Open
  • Australasian Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • The Medical Journal of Australia

Some of the recent research papers include:

  • The impact of frailty on mortality after heart transplantation, 2020, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Mental disorders and risk of suicide attempt in prisoners, 2020, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Persistent symptoms up to four months after community and hospital-managed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2021, The Medical Journal of Australia
  • Reversibility of Frailty after Lung Transplantation, 2020, Journal of Transplantation
  • A Web-Based Mental Health Intervention to Improve Social and Occupational Functioning in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (The Springboard Trial): 12-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kay Wilhelm include:

  • Tony Butler
  • Peter S. Macdonald
  • Sunita R. Jha
  • E. E. MONTGOMERY
  • Peter W. Schofield

Best Publications

  • Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing

    Karen A. Baikie;Kay Wilhelm

  • Implications of Childhood Trauma for Depressed Women: An Analysis of Pathways From Childhood Sexual Abuse to Deliberate Self-Harm and Revictimization

    Gemma L. Gladstone;Gordon B. Parker;Philip B. Mitchell;Gin S. Malhi

  • The stability of the Parental Bonding Instrument over a 20-year period.

    Kay Wilhelm;Heather Niven;Gordon Parker;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic

  • Reduced hippocampal volumes and memory loss in patients with early- and late-onset depression

    Ian Hickie;Sharon Naismith;Philip B. Ward;Keelin Turner

  • Subcortical hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical correlates and prognostic significance in patients with severe depression

    Ian Hickie;Elizabeth Scott;Philip Mitchell;Kay Wilhelm

  • Cognitive function in depression: a distinct pattern of frontal impairment in melancholia?

    M.-P. Austin;P. Mitchell;K. Wilhelm;G. Parker

  • ‘Big build’: hidden depression in men

    Suzanne Brownhill;Kay Wilhelm;Lesley Barclay;Virginia Schmied

  • Effectiveness of psychoeducation for relapse, symptoms, knowledge, adherence and functioning in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis.

    Tania Lincoln;K Wilhelm;Yvonne Nestoriuc

  • The clinical features of bipolar depression: a comparison with matched major depressive disorder patients.

    Philip B. Mitchell;Kay Wilhelm;Gordon Parker;Marie-Paule Austin

  • The development of a refined measure of dysfunctional parenting and assessment of its relevance in patients with affective disorders.

    Gordon Parker;J. Roussos;D. Hadzi-Pavlovic;P. Mitchell

  • Life events, first depression onset and the serotonin transporter gene.

    Kay Wilhelm;Philip B. Mitchell;Heather Niven;Adam Finch

  • Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV major depression in an Australian national survey.

    Kay Wilhelm;Philip Mitchell;Tim Slade;Suzanne Brownhill

  • A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention among people with a psychotic disorder

    Amanda Baker;Robyn Richmond;Melanie Haile;Terry J. Lewin

  • Early and late onset depression in old age: different aetiologies, same phenomenology

    Henry Brodaty;Georgina Luscombe;Gordon Parker;Kay Wilhelm;Kay Wilhelm

  • Atypical Depression: A Reappraisal

    Gordon Parker;Kay Roy;Philip Mitchell;Kay Wilhelm

  • The development of a measure of intimate bonds.

    Kay Wilhelm;Gordon Parker

  • Teacher stress? An analysis of why teachers leave and why they stay

    K. A. Y. Wilhelm;Jodie Dewhurst-Savellis;Gordon Parker

  • Development of a simple screening tool for common mental disorders in general practice.

    Ian B. Hickie;Tracey A. Davenport;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic;Annette Koschera

  • Reliability of the Parental Bonding Instrument and Intimate Bond Measure Scales

    Kay Wilhelm;Gordon Parker

  • Neuropsychological Performance in Patients With Depression is Associated With Clinical, Etiological and Genetic Risk Factors

    Sharon L. Naismith;Ian B. Hickie;Keelin Turner;Craig L. Little

  • Emotional and physical health benefits of Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing

    Karen A. Baikie;Kay Wilhelm

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon Parker
Gordon Parker University of New South Wales
Philip B. Mitchell
Philip B. Mitchell University of New South Wales
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic University of New South Wales
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Marie-Paule Austin
Marie-Paule Austin University of New South Wales
Gin S Malhi
Gin S Malhi University of Sydney
Peter S. Macdonald
Peter S. Macdonald Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Tony Butler
Tony Butler University of New South Wales
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy. Many students pursue a Master’s in fields such as clinical psychology, counseling, or social work to become licensed therapists. One popular path is marriage and family therapy (MFT), which focuses on helping individuals, couples, and families navigate mental health and relationship challenges.

Each state and city in the USA has unique licensure and education requirements for MFT professionals. For example, if you plan to practice in Newark, you will need to understand the mft requirements in Newark. Similarly, those interested in Norfolk should research the Norfolk mft certification requirements.

Aspiring therapists in the western US should review local expectations, such as the mft requirements in North Las Vegas and the mft requirements in Oakland. Online psychology degrees can prepare students for these roles, but it’s essential to verify that your program meets your local licensing regulations. Understanding regional requirements will help you choose the right academic pathway for your desired career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Kay Wilhelm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles