World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonie J. van den Bogert

Antonie J. van den Bogert

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
15971
World Ranking
3996
National Ranking
1154

Antonie J. van den Bogert publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonie J. van den Bogert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Antonie J. van den Bogert D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonie J. van den Bogert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonie J. van den Bogert is affiliated with Cleveland State University in the United States and has an extensive record of research focusing on various aspects of biomechanics, rehabilitation, and biomedical engineering. Their work encompasses multiple interdisciplinary fields and topics with a strong emphasis on muscle activation, gait analysis, and prosthetic development.

The main fields of study for Antonie include Engineering and Medicine, with specific subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The research interests of Antonie are reflected in their contributions to the following main topics:

  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Several recent papers exemplify Antonie's research trajectory:

  • "CNN-Based Estimation of Sagittal Plane Walking and Running Biomechanics From Measured and Simulated Inertial Sensor Data" (2020) published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • "Review of musculoskeletal modelling in a clinical setting: Current use in rehabilitation design, surgical decision making and healthcare interventions" (2021) published in Clinical Biomechanics
  • "Efficient trajectory optimization for curved running using a 3D musculoskeletal model with implicit dynamics" (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Model-Based Control of Individual Finger Movements for Prosthetic Hand Function" (2020) published in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  • "Antagonistic co-contraction can minimize muscular effort in systems with uncertainty" (2022) published in PeerJ

Antonie frequently collaborates with various coauthors, including Anne D. Koelewijn, D. Heinrich, Huawei Wang, Werner Nachbauer, and Hanz Richter. These collaborations highlight a research network engaged in the advancement of biomechanical and rehabilitation sciences.

The scientist's publications are commonly found in venues that include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Scientific Reports, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, and the Journal of Biomechanics. These journals and repositories reflect a concentration on bioengineering, rehabilitation technology, and applied biomechanics.

Best Publications

  • Biomechanical Measures of Neuromuscular Control and Valgus Loading of the Knee Predict Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Female Athletes A Prospective Study

    Timothy E. Hewett;Timothy E. Hewett;Gregory D. Myer;Kevin R. Ford;Robert S. Heidt

  • Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements

    Ahmet Erdemir;Scott McLean;Walter Herzog;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Effect of gender and defensive opponent on the biomechanics of sidestep cutting

    Scott G. Mclean;Susanne W. Lipfert;Antonie J. Van Den Bogert

  • Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: implications for injury prevention.

    Eirik Kristianslund;Tron Krosshaug;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Association between lower extremity posture at contact and peak knee valgus moment during sidestepping: Implications for ACL injury

    Scott G. McLean;Xuemei M. Huang;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Sagittal plane biomechanics cannot injure the ACL during sidestep cutting

    Scott G. McLean;Xuemei Huang;Anne Su;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Optimality principles for model-based prediction of human gait.

    Marko Ackermann;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe running

    Karin G M Gerritsen;Antonie J. Van den Bogert;Benno M. Nigg

  • A real-time system for biomechanical analysis of human movement and muscle function

    Antonie J. van den Bogert;Thomas Geijtenbeek;Oshri Even-Zohar;Frans Steenbrink

  • Horses damp the spring in their step

    A M Wilson;M P McGuigan;A Su;A J van Den Bogert

  • In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: An optimization approach

    Antonie J. Van den Bogert;Graham D. Smith;Benno M. Nigg

  • Implicit methods for efficient musculoskeletal simulation and optimal control.

    Antonie J. van den Bogert;Dimitra Blana;Dimitra Blana;Dieter Heinrich

  • Tibiocalcaneal kinematics of barefoot versus shod running

    Alex Stacoff;Alex Stacoff;Benno M. Nigg;Christoph Reinschmidt;Christoph Reinschmidt;Antonie J. van den Bogert;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Exotendons for assistance of human locomotion

    Antonie J van den Bogert

  • Personal Navigation via High-Resolution Gait-Corrected Inertial Measurement Units

    Özkan Bebek;Michael A Suster;Srihari Rajgopal;Michael J Fu

  • The influence of orthotic devices and vastus medialis strength and timing on patellofemoral loads during running

    Richard R Neptune;I. C. Wright;A. J. Van Den Bogert

  • Effects of shoe sole construction on skeletal motion during running.

    Alex Stacoff;Christoph Reinschmidt;Benno M. Nigg;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • ISB recommendations on the reporting of intersegmental forces and moments during human motion analysis.

    Timothy R Derrick;Antonie J van den Bogert;Andrea Cereatti;Raphael Dumas

  • Apparatus for assisting body movement

    Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Estimation of gait kinematics and kinetics from inertial sensor data using optimal control of musculoskeletal models

    Eva Dorschky;Marlies Nitschke;Ann-Kristin Seifer;Antonie J. van den Bogert

  • Investigating Isolated Neuromuscular Control Contributions to Non-Contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk via Computer Simulation Methods

    Scott G. McLean;Xuemei Huang;Antonie J. van den Bogert

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan Simon
Dan Simon Cleveland State University
Benno M. Nigg
Benno M. Nigg University of Calgary
Gregory D. Myer
Gregory D. Myer Emory University
Michael S. Branicky
Michael S. Branicky University of Kansas
Bjoern M. Eskofier
Bjoern M. Eskofier University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Richard R. Neptune
Richard R. Neptune The University of Texas at Austin
Kevin R. Ford
Kevin R. Ford High Point University
Carlos H. Mastrangelo
Carlos H. Mastrangelo University of Utah
Ilse Jonkers
Ilse Jonkers KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible and accelerated pathways in Engineering and Technology is higher than ever. Many students and working professionals are seeking programs that offer a balance between rigorous education and life’s responsibilities.

For those looking to complete their education in a short span, a masters degree in 6 months can be an attractive option. These intensive programs allow students to quickly upskill and enter or advance in technical roles.

Alternatives to traditional degrees also exist, such as certifications that pay well in technology sectors. Certifications can lead to lucrative positions and are ideal for those seeking job-ready skills without a multi-year commitment.

For parents and caregivers, online degrees for moms provide the needed flexibility to balance personal and career goals. Many programs are designed for busy adults with asynchronous learning options.

If you’re eager to get started quickly, explore 6 week certification programs online in areas like IT, engineering basics, or technical support. These short-term courses make it possible to earn valuable credentials in just weeks.

Best Scientists Citing Antonie J. van den Bogert

Trending Scientists