World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William E. Garrett

William E. Garrett

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
46388
World Ranking
6200
National Ranking
3304

William E. Garrett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Garrett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 368 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William E. Garrett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Garrett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Garrett was affiliated with Duke University in the United States. The primary focus of their research spanned the field of Medicine, with particular attention to Surgery and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Additional areas of study included Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Mechanical Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering.

The researcher published extensively on topics related to knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, sports injuries and prevention, cardiovascular effects of exercise, electrical contact performance and analysis, sports performance and training, and sport psychology and performance.

Notable recent papers by William E. Garrett included:

  • The mechanism of hamstring injuries - a systematic review, 2020, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Mechanisms of non-contact ACL injuries, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Injury rate, mechanism, and risk factors of hamstring strain injuries in sports: A review of the literature, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Reconsidering Reciprocal Length Patterns of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament During In Vivo Gait, 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Relative age effect: beyond the youth phenomenon, 2020, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine

Frequent coauthors who collaborated with William E. Garrett included Bing Yu, Zoë A. Englander, Jocelyn R. Wittstein, and Louis E. DeFrate. These collaborations appeared multiple times across various publications.

The majority of their work was published in venues such as UNC Libraries, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, and Neurology.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

    Boden Bp;Dean Gs;Feagin Ja;Garrett We

  • Mechanisms of non-contact ACL injuries

    Bing Yu;William E Garrett

  • Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies.

    L. Y. Griffin;J. Agel;M. J. Albohm;Elizabeth A Arendt

  • Effectiveness of a Neuromuscular and Proprioceptive Training Program in Preventing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes 2-Year Follow-up

    Bert R. Mandelbaum;Holly J. Silvers;Diane S. Watanabe;John F. Knarr

  • Understanding and Preventing Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries A Review of the Hunt Valley II Meeting, January 2005

    Letha Y. Griffin;Marjorie J. Albohm;Elizabeth A. Arendt;Roald Bahr

  • Epidemiology of Concussion in Collegiate and High School Football Players

    Kevin M. Guskiewicz;Nancy L. Weaver;Darin A. Padua;William E. Garrett

  • Viscoelastic properties of muscle-tendon units. The biomechanical effects of stretching.

    Dean C. Taylor;James D. Dalton;Anthony V. Seaber;William E. Garrett

  • Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: An International Olympic Committee current concepts statement

    Per Renstrom;A. Ljungqvist;E. Arendt;B. Beynnon

  • A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks.

    Robert A. Malinzak;Scott M. Colby;Donald T. Kirkendall;Bing Yu

  • Muscle strain injuries

    WE Garrett

  • The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Is a Valid and Reliable Clinical Assessment Tool of Jump-Landing Biomechanics The JUMP-ACL Study

    Darin A. Padua;Stephen W. Marshall;Michelle C. Boling;Charles A. Thigpen

  • A Comparison of Knee Kinetics between Male and Female Recreational Athletes in Stop-Jump Tasks

    Jonathan D. Chappell;Bing Yu;Donald T. Kirkendall;William E. Garrett

  • Muscle strain injuries: clinical and basic aspects.

    William E. Garrett

  • Acute Dislocation of the Patella A Correlative Pathoanatomic Study

    Peter I. Sallay;Jeffery Poggi;Kevin P. Speer;William E. Garrett

  • Lower extremity biomechanics during the landing of a stop-jump task.

    Bing Yu;Cheng Feng Lin;William E. Garrett

  • Aggressive Quadriceps Loading Can Induce Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

    Gene DeMorat;Paul Weinhold;Troy Blackburn;Steven Chudik

  • Graft Size and Patient Age Are Predictors of Early Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft

    Robert A. Magnussen;J. Todd R. Lawrence;Ryenn L. West;Alison P. Toth

  • Effect of fatigue on knee kinetics and kinematics in stop-jump tasks.

    Jonathan D. Chappell;Daniel C. Herman;Bradford S. Knight;Donald T. Kirkendall

  • Kinematics and Electromyography of Landing Preparation in Vertical Stop-Jump Risks for Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

    Jonathan D. Chappell;R. Alexander Creighton;Carol Giuliani;Bing Yu

  • Warm-up and muscular injury prevention. An update.

    Marc R. Safran;Anthony V. Seaber;William E. Garrett

Frequent Co-Authors

Darin A. Padua
Darin A. Padua University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kevin M. Guskiewicz
Kevin M. Guskiewicz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thomas M. Best
Thomas M. Best University of Miami
Stephen W. Marshall
Stephen W. Marshall University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Farshid Guilak
Farshid Guilak Washington University in St. Louis
Barry S. Myers
Barry S. Myers Duke University
Roger W. Nightingale
Roger W. Nightingale Duke University
Bruce D. Beynnon
Bruce D. Beynnon University of Vermont
Ming C. Lin
Ming C. Lin University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but looking for flexible study options, there are several related online degrees and alternative career paths beyond traditional medicine. For those passionate about pharmacy, an online pharmacy degree offers a convenient and cost-effective way to enter this respected field.

Healthcare administration and patient data management are also rapidly growing areas. Many now pursue careers by enrolling in online schools for health information management, gaining skills in the secure handling of sensitive medical information.

For those interested in healthcare support roles, a low cost medical coding and billing online program can open doors to vital behind-the-scenes positions within hospitals and clinics.

Nursing remains an in-demand profession, and many working professionals opt for the cheapest online fnp program to become family nurse practitioners, delivering frontline care to communities.

These flexible online degrees can help you launch or advance a healthcare career—even if attending a traditional, on-campus medical program is not the right fit for you.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Garrett

Recently Published Articles