World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9255 8651 4901 4464 88 4953

Joel R. Sneed publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joel R. Sneed between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joel R. Sneed published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2021. 3 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2021. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
2001 2025

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joel R. Sneed: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 6
2007 6
2008 3
2009 7
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 5
2014 5
2015 1
2016 3
2017 3
2018 3
2019 2
2020 2
2021 8
2022 8
2023 4
2024 0
2025 3
Total 93
Download as CSV

Joel R. Sneed publications per year - data summary

  • Joel R. Sneed, a Psychology scholar from Queens College, CUNY, has 93 publications recorded across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2001 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2021 and 2022, with 8 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2001 and 2015, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 25 years in the span carries no publications at all (2024).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.9 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 23 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2001-2009: 32 publications (3.6 per year); 2010-2018: 34 publications (3.8 per year); 2019-2025: 27 publications (3.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Joel R. Sneed publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel R. Sneed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 88
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joel R. Sneed publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Joel R. Sneed, a Psychology scholar from Queens College, CUNY, records 88 publications - the 13th percentile of the discipline.
  • 13% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Joel R. Sneed, and about 87% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Joel R. Sneed ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Joel R. Sneed D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joel R. Sneed sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Joel R. Sneed D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Joel R. Sneed, a Psychology scholar from Queens College, CUNY, records 37 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Joel R. Sneed, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Joel R. Sneed ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Joel R. Sneed is affiliated with Queens College, CUNY in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's work largely concentrates on topics such as Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Mental Health Research Topics, Treatment of Major Depression, Cognitive Functions and Memory, Cognitive Abilities and Testing, and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies.

Joel R. Sneed has contributed to multiple publications, including papers that have been cited by the academic community. Some recent papers include:

  • Association of White Matter Integrity With Executive Function and Antidepressant Treatment Outcome in Patients With Late-Life Depression (2021), American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment (2022), NEJM Evidence
  • Vascular depression for radiology: A review of the construct, methodology, and diagnosis (2020), World Journal of Radiology
  • Impact of Computerized Cognitive Training on Default Mode Network Connectivity in Subjects at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease: A 78-week Randomized Controlled Trial (2022), Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Cortical thickness predicts remission of depression with antidepressants in patients with late-life depression and cognitive impairment (2021), Journal of Affective Disorders

Their frequent co-authors include Dakota A. Egglefield, Sophie Schiff, Bret R. Rutherford, Steven P. Roose, and Jeffrey N. Motter.

Joel R. Sneed's publications often appear in well-established venues, notably:

  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

This profile reflects the scope and focus of Joel R. Sneed's contributions to medical research, emphasizing areas related to neuropsychology, cognitive decline, and mental health treatments. The consistent themes in their work highlight intersections between brain connectivity, cognitive interventions, and vascular and mental health conditions.

Best Publications

  • Computerized cognitive training and functional recovery in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis.

    Jeffrey N. Motter;Jeffrey N. Motter;Monique A. Pimontel;Monique A. Pimontel;David Rindskopf;Davangere P. Devanand

  • Models of the Aging Self

    Joel R. Sneed;Susan Krauss Whitbourne

  • Does Study Design Influence Outcome? The Effects of Placebo Control and Treatment Duration in Antidepressant Trials

    Bret R. Rutherford;Joel R. Sneed;Steven P. Roose

  • Response inhibition predicts poor antidepressant treatment response in very old depressed patients.

    Joel R. Sneed;Steven P. Roose;John G. Keilp;K Ranga Rama Krishnan

  • Identity Processing and Self-Consciousness in Middle and Later Adulthood

    Joel R. Sneed;Susan Krauss Whitbourne

  • Identity Processes in Adulthood: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges

    Susan Krauss Whitbourne;Joel R. Sneed;Karyn M. Skultety

  • Design Makes a Difference: A Meta-Analysis of Antidepressant Response Rates in Placebo-Controlled Versus Comparator Trials in Late-Life Depression

    Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;Bret R. Rutherford;Bret R. Rutherford;David Rindskopf;David T. Lane

  • The vascular depression subtype: evidence of internal validity.

    Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;David Rindskopf;David C. Steffens;K. Ranga Rama Krishnan

  • Gender differences in the age-changing relationship between instrumentality and family contact in emerging adulthood.

    Joel R. Sneed;Jeffrey G. Johnson;Patricia Cohen;Carol Gilligan

  • Frailty and depression in older adults: a high-risk clinical population.

    Patrick J. Brown;Steven P. Roose;Robert Fieo;Xinhua Liu

  • The paradox of well-being, identity processes, and stereotype threat: Ageism and its potential relationships to the self in later life.

    Susan Krauss Whitbourne;Joel R. Sneed

  • Personality disorder and impaired functioning from adolescence to adulthood

    Andre W E. Skodol;Jeffrey G. Johnson;Patricia Cohen;Joel R. Sneed

  • The vascular depression hypothesis: an update.

    Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;Michelle E. Culang-Reinlieb

  • The relationship between identity, intimacy, and midlife well-being: Findings from the Rochester Adult Longitudinal Study.

    Joel R. Sneed;Susan Krauss Whitbourne;Seth J. Schwartz;Shi Huang

  • A Meta-Analysis of Executive Dysfunction and Antidepressant Treatment Response in Late-Life Depression.

    Monique A. Pimontel;Monique A. Pimontel;David Rindskopf;Bret R. Rutherford;Patrick J. Brown

  • Adolescent personality disorders and conflict with romantic partners during the transition to adulthood.

    Henian Chen;Patricia Cohen;Jeffrey G. Johnson;Stephanie Kasen

  • Change in Cognitive Functioning Following Acute Antidepressant Treatment in Late-Life Depression

    Michelle E. Culang;Michelle E. Culang;Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;John G. Keilp;Bret R. Rutherford

  • A Multicultural Critique of Identity Status Theory and Research: A Call for Integration

    Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;Seth J. Schwartz;William E. Cross

  • Executive dysfunction and treatment response in late-life depression.

    Monique A. Pimontel;Michelle E. Culang-Reinlieb;Sarah S. Morimoto;Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed

  • Antidepressant Medication and Executive Dysfunction: A Deleterious Interaction in Late-Life Depression

    Joel R. Sneed;Joel R. Sneed;Michelle E. Culang;Michelle E. Culang;John G. Keilp;Bret R. Rutherford

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven P. Roose
Steven P. Roose Columbia University
Devangere P. Devanand
Devangere P. Devanand Columbia University
Patricia Cohen
Patricia Cohen Columbia University
Harold A. Sackeim
Harold A. Sackeim Columbia University
John G. Keilp
John G. Keilp Columbia University
Adam M. Brickman
Adam M. Brickman Columbia University
Susan Krauss Whitbourne
Susan Krauss Whitbourne University of Massachusetts Amherst
P. Murali Doraiswamy
P. Murali Doraiswamy Duke University
Henian Chen
Henian Chen University of South Florida
Stephanie Kasen
Stephanie Kasen Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career options. Many students interested in psychology also consider becoming licensed social workers, as the two fields often overlap in skills and goals. Each state sets its own educational requirements for social workers, so it's important to be aware of specific criteria if you're planning your pathway.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in Utah typically involves a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in social work, with advanced roles requiring further credentials. Similarly, Vermont education requirements for social workers may require graduating from a program accredited by the Council on Social Work Education. If you’re considering work in the southern U.S., understanding the social worker education requirements in Virginia is essential, as state licensure often involves supervised experience as well as formal education.

For those looking at the Pacific Northwest, be sure to check social worker degree requirements in Washington, which highlight the importance of both academic credentials and clinical training. Studying psychology online can be a flexible way to meet these educational demands and launch a career related to mental health, counseling, or community support services.

Best Scientists Citing Joel R. Sneed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles