World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
52347
World Ranking
5288
National Ranking
2855

Computer Science

D-Index
84
Citations
31747
World Ranking
843
National Ranking
460

Joshua C. Denny publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua C. Denny sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 381 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joshua C. Denny D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua C. Denny sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Joshua C. Denny is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a notable emphasis on genetics and molecular biology as subfields. Their work spans various topics including genetic associations and epidemiology, genomics and rare diseases, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, health, environment, cognitive aging, liver disease diagnosis and treatment, bioinformatics and genomic networks, and biomedical text mining and ontologies.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the academic community, with frequent publications in several prominent venues. The most common publication platforms include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Nature Communications, Genetics in Medicine Open, and Genetics in Medicine.

Among their recent published papers are:

  • A genomic mutational constraint map using variation in 76,156 human genomes (2023, Nature)
  • Precision medicine in 2030-seven ways to transform healthcare (2021, Cell)
  • Multi-ancestry genome-wide association analyses identify novel genetic mechanisms in rheumatoid arthritis (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity (2022, Patterns)
  • Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review (2020, PLoS ONE)

Joshua C. Denny frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Some of their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Dan M. Roden
  • Hákon Hákonarson
  • Wei-Qi Wei
  • Gail P. Jarvik
  • David R. Crosslin

The research scope of Joshua C. Denny covers extensive areas within medicine, particularly those aligned with genetic and molecular aspects of human health. Their strong involvement in genetic epidemiology and their contribution to understanding rare and complex diseases through genomics underscores their multidisciplinary approach.

In recognition of their work, Joshua C. Denny was awarded membership in the National Academy of Medicine in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery

    Yukinori Okada;Yukinori Okada;Di Wu;Di Wu;Di Wu;Gosia Trynka;Gosia Trynka;Towfique Raj;Towfique Raj

  • Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height

    Andrew R. Wood;Tonu Esko;Jian Yang;Sailaja Vedantam

  • A Gene-Based Association Method for Mapping Traits Using Reference Transcriptome Data

    Eric R Gamazon;Heather E Wheeler;Kaanan P Shah;Sahar V Mozaffari

  • Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies

    Wei Zhou;Jonas B. Nielsen;Lars G. Fritsche;Rounak Dey

  • PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations.

    Joshua C. Denny;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Melissa A. Basford;Jill M. Pulley

  • Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data

    Joshua C. Denny;Lisa Bastarache;Marylyn D. Ritchie;Robert J. Carroll

  • The "All of Us" Research Program.

    Joshua C. Denny;Stephanie A. Devaney;Kelly A. Gebo

  • Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.

    Robert Challen;Joshua Denny;Martin Pitt;Luke Gompels

  • Multi-Ethnic Genome-wide Association Study for Atrial Fibrillation

    Carolina Roselli;Mark D. Chaffin;Lu Chen Weng;Lu Chen Weng;Stefanie Aeschbacher

  • The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future

    Omri Gottesman;Helena Kuivaniemi;Gerard Tromp;W. Andrew Faucett

  • MedEx: a medication information extraction system for clinical narratives.

    Hua Xu;Shane P Stenner;Son Doan;Kevin B Johnson

  • Exome-wide association study of plasma lipids in > 300,000 individuals

    Dajiang J Liu;Gina M Peloso;Gina M Peloso;Haojie Yu;Adam S Butterworth;Adam S Butterworth

  • Inactivating mutations in NPC1L1 and protection from coronary heart disease

    Nathan O. Stitziel;Hong Hee Won;Alanna C. Morrison;Gina M. Peloso

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Mapping ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM Codes to Phecodes: Workflow Development and Initial Evaluation

    Patrick Wu;Aliya Gifford;Xiangrui Meng;Xue Li

  • R PheWAS: data analysis and plotting tools for phenome-wide association studies in the R environment

    Robert J. Carroll;Lisa Bastarache;Joshua C. Denny

  • Coding Variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the Risk of Coronary Disease

    Nathan O. Stitziel;Kathleen E. Stirrups;Nicholas G. D. Masca;Jeanette Erdmann

  • Trans-ethnic association study of blood pressure determinants in over 750,000 individuals.

    A Giri;J N Hellwege;J M Keaton;J M Keaton;J Park

  • Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation.

    S. Trent Rosenbloom;Joshua C. Denny;Hua Xu;Nancy M. Lorenzi

  • Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: The design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project

    J. M. Pulley;J. C. Denny;J. F. Peterson;G. R. Bernard

  • Validation of Electronic Medical Record-Based Phenotyping Algorithms: Results and Lessons Learned From the eMERGE Network

    Katherine M. Newton;Peggy L. Peissig;Abel Ngo Kho;Suzette J. Bielinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan M. Roden
Dan M. Roden Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Hua Xu
Hua Xu Yale University
Marylyn D. Ritchie
Marylyn D. Ritchie University of Pennsylvania
Gail P. Jarvik
Gail P. Jarvik University of Washington
Jyotishman Pathak
Jyotishman Pathak Cornell University
Dana C. Crawford
Dana C. Crawford Case Western Reserve University
Christopher G. Chute
Christopher G. Chute Johns Hopkins University
Catherine A. McCarty
Catherine A. McCarty University of Minnesota
Rex L. Chisholm
Rex L. Chisholm Northwestern University
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science opens doors to a wide spectrum of related online degrees and evolving career pathways. Whether you’re interested in building software, managing data, or solving engineering challenges, there are affordable and flexible programs available that fit different interests.

For students considering a blend of technology and environmental impact, plenty of environmental engineering schools online offer modern programs suited for those passionate about sustainability and innovation. If your focus is on machinery and technical systems, you might explore the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering options to upskill without the high cost.

Those fascinated by the fundamental laws that govern our world can enroll in online physics degrees. Alternatively, if you’re looking to specialize in a highly in-demand sector, choosing an affordable data science degree can lead to promising opportunities in analytics and AI.

With the rise of online education, students can now access quality programs across these varied disciplines while comfortably managing their finances and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua C. Denny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles