World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6914 6445 131 129 204 9017

Sara Poletti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sara Poletti between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sara Poletti published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2023. 36 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2023. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 18 publications
2006 2025

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sara Poletti: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 10
2012 7
2013 8
2014 18
2015 19
2016 13
2017 21
2018 8
2019 14
2020 15
2021 24
2022 27
2023 40
2024 18
2025 18
Total 272
Download as CSV

Sara Poletti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara Poletti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 204 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 204
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sara Poletti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara Poletti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sara Poletti is affiliated with Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Italy and has a significant publication record predominantly in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their research encompasses a variety of topics related to brain function, mental health, and psychiatric conditions.

Their work spans several subfields, including:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Clinical Psychology

Main topics of research covered by Sara Poletti include:

  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Sara Poletti has published multiple papers, several of which focus on psychiatric and neurocognitive impacts of COVID-19, such as:

  • "Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors" (2020), published in Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "Persistent psychopathology and neurocognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: Effect of inflammatory biomarkers at three-month follow-up" (2021), published in Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "Post-COVID-19 Depressive Symptoms: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Pharmacological Treatment" (2022), published in CNS Drugs
  • "All roads lead to the default-mode network-global source of DMN abnormalities in major depressive disorder" (2020), published in Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "A Delphi-method-based consensus guideline for definition of treatment-resistant depression for clinical trials" (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors with whom Sara Poletti has collaborated include:

  • Francesco Benedetti
  • Raffaella Zanardi
  • Benedetta Vai
  • Cristina Colombo
  • Irene Bollettini

Publication venues where Sara Poletti's work appears frequently include:

  • Neuroscience Applied
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • European Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity

Best Publications

  • Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors.

    Mario Gennaro Mazza;Rebecca De Lorenzo;Caterina Conte;Sara Poletti

  • Post-COVID-19 Depressive Symptoms: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Pharmacological Treatment

    Unknown

  • Disruption of White Matter Integrity in Bipolar Depression as a Possible Structural Marker of Illness

    Francesco Benedetti;Ping Hong Yeh;Marcella Bellani;Daniele Radaelli

  • Lithium and GSK3-β Promoter Gene Variants Influence White Matter Microstructure in Bipolar Disorder

    Francesco Benedetti;Irene Bollettini;Ignazio Barberi;Daniele Radaelli

  • Opposite effects of suicidality and lithium on gray matter volumes in bipolar depression.

    Francesco Benedetti;Daniele Radaelli;Sara Poletti;Sara Poletti;Clara Locatelli

  • Functional and structural brain correlates of theory of mind and empathy deficits in schizophrenia

    Francesco Benedetti;Alessandro Bernasconi;Marta Bosia;Roberto Cavallaro

  • All roads lead to the default-mode network—global source of DMN abnormalities in major depressive disorder

    Andrea Scalabrini;Benedetta Vai;Sara Poletti;Stefano Damiani

  • Inflammatory cytokines influence measures of white matter integrity in Bipolar Disorder

    Francesco Benedetti;Sara Poletti;Thomas A. Hoogenboezem;Elena Mazza

  • Tract-specific white matter structural disruption in patients with bipolar disorder

    Francesco Benedetti;Martina Absinta;Maria A Rocca;Daniele Radaelli

  • The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Normative data for the Italian population

    Simona Anselmetti;Sara Poletti;Elena Ermoli;Margherita Bechi

  • Rapid treatment response of suicidal symptoms to lithium, sleep deprivation, and light therapy (chronotherapeutics) in drug-resistant bipolar depression.

    Francesco Benedetti;Roberta Riccaboni;Clara Locatelli;Sara Poletti

  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large‐scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group

    Christopher R K Ching;Derrek P Hibar;Tiril P Gurholt;Tiril P Gurholt;Abraham Nunes

  • Long-term consequences of COVID-19 on cognitive functioning up to 6 months after discharge: role of depression and impact on quality of life.

    Sara Poletti;Mariagrazia Palladini;Mario Gennaro Mazza;Rebecca De Lorenzo

  • Influence of catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism on neuropsychological and functional outcomes of classical rehabilitation and cognitive remediation in schizophrenia.

    Marta Bosia;Margherita Bechi;Elena Marino;Simona Anselmetti

  • Computer-aided neurocognitive remediation as an enhancing strategy for schizophrenia rehabilitation.

    Roberto Cavallaro;Simona Anselmetti;Sara Poletti;Margherita Bechi

  • A peripheral inflammatory signature discriminates bipolar from unipolar depression: A machine learning approach

    Sara Poletti;Benedetta Vai;Mario Gennaro Mazza;Raffaella Zanardi

  • Common and distinct structural features of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: The European Network on Psychosis, Affective disorders and Cognitive Trajectory (ENPACT) study.

    Eleonora Maggioni;Benedicto Crespo-Facorro;Igor Nenadic;Francesco Benedetti

  • Mapping Cortical and Subcortical Asymmetry in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Consortium

    Xiang-Zhen Kong;Premika S W Boedhoe;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • Cognitive performances associate with measures of white matter integrity in bipolar disorder.

    Sara Poletti;Irene Bollettini;Elena Mazza;Clara Locatelli

  • Fronto-limbic disconnection in bipolar disorder

    D. Radaelli;G. Sferrazza Papa;B. Vai;S. Poletti

  • Adverse childhood experiences influence white matter microstructure in patients with bipolar disorder

    F. Benedetti;I. Bollettini;D. Radaelli;S. Poletti

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Benedetti
Francesco Benedetti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Cristina Colombo
Cristina Colombo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Enrico Smeraldi
Enrico Smeraldi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Benedetta Vai
Benedetta Vai IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Irene Bollettini
Irene Bollettini San Raffaele Hospital
Cristina Lorenzi
Cristina Lorenzi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Andrea Falini
Andrea Falini Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Roberto Furlan
Roberto Furlan San Raffaele Hospital
Paolo Brambilla
Paolo Brambilla University of Milan
Hemmo A. Drexhage
Hemmo A. Drexhage Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a variety of related career paths, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. For those interested in affordable education options, there are many programs across the United States that make becoming a qualified counselor accessible.

Students based in Philadelphia can review the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Philadelphia to find local opportunities that fit their budget. If you're located in Texas or considering distance learning options there, check out the cheapest online counseling degrees in Texas for more choices.

Broader national options can be found by consulting the affordable online counseling degrees in the US, which highlights cost-effective programs available to students across the country. Meanwhile, those interested in regional trends and top-rated programs in the Southwest can explore popular counseling programs in Arizona for additional inspiration.

By comparing these options, students can find online degrees that match their interests, location, and financial needs—creating clear pathways into rewarding psychology and counseling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Sara Poletti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles