World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
16467
World Ranking
2701
National Ranking
134

Marie-Paule Austin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-Paule Austin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marie-Paule Austin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-Paule Austin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marie-Paule Austin is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on public health, obstetrics and gynecology, epidemiology, clinical psychology, and pediatrics. Their research primarily addresses maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, maternal and perinatal health interventions, breastfeeding practices and influences, as well as topics related to grief, bereavement, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attachment dynamics, and infant development and preterm care.

Recent publications by Marie-Paule Austin include the following:

  • "Why do some pregnant women not fully disclose at comprehensive psychosocial assessment with their midwife?" (2021, Women and Birth)
  • "Screening for anxiety disorders in third trimester pregnancy: a comparison of four brief measures" (2021, Archives of Women s Mental Health)
  • "Opening the door: midwives' perceptions of two models of psychosocial assessment in pregnancy- a mixed methods study" (2020, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth)
  • "Disclosure of sensitive material at routine antenatal psychosocial assessment: The role of psychosocial risk and mode of assessment" (2021, Women and Birth)
  • "Supporting routine psychosocial assessment in the perinatal period: The concurrent and predictive validity of the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire-Revised" (2021, Women and Birth)

Their frequent co-authors include Nicole Reilly, Victoria Mule, Emma Black, Deborah Loxton, and Dušan Hadži-Pavlović. These collaborations reflect multidisciplinary approaches within their research scope.

Marie-Paule Austin has regularly published in several academic journals, with notable publication venues including:

  • Women and Birth
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health
  • Metabolites
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • Australian Journal of Psychology

Their work within medicine comprises 34 publications focusing on key subfields, most prominently public health, environmental and occupational health (14 publications), obstetrics and gynecology (11 publications), epidemiology (6 publications), clinical psychology (4 publications), and pediatrics, perinatology and child health (3 publications).

Research topics addressed by Marie-Paule Austin cover a wide range of maternal and child health concerns:

  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care

Best Publications

  • Cognitive deficits in depression: possible implications for functional neuropathology.

    Marie-Paule Austin;Philip Mitchell;Guy M. Goodwin

  • Maternal anxiety during the transition to parenthood: a prospective study.

    Kerry Ann Grant;Catherine McMahon;Marie Paule Austin;Marie Paule Austin

  • Implications of Childhood Trauma for Depressed Women: An Analysis of Pathways From Childhood Sexual Abuse to Deliberate Self-Harm and Revictimization

    Gemma L. Gladstone;Gordon B. Parker;Philip B. Mitchell;Gin S. Malhi

  • Cognitive function in major depression

    Marie-Paule Austin;Margaret Ross;Caroline M Murray;Ronan O'Carroll

  • Subcortical hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical correlates and prognostic significance in patients with severe depression

    Ian Hickie;Elizabeth Scott;Philip Mitchell;Kay Wilhelm

  • Cognitive function in depression: a distinct pattern of frontal impairment in melancholia?

    M.-P. Austin;P. Mitchell;K. Wilhelm;G. Parker

  • The clinical features of bipolar depression: a comparison with matched major depressive disorder patients.

    Philip B. Mitchell;Kay Wilhelm;Gordon Parker;Marie-Paule Austin

  • Maternal trait anxiety, depression and life event stress in pregnancy: relationships with infant temperament

    Marie-Paule Austin;Marie-Paule Austin;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic;Leo Leader;Karen Saint

  • The development of a refined measure of dysfunctional parenting and assessment of its relevance in patients with affective disorders.

    Gordon Parker;J. Roussos;D. Hadzi-Pavlovic;P. Mitchell

  • Antenatal screening for postnatal depression: a systematic review

    M.-P. Austin;J. Lumley

  • Examining the relationship between antenatal anxiety and postnatal depression

    Marie-Paule Austin;Lucy Tully;Gordon Parker

  • Antenatal screening and early intervention for “perinatal” distress, depression and anxiety: where to from here?

    Marie Paule Austin

  • Brief antenatal cognitive behaviour therapy group intervention for the prevention of postnatal depression and anxiety: a randomised controlled trial.

    Marie-Paule. Austin;M. Frilingos;Judith Mary. Lumley;Dusan. Hadzi-Pavlovic

  • Maternal stress and obstetric and infant outcomes: epidemiological findings and neuroendocrine mechanisms

    Marie-Paule Austin;Leo Leader

  • Early and late onset depression in old age: different aetiologies, same phenomenology

    Henry Brodaty;Georgina Luscombe;Gordon Parker;Kay Wilhelm;Kay Wilhelm

  • To screen or not to screen--that is the question in perinatal depression.

    Anne E Buist;Bryanne E W Barnett;Jeannette Milgrom;Sherryl Pope

  • Depressive and anxiety disorders in the postpartum period: how prevalent are they and can we improve their detection?

    Marie-Paule V. Austin;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic;Susan R. Priest;Susan R. Priest;Nicole Reilly

  • Single photon emission tomography with 99mTc-exametazime in major depression and the pattern of brain activity underlying the psychotic/neurotic continuum.

    M P Austin;N Dougall;M Ross;C Murray

  • Maternal mortality and psychiatric morbidity in the perinatal period: challenges and opportunities for prevention in the Australian setting

    Marie-Paule Austin;Sue V. Kildea;Elizabeth D. Sullivan

  • Acceptability of routine screening for perinatal depression

    Anne Buist;John Condon;Janette Brooks;Craig Speelman

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon Parker
Gordon Parker University of New South Wales
Philip B. Mitchell
Philip B. Mitchell University of New South Wales
Kay Wilhelm
Kay Wilhelm University of Notre Dame
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic University of New South Wales
Gin S Malhi
Gin S Malhi University of Sydney
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Guy M. Goodwin
Guy M. Goodwin University of Oxford
Catherine McMahon
Catherine McMahon Macquarie University
Jeannette Milgrom
Jeannette Milgrom University of Melbourne
Suzanne King
Suzanne King McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to various career pathways, especially in social work, counseling, and human services. Many students opt for online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility without sacrificing quality. However, it’s essential to understand that specific education requirements for social workers vary by state.

For example, the Alaska education requirements for social workers emphasize obtaining the necessary licensing and degrees for different levels of practice. In Arizona, the Arizona minimum degree requirement for social workers generally involves earning at least a bachelor's in social work, with higher roles often requiring a master’s degree.

Additionally, requirements may differ in other states. For instance, the social worker degree requirements in Arkansas and degree needed to be a social worker in California both include specific educational and clinical experience criteria for licensure.

Exploring these requirements can help you choose the right online degree and ensure you are on the best path to your chosen psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Marie-Paule Austin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles