World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
71
Citations
30409
World Ranking
19928
National Ranking
9924

Rita F. Redberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita F. Redberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 548 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rita F. Redberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita F. Redberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Rita F. Redberg is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research focuses on medicine, producing a substantial body of work with 215 publications in the field. The subfields of study that characterize their output include economics and econometrics, general health professions, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their scholarly work covers various topics with a strong emphasis on health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life; healthcare cost, quality, and practices; impacts of health and medical research; ethics in clinical research; cardiac imaging and diagnostics; acute myocardial infarction research; and the application of artificial intelligence in healthcare and education.

Rita F. Redberg has published numerous papers in prominent medical journals. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Generating comparative evidence on new drugs and devices before approval," 2020, The Lancet
  • "Long-term Outcomes in Use of Opioids, Nonpharmacologic Pain Interventions, and Total Costs of Spinal Cord Stimulators Compared With Conventional Medical Therapy for Chronic Pain," 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • "Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: one decade after FDAAA," 2020, Trials
  • "Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Sexual Orientation of Editors at Leading Medical and Scientific Journals," 2021, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Equity and the JAMA Network," 2021, JAMA

The frequent coauthors contributing alongside Rita F. Redberg include Sanket S. Dhruva, Robert O. Bonow, Dimitri Christakis, Melina R. Kibbe, and Döst Öngür, indicating collaborative work across multiple research projects.

Their publications often appear in high-impact journals such as JAMA Internal Medicine, JAMA, Circulation, JAMA Network Open, and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. The distribution of their publications across these venues highlights a focus on internal medicine, cardiology, and broader clinical research.

In recognition of professional accomplishments, Rita F. Redberg was named a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in People With Diabetes Mellitus A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association

    John B. Buse;Henry N. Ginsberg;George L. Bakris;Nathaniel G. Clark

  • ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging*

    Robert C. Hendel;Manesh R. Patel;Christopher M. Kramer;Michael Poon

  • Low Diagnostic Yield of Elective Coronary Angiography

    Manesh R. Patel;Eric D. Peterson;David Dai;J. Matthew Brennan

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 Update

    Lori Mosca;Carole L. Banka;Emelia J. Benjamin;Kathy Berra

  • Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the lipid research clinics prevalence study.

    Samia Mora;Rita F. Redberg;Yadong Cui;Yadong Cui;Maura K. Whiteman

  • Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: Consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association.

    Jennifer H. Mieres;Leslee J. Shaw;Andrew Arai;Matthew J. Budoff

  • The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis.

    Louise D. Metz;Mary Beattie;Robert Hom;Rita F. Redberg

  • Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women.

    Yeong Kwok;Catherine Kim;Deborah Grady;Mark Segal

  • Guide to Preventive Cardiology for Women

    Lori Mosca;Scott M. Grundy;Debra Judelson;Kathleen King

  • Awareness, Perception, and Knowledge of Heart Disease Risk and Prevention Among Women in the United States

    Lori Mosca;Wanda K. Jones;Kathleen B. King;Pamela Ouyang

  • Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: executive summary: conference proceeding for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the American Heart Association.

    Scott M. Grundy;Barbara Howard;Sidney Smith;Robert Eckel

  • Sex Differences in Major Bleeding With Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Results From the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Initiative

    Karen P. Alexander;Anita Y. Chen;L. Kristin Newby;Janice B. Schwartz

  • Transesophageal echocardiographically detected atherosclerotic aortic plaque is a marker for coronary artery disease

    Gary P. Fazio;Rita F. Redberg;Timothy Winslow;Nelson B. Schiller

  • Active Compression-Decompression: A New Method of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

    Todd J. Cohen;Todd J. Cohen;Kelly J. Tucker;Keith G. Lurie;Rita F. Redberg

  • ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology).

    Alfred E. Buxton;Hugh Calkins;David J. Callans;John P. DiMarco

  • Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

    Grace A. Lin;R. Adams Dudley;F. L. Lucas;David J. Malenka

  • Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: a meta-analysis☆

    C. Kim;Y.S. Kwok;P. Heagerty;R. Redberg

  • Cardiovascular disease in women.

    Rita F Redberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara University of Washington
Nelson B. Schiller
Nelson B. Schiller University of California, San Francisco
Mary L. Disis
Mary L. Disis University of Washington
Deborah Grady
Deborah Grady University of California, San Francisco
Neil M. Bressler
Neil M. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert O. Bonow
Robert O. Bonow Northwestern University
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Clyde W. Yancy
Clyde W. Yancy Northwestern University
Elyse Foster
Elyse Foster University of California, San Francisco
Dimitri A. Christakis
Dimitri A. Christakis Seattle Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but looking for flexible or alternative routes, there are several online degree options offering diverse career pathways. Many healthcare professionals look for accelerated programs, especially if they want to quickly advance their qualifications and career prospects.

For nurses aiming for the highest clinical roles, a 1 year dnp program online allows earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice quickly and efficiently. Similarly, those seeking fast entry into nursing can consider a 6 month lpn program to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less than a year.

Mental health care providers have flexible options as well. The shortest pmhnp program helps registered nurses qualify as Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners at an accelerated pace. For those interested in healthcare leadership, an affordable healthcare administration degree online offers a cost-effective entry to management roles within the health sector.

Exploring these online degrees can help you tailor your education to meet your schedule, budget, and career goals—making a medical career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Rita F. Redberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles