World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
11838
World Ranking
3866
National Ranking
1758

Warren D. Taylor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren D. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 179 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Warren D. Taylor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren D. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Warren D. Taylor is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their work focuses primarily on medicine and neuroscience, with a significant concentration on cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry, mental health, and biological psychiatry.

Their main research themes include functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research topics, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, tryptophan and brain disorders, advanced MRI techniques and applications, treatment of major depression, and stress responses and cortisol.

Warren D. Taylor has frequently published in these venues:

  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • International Psychogeriatrics

They have collaborated extensively with the following co-authors:

  • Brian D. Boyd
  • Bennett A. Landman
  • Sarah M. Szymkowicz
  • Olusola Ajilore
  • Carmen Andreescu

Recent publications by Warren D. Taylor include:

  • "Influences of dopaminergic system dysfunction on late-life depression," 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Biological factors influencing depression in later life: role of aging processes and treatment implications," 2023, Translational Psychiatry
  • "PreQual: An automated pipeline for integrated preprocessing and quality assurance of diffusion weighted MRI images," 2021, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • "Association of 24-Hour Activity Pattern Phenotypes With Depression Symptoms and Cognitive Performance in Aging," 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Accelerated brain aging predicts impaired cognitive performance and greater disability in geriatric but not midlife adult depression," 2020, Translational Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites.

    Jean-Philippe Fortin;Nicholas C. Cullen;Yvette I. Sheline;Warren D. Taylor

  • The vascular depression hypothesis: mechanisms linking vascular disease with depression.

    Warren D. Taylor;Howard J. Aizenstein;George S. Alexopoulos

  • Depression in the Elderly

    Warren D. Taylor

  • Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex White Matter Alterations in Late-Life Depression

    Jae Nam Bae;James R. MacFall;K. Ranga R. Krishnan;Martha E. Payne

  • Effects of early life stress on depression, cognitive performance and brain morphology.

    Ayman Saleh;Guy G. Potter;Douglas R. McQuoid;Brian Boyd

  • Clinical characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging-defined subcortical ischemic depression.

    K.Ranga Rama Krishnan;Warren D Taylor;Douglas R McQuoid;James R MacFall

  • Support for the vascular depression hypothesis in late-life depression: results of a 2-site, prospective, antidepressant treatment trial.

    Yvette I. Sheline;Carl F. Pieper;M Deanna;Kathleen Welsh-Boehmer

  • Late-life depression and microstructural abnormalities in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex white matter.

    Warren D. Taylor;James R. MacFall;Martha E. Payne;Douglas R. McQuoid

  • White Matter Hyperintensity Progression and Late-Life Depression Outcomes

    Warren D. Taylor;David C. Steffens;James R. MacFall;Douglas R. McQuoid

  • Diffusion tensor imaging: background, potential, and utility in psychiatric research.

    Warren D. Taylor;Edward Hsu;K.Ranga Rama Krishnan;James R. MacFall

  • Vascular depression consensus report - a critical update.

    Howard J. Aizenstein;Andrius Baskys;Maura Boldrini;Meryl A. Butters

  • Influence of serotonin transporter promoter region polymorphisms on hippocampal volumes in late-life depression.

    Warren D. Taylor;David C. Steffens;Martha E. Payne;James R. MacFall

  • Cortical White Matter Microstructural Abnormalities in Bipolar Disorder

    John L Beyer;Warren D Taylor;James R MacFall;Maragatha Kuchibhatla

  • Evidence of white matter tract disruption in MRI hyperintensities

    Warren D Taylor;Martha E Payne;K.Ranga Rama Krishnan;H.Ryan Wagner

  • Greater MRI lesion volumes in elderly depressed subjects than in control subjects.

    Warren D. Taylor;James R. MacFall;Martha E. Payne;Douglas R. McQuoid

  • Association of five-factor model personality domains and facets with presence, onset, and treatment outcomes of major depression in older adults.

    R. David Hayward;Warren D. Taylor;Moria J. Smoski;David C. Steffens

  • Hippocampus Atrophy and the Longitudinal Course of Late-life Depression

    Warren D. Taylor;Douglas R. McQuoid;Martha E. Payne;Anthony S. Zannas

  • Serial MR imaging of volumes of hyperintense white matter lesions in elderly patients: correlation with vascular risk factors.

    Warren D Taylor;James R MacFall;James M Provenzale;Martha E Payne

  • Frontal White Matter Anisotropy and Antidepressant Remission in Late-Life Depression

    Warren D. Taylor;Maragatha Kuchibhatla;Martha E. Payne;James R. MacFall

  • Reduction of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex gray matter in late-life depression

    Cheng-Chen Chang;Shun-Chieh Yu;Douglas R. McQuoid;Denise F. Messer

  • Localization of age-associated white matter hyperintensities in late-life depression.

    Warren D. Taylor;James R. MacFall;David C. Steffens;Martha E. Payne

  • Orbitofrontal cortex volume in late life depression: influence of hyperintense lesions and genetic polymorphisms.

    Warren D. Taylor;James R. MacFALL;Martha E. Payne;Douglas R. McQUOID

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Steffens
David C. Steffens University of Connecticut
James R. MacFall
James R. MacFall Duke University
K. Ranga Rama Krishnan
K. Ranga Rama Krishnan Rush University Medical Center
Paul A. Newhouse
Paul A. Newhouse Vanderbilt University
Bennett A. Landman
Bennett A. Landman Vanderbilt University
Guy G. Potter
Guy G. Potter Duke University
James M. Provenzale
James M. Provenzale Duke University
Allison E. Ashley-Koch
Allison E. Ashley-Koch Duke University
P. Murali Doraiswamy
P. Murali Doraiswamy Duke University
Susan M. Resnick
Susan M. Resnick National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to several complementary online degrees and evolving career pathways. Many students leverage their background in neuroscience by pursuing counseling and psychology-focused graduate degrees online, allowing for specialization and greater flexibility.

For those interested in supporting mental well-being, accredited online mental health counseling programs offer advanced knowledge in assessment and therapy techniques. Alternatively, students seeking a direct route into therapy roles may benefit from online masters counseling programs, which often feature practical training and licensure pathways.

Specializing further, an marriage and family therapy degree online prepares graduates to work in clinical settings focusing on family dynamics and relationships. Broadening the scope, an online masters in psychology is a versatile option for careers in research, mental health services, or organizational psychology.

With numerous accessible and affordable online degree tracks now available, neuroscience graduates can broaden their expertise and advance their professional journey in mental health, counseling, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Warren D. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles