World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5732
World Ranking
9839
National Ranking
4143

José Luis Ambite publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Luis Ambite sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

José Luis Ambite D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Luis Ambite sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

José Luis Ambite is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, their work focuses on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Ophthalmology.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a broad engagement with both computational and biomedical topics. Recent papers include:

  • Toward a fine-scale population health monitoring system, 2021, Cell
  • Rapid detection of identity-by-descent tracts for mega-scale datasets, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Semi-Synchronous Federated Learning for Energy-Efficient Training and Accelerated Convergence in Cross-Silo Settings, 2022, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
  • Minority-centric meta-analyses of blood lipid levels identify novel loci in the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study, 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • Using dynamic time warping self-organizing maps to characterize diurnal patterns in environmental exposures, 2021, Scientific Reports

Their frequent co-authors include Dimitris Stripelis, Paul M. Thompson, Greg Ver Steeg, Loïc Le Marchand, and Lucia A. Hindorff. Collaboration patterns suggest interdisciplinary work spanning computer science, genetics, and medical imaging.

Publications appear regularly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), UNC Libraries, Alzheimer's & Dementia, and Ophthalmology Science.

Key research topics covered in their work include:

  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Best Publications

  • Modeling Web sources for information integration

    Craig A. Knoblock;Steven Minton;José Luis Ambite;Naveen Ashish

  • Semi-automatically mapping structured sources into the semantic web

    Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro Szekely;José Luis Ambite;Aman Goel

  • The Ariadne approach to Web- based information integration

    Craig A. Knoblock;Steven Minton;Jose Luis Ambite;Naveen Ashish

  • Web service composition as planning

    Mark Carman;Jose Luis Ambite;Luciano Serafini;Craig Knoblock

  • Phenome-Wide Association Study (PheWAS) for Detection of Pleiotropy within the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Network

    Sarah A. Pendergrass;Kristin Brown-Gentry;Scott Dudek;Alex Frase

  • The use of phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) for exploration of novel genotype-phenotype relationships and pleiotropy discovery.

    S.A. Pendergrass;K. Brown-Gentry;S.M. Dudek;E.S. Torstenson

  • The Next PAGE in Understanding Complex Traits: Design for the Analysis of Population Architecture Using Genetics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study

    Tara C. Matise;Jose Luis Ambite;Steven Buyske;Christopher S. Carlson

  • Integration of heterogeneous knowledge sources in the CALO query manager

    José Luis Ambite;Vinay K. Chaudhri;Richard Fikes;Jessica Jenkins

  • Dynamically Composing Web Services from On-line Sources

    Snehal Thakkar;Craig A. Knoblock;Jose Luis Ambite;Cyrus Shahabi

  • Design and implementation of the CALO query manager

    Jose-Luis Ambite;Vinay K. Chaudhri;Richard Fikes;Jessica Jenkins

  • A Phenomics-Based Strategy Identifies Loci on APOC1, BRAP, and PLCG1 Associated with Metabolic Syndrome Phenotype Domains

    Christy L. Avery;Qianchuan He;Kari E. North;Jose L. Ambite

  • Exploiting spatiotemporal patterns for accurate air quality forecasting using deep learning

    Yijun Lin;Nikhit Mago;Yu Gao;Yaguang Li

  • Planning by rewriting: efficiently generating high-quality plans

    José Luis Ambite;Craig A. Knoblock

  • Ariadne: a system for constructing mediators for Internet sources

    José Luis Ambite;Naveen Ashish;Greg Barish;Craig A. Knoblock

  • Linking and building ontologies of linked data

    Rahul Parundekar;Craig A. Knoblock;José Luis Ambite

  • SchizConnect: Mediating neuroimaging databases on schizophrenia and related disorders for large-scale integration.

    Lei Wang;Kathryn I. Alpert;Vince D. Calhoun;Derin J. Cobia

  • A View Integration Approach to Dynamic Composition of Web Services

    Snehal Thakkar;Craig A. Knoblock;José Luis Ambite

  • Learning the semantics of structured data sources

    Mohsen Taheriyan;Craig A. Knoblock;Pedro Szekely;José Luis Ambite

  • Planning by rewriting

    José Luis Ambite;Craig A. Knoblock

  • Agents for information gathering

    J.L. Ambite;C.A. Knoblock

  • Mixed-initiative, multi-source information assistants

    Craig A. Knoblock;Steven Minton;José Luis Ambite;Maria Muslea

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig A. Knoblock
Craig A. Knoblock University of Southern California
Christopher A. Haiman
Christopher A. Haiman University of Southern California
Dana C. Crawford
Dana C. Crawford Case Western Reserve University
Steven Buyske
Steven Buyske Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ulrike Peters
Ulrike Peters University of Washington
Gerardo Heiss
Gerardo Heiss University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kari E. North
Kari E. North University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Loic Le Marchand
Loic Le Marchand University of Hawaii at Manoa
Steven Minton
Steven Minton InferLink Corporation
Myriam Fornage
Myriam Fornage The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide array of online degree and career options. Many popular online colleges offer flexible programs that let you study from anywhere, making it easier to balance education with work or personal commitments.

For those interested in creative technology, consider pursuing a game development online degree. This pathway blends programming skills with design, preparing you for careers in the rapidly growing video game industry.

If you are focused on keeping information safe, a cyber security degree can lead to high-demand roles across many sectors. As cybersecurity threats increase, employers are seeking graduates with the knowledge to protect sensitive digital assets.

Not all career paths are purely technical. If you prefer project management within tech-driven industries, the best 2 year construction management degree online blends technical skills with leadership, preparing you for roles in construction, building technology, and infrastructure development.

Best Scientists Citing José Luis Ambite

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles