World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7188 6751 3770 3489 308 58272

Deborah Grady publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deborah Grady between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deborah Grady published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2002. 11 of the 324 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2002. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 8 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

324 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deborah Grady: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 4
1989 0
1990 3
1991 6
1992 5
1993 7
1994 4
1995 14
1996 9
1997 6
1998 13
1999 9
2000 10
2001 13
2002 18
2003 13
2004 7
2005 10
2006 14
2007 9
2008 7
2009 15
2010 8
2011 15
2012 14
2013 5
2014 8
2015 7
2016 7
2017 15
2018 13
2019 5
2020 1
2021 8
2022 1
2023 9
2024 9
2025 2
Total 324
Download as CSV

Deborah Grady publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Grady sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 308
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Deborah Grady D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah Grady sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Deborah Grady is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a substantial focus on related subfields including Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Genetics.

Their work spans several main topics including Healthcare Policy and Management, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare cost, quality, practices, Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments, Estrogen and related hormone effects, Phytoestrogen effects and research, and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes.

Deborah Grady has contributed extensively to academic literature, especially in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine, where they have published 26 papers. Other publication venues include JAMA and the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Recent publications include:

  • Improving Women's Health Across the Life Span-JAMA Internal Medicine Call for Papers (2024), JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Randomized Clinical Trials That Advance Health and Health Equity (2024), JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Older Outpatient Women (2024), JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Recommendations From Breast Cancer Centers for Frequent Screening Mammography in Younger Women May Do More Harm Than Good (2021), JAMA Internal Medicine
  • The Next Frontier of Less Is More-From Description to Implementation (2021), JAMA Internal Medicine

Frequent coauthors of Deborah Grady include:

  • Mitchell H. Katz
  • Sharon K. Inouye
  • Rita F. Redberg
  • Alison J. Huang
  • Lona Mody

Their academic contributions in medicine cover 41 publications, showing breadth and depth in the domain.

Deborah Grady has been recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) since 2009.

Best Publications

  • Randomized Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Women

    Stephen Hulley;Deborah Grady;Trudy Bush;Curt Furberg

  • Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women

    D. Grady;S.M. Rubin;D.B. Petitti;C.S. Fox

  • The Effect of Raloxifene on Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Results From the MORE Randomized Trial

    Steven R. Cummings;Stephen Eckert;Kathryn A. Krueger;Deborah Grady

  • Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes During 6.8 Years of Hormone Therapy: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study Follow-up (HERS II)

    Stephen Hulley;Curt Furberg;Elizabeth Barrett-Connor;Jane Cauley

  • Evidence-Based Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women

    Lori Mosca;Lawrence J. Appel;Emelia J. Benjamin;Kathy Berra

  • Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

    Karla Kerlikowske;Deborah Grady;Deborah Grady;Susan M. Rubin;Christian E Sandrock

  • Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: A meta-analysis

    Deborah Grady;Tebeb Gebretsadik;Tebeb Gebretsadik;Tebeb Gebretsadik;Karla Kerlikowske;Karla Kerlikowske;Karla Kerlikowske;Virginia Ernster;Virginia Ernster;Virginia Ernster

  • Effects of raloxifene on cardiovascular events and breast cancer in postmenopausal women

    Elizabeth Barrett-Connor;Lori Mosca;Peter Collins;Mary Jane Geiger

  • Estrogen Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: Effects on Cognitive Function and Dementia

    Kristine Yaffe;George Sawaya;Ivan Lieberburg;Deborah Grady

  • Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach

    Stephen B Hulley;Steven R Cummings;Warren S Browner;Deborah Grady

  • Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Karla Kerlikowske;Vickie A. Feldstein;Leslee Subak

  • Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Increases Risk for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study

    Deborah Grady;Nanette K. Wenger;David Herrington;Steven Khan

  • Effect of Age, Breast Density, and Family History on the Sensitivity of First Screening Mammography

    Karla Kerlikowske;Deborah Grady;John Barclay;Edward A. Sickles

  • Antibiotics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. A meta-analysis.

    Sanjay Saint;Stephen Bent;Eric Vittinghoff;Deborah Grady

  • Raloxifene and Cardiovascular Events in Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women: Four-Year Results From the MORE (Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation) Randomized Trial

    Elizabeth Barrett-Connor;Deborah Grady;Andreas Sashegyi;Pamela W. Anderson

  • HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY, HEART DISEASE, AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

    Elizabeth Barrett-Connor;Deborah Grady

  • Urinary Incontinence: Does it Increase Risk for Falls and Fractures?

    Jeanette S. Brown;Eric Vittinghoff;Jean F. Wyman;Katie L. Stone

  • Adding Heparin to Aspirin Reduces the Incidence of Myocardial Infarction and Death in Patients With Unstable Angina: A Meta-analysis

    Allison Oler;Mary A. Whooley;Jacqueline Oler;Deborah Grady

  • Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

    Virginia L. Ernster;John Barclay;Karla Kerlikowske;Deborah Grady

  • Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm

    Craig Frances;Anthony Romero;Deborah Grady

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Vittinghoff
Eric Vittinghoff University of California, San Francisco
Stephen B. Hulley
Stephen B. Hulley University of California, San Francisco
Karla Kerlikowske
Karla Kerlikowske University of California, San Francisco
Rita F. Redberg
Rita F. Redberg University of California, San Francisco
Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Elizabeth Barrett-Connor University of California, San Diego
Steven R. Cummings
Steven R. Cummings University of California, San Francisco
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco
Kristine E. Ensrud
Kristine E. Ensrud University of Minnesota
Nanette K. Wenger
Nanette K. Wenger Emory University
Jane A. Cauley
Jane A. Cauley University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medical studies but seeking alternative routes, a variety of online degree options are available. Many students explore nursing as a practical pathway into healthcare due to the flexibility and variety of online programs. For those who are already registered nurses, some universities offer rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, making it easier to advance while balancing work and study.

Aspiring nurse practitioners can benefit from time-saving options like the shortest online dnp program, which allows you to earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice quickly. Others may prefer easy dnp programs designed for accessible coursework and manageable learning schedules.

For those just starting their healthcare careers, an accelerated lpn program can provide a fast track into practical nursing roles. These online degrees not only broaden your career options, but also offer flexibility for students with work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah Grady

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles